texascavers Digest 30 May 2009 07:15:57 -0000 Issue 765

Topics (messages 10781 through 10794):

book review: Biology of Caves
        10781 by: Mixon Bill

Acid-loving Extremophiles
        10782 by: Minton, Mark

book prices
        10783 by: Mixon Bill
        10785 by: Minton, Mark
        10786 by: John Brooks
        10789 by: ellie :)

Honey Creek Cave tank haul trip June 6
        10784 by: speleosteele.tx.rr.com

WNS Meeting Report   FYI
        10787 by: Ronald Adams

WNS in Virginia
        10788 by: Minton, Mark

caver in the news - old article
        10790 by: David

Good Airflow!
        10791 by: Minton, Mark

TX Convention Daily Schedule
        10792 by: Preston Forsythe

Re: 15th ICS � Day passes
        10793 by: Mixon Bill

Re: 2009 J2 Expedition Wrap]
        10794 by: David Ochel

Administrivia:

To subscribe to the digest, e-mail:
        <[email protected]>

To unsubscribe from the digest, e-mail:
        <[email protected]>

To post to the list, e-mail:
        <[email protected]>


----------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Begin Message --- "The Biology of Caves and Other Subterranean Habitats." David C. Culver and Tanja Pipan. Oxford University Press, New York; 2009. 6 by 9 inches, 254 pages, softbound. $60. Biology of Habitats Series.

While there has been no lack of monographs on cave geology in recent years, the situation in cave biology has been different. If someone wanted to borrow a book on cave biology, I'd have most likely lent the curiously named 1992 "Natural History of Biospeleology," a 675-page collection of papers published by the Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales in Madrid. Culver and Pipan's new book is a semi-technical introduction to underground life. It covers not only cave life in the usual sense but also fauna found in similar environments, such as stream-bed gravels or the epikarst, the pitted and furrowed limestone beneath the soil. It includes, of course, a summary of the main groups of subterranean species, from microbes, through the twenty-one orders of invertebrates with more than fifty troglobitic species, to vertebrates such as bats, salamanders, and fish. In addition, there are nice chapters on energy sources, communities, and other ecological topics, as well as discussions of the evolution of troglomorphic traits such as blindness. Most cavers should be able to read and profit from it, but occasionally an unexplained word like "pleiotropy" will send them to the glossary. One author is American and the other is at a karst research institute in Slovenia, so both Europe and North America are especially well covered, and the book is, of course, up to date, with the latest trends in research covered.

Considering the pretensions of the publisher, the proofreading is poor, but the glitches, such as where someone typed "but" for "by," are obvious and don't interfere with understanding. The many illustrations and tables are clear. The book is a nice companion to the recent "Cave Geology" by Art Palmer. It would be nicer, though, if it hadn't fallen into the hands of a pricey European academic press. The geology book is hardbound and has larger pages and two hundred more of them. It was published by Cave Books, the publishing arm of the Cave Research Foundation, and costs $37.95, less than two-thirds what Oxford wants for "Biology of Caves." A companion volume on biology from Cave Books has long been rumored. Until it appears, Culver and Pipan's book is it. Whether the authors succeed in getting people to use "speleobiology" instead of "biospeleology" remains to be seen.--Bill Mixon
---------------------------------------------
He who renders warfare fatal to all engaged in it will be the greatest benefactor the world has yet known. - Sir Richard Burton
----------------------------------------------
You may "reply" to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: [email protected]
AMCS: [email protected] or [email protected]




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
      For the biologists:  
<http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news-microbes-more-diverse-than-thought.aspx>

Mark Minton

Extreme Microbes More Diverse Than Thought
May 28, 2009
Researchers at the Univ. of Illinois report that microbes able to live in 
boiling acid are more diverse than previously thought, and that their diversity 
is driven largely by geographic isolation. Sulfolobus islandicus is offering up 
its secrets to researchers hardy enough to capture it from the volcanic hot 
springs where it thrives.
The findings open a new window on microbial evolution, demonstrating for the 
first time that geography can trump other factors that influence the makeup of 
genes an organism hosts. S. islandicus belongs to the archaea, a group of 
single-celled organisms that live in a variety of habitats including some of 
the most forbidding environments on the planet. Once lumped together with 
bacteria, archaea are now classified as a separate domain of life.
"Archaea are really different from bacteria - as different from bacteria as we 
are," said Rachel Whitaker, a professor of microbiology. Whitaker has spent 
almost a decade studying the genetic characteristics of S. islandicus. The 
extreme physical needs of S. islandicus make it an ideal organism for studying 
the impact of geographic isolation. It can live only at temperatures that 
approach the boiling point of water and in an environment that has the pH of 
battery acid. It breathes oxygen, eats volcanic gases and expels sulfuric acid. 
It is unlikely that it can survive even a short distance from the hot springs 
where it is found.
By comparing the genetic characteristics of individuals from Yellowstone 
National Park, Lassen Park, and a Russian volcano, Whitaker was able to see how 
each of the populations had evolved since they were isolated from one another 
more than 900,000 years ago.
The complete genome of S. islandicus contains a set of core genes that are 
shared among all members of this group, with some minor differences in the 
sequence of nucleotides that spell out individual genes. But it also contains a 
variable genome, with groups of genes that differ - sometimes dramatically - 
from one subset, or strain, to another.
Whitaker found that the variable genome in individual strains of S. islandicus 
is evolving at a rapid rate, with high levels of variation even between two or 
three individuals in the same location.
"Some people think that these variable genes are the way that microbes are 
adapting to new environments," Whitaker said. "You land in a new place, you 
need a new function in that new place, you pick up that set of genes from 
whoever's there or we don't know who from, and now you can survive there. We've 
shown that does not occur."
"This tells you that there's a lot more diversity than we thought," Whitaker 
said. "Each hot spring region has its own genome and its own genome components 
and is evolving in its own unique way. And if each place is evolving in its own 
unique way, then each one is different and there's this amazing diversity. I 
mean, beetles are nothing compared to the diversity of microbes."
These findings challenge the idea that microbes draw whatever they may need 
from a near-universal pool of available genetic material, Whitaker said. It 
appears instead that S. islandicus, at least, acquires new genes from a very 
limited genetic reservoir stored in viruses and other genetic elements that are 
constrained to each geographic location on Earth.
Source: Univ. of Illinois

