Speaking of sealed documents, in a few years we'll be coming upon the 50th anniversary of the sealing of the "official report" of the JFK assassination (cover up) which we thought we'd never see. Will it make any difference? What relationship will it have with the truth? --Ediger
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Rod Goke <[email protected]> wrote: > You never know whether different witnesses will give similar or different > descriptions of an incident until you let them talk. In an effort to "get to > the truth-whatever it is", what sources of information are there other than > witnesses and physical evidence? When witnesses are told not to talk and > when physical evidence is destroyed or sealed where no one can examine it, > how do you expect people to get to the truth? >
