This is just too weird, practically that very same article appeared in 
GovExec.com this morning:
 
CBP to continue searches of travelers' laptops
By Gautham Nagesh [email protected] 
August 28, 2009 


 

The Homeland Security Department announced on Thursday that it will continue to 
allow Customs and Border Protection officials to search travelers' laptop 
computers and other electronic devices without suspicion of wrongdoing.
 
The practice of searching travelers' electronic devices without suspicion has 
been controversial. In April 2008, a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judge ruled 
CBP agents do not need reasonable suspicion to search travelers' laptops, smart 
phones and other electronic devices.
 
In June 2009, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil 
Rights and Civil Liberties held a hearing on the issue, which has been 
challenged in court 11 times by individuals convicted of having child 
pornography on their laptops.
 
Homeland Security released two directives on Thursday, indicating the Obama 
administration will continue the practice of suspicionless searches, much to 
the dismay of privacy advocates. Group such as the Electronic Frontier 
Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union have opposed the practice, 
saying it is invasive and likely to lead to racial and religious profiling.
 
"Keeping Americans safe in an increasingly digital world depends on our ability 
to lawfully screen materials entering the United States," said DHS Secretary 
Janet Napolitano. "The new directives announced today strike the balance 
between respecting the civil liberties and privacy of all travelers, while 
ensuring DHS can take the lawful actions necessary to secure our borders."
 
The new directives describe the department's policy on searching travelers' 
laptops, cell phones and other electronic devices in-depth and set a five-day 
limit on Customs and Border Protection searches. Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement special agents are allowed up to 30 days to search an electronic 
device. The new rules require agents to get a supervisor's approval before 
confiscating a device and CBP must notify travelers where their device is being 
kept.
  

But the changes don't go far enough, according to Christopher Calabrese, 
counsel for the ACLU's Technology and Liberty program. 
 
"Essentially, they retain the power to look at any laptop at any time," 
Calabrese said. "Our reaction is that we still haven't reached the core 
problems of the searches -- the totally suspicionless search of anyone with a 
laptop and anything on a laptop."
 
Calabrese said in addition to protecting sensitive information like legal 
documents or medical records that might be on the devices, his organization is 
concerned about CBP agents using the policies to profile minorities. The policy 
is misguided, given that anyone attempting to smuggle data into the United 
States could easily do so from anywhere in the world via an encrypted e-mail, 
he added.
 
"There have been a number of reports from advocacy organizations, Muslim 
advocates, describing people clearly targeted because of religion and race," 
Calabrese said. "We take it too much for granted in this country sometimes, 
that when we're talking about security it's OK to do nudge-and-wink racial 
profiling. But it's not, and it doesn't have security value."
 
Customs and Border Protection searched approximately 1,000 laptops between Oct. 
1, 2008, and Aug. 11, 2009, 46 of them in-depth.

 
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:05:40 -0500
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Texascavers] Big-Brother related
> 
> Is this for real ??
> 
> http://tech.yahoo.com/news/pcworld/20090829/tc_pcworld/dhsclarifieslaptopbordercrossingruleswhatyouneedtoknow
> 
> 
> This is caving related because many Texas cavers cross the border with
> gadgets that store
> data and photos.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

Reply via email to