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- Here's a good one for suckers. Look up Art Palmer's "Cave Geology" at amazon.com. They don't sell it themselves, evidently, but several third parties are advertising "new and used" copies, the cheapest of which is $121.60. The book is in print at the publisher for $37.95, and available from places like the NSS Bookstore and Speleobooks for about that.--Mixon
---------------------------------------------
He who renders warfare fatal to all engaged in it will be the greatest benefactor the world has yet known. - Sir Richard Burton
----------------------------------------------
You may "reply" to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: [email protected]
AMCS: [email protected] or [email protected]




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
     Bill Mixon said:

Here's a good one for suckers. Look up Art Palmer's "Cave Geology" at amazon.com. They 
don't sell it themselves, evidently, but several third parties are advertising "new and 
used" copies, the cheapest of which is $121.60. The book is in print at the publisher for 
$37.95,

     The really weird thing on Amazon is that in the Price at a Glance box in 
the upper right corner of the Cave Geology sellers page, the list price of 
$37.95 is given, with a line through it, and then the exorbitant resellers 
prices are listed below.  Normally the prices in the Price at a Glance box are 
better deals than the list price, at least for books in print.  It makes no 
sense.

Mark Minton

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
It's a conspiracy.....designed to enrage crudmudgeons everywhere.
I have a sinister plan to foil their evil plan...let's boycott and NOT buy it 
at THAT price!

Sent from my iPhone

On May 28, 2009, at 10:21 PM, "Minton, Mark" <[email protected]> wrote:

      Bill Mixon said:
 
>Here's a good one for suckers. Look up Art Palmer's "Cave Geology" at 
>amazon.com. They don't sell it themselves, evidently, but several third 
>parties are advertising "new and used" copies, the cheapest of which is 
>$121.60. The book is in print at the publisher for $37.95,
 
      The really weird thing on Amazon is that in the Price at a Glance box in 
the upper right corner of the Cave Geology sellers page, the list price of 
$37.95 is given, with a line through it, and then the exorbitant resellers 
prices are listed below.  Normally the prices in the Price at a Glance box are 
better deals than the list price, at least for books in print.  It makes no 
sense.
 
Mark Minton

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I bought one a few months back from Amazon for $37.95 and they shipped it
for free. They must have instated their evil plan after I bought mine. Sorry
everyone else. Good thing we have the NSS Bookstore and Speleobooks.

On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:39 AM, John Brooks <[email protected]>wrote:

> It's a conspiracy.....designed to enrage crudmudgeons everywhere.
> I have a sinister plan to foil their evil plan...let's boycott and NOT buy
> it at THAT price!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 28, 2009, at 10:21 PM, "Minton, Mark" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>        Bill Mixon said:
>
> >Here's a good one for suckers. Look up Art Palmer's "Cave Geology" at
> amazon.com. They don't sell it themselves, evidently, but several third
> parties are advertising "new and used" copies, the cheapest of which is
> $121.60. The book is in print at the publisher for $37.95,
>
>       The really weird thing on Amazon is that in the Price at a Glance box
> in the upper right corner of the Cave Geology sellers page, the list price
> of $37.95 is given, with a line through it, and then the exorbitant
> resellers prices are listed below.  Normally the prices in the Price at a
> Glance box are better deals than the list price, at least for books in
> print.  It makes no sense.
>
> Mark Minton
>
>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Texas Cavers,

There will be an Epic, Historic, and quite possibly the Last, Honey Creek Cave 
tank haul trip on Saturday, June 6. James Brown and Jean "Creature" Krejca will 
dive the 1,435 foot long HS upstream sump (only Brown has reached the other 
side), taking a cave radio to transmit to awaiting cavers on the surface. We 
could still use some more members of the haul team. 

So, if a 17 - 18 hour long wetsuit caving trip, wading and salamandering in 68 
degree water, crawling, sinking in knee to thigh deep mud, and a hour of 
stoop-walking, all with a piece of the dive gear (maybe even a tank), suits 
your fancy, and you'd like to do some Epic, Historic, and likely the Last tank 
haul trip into the far reaches of Texas' longest cave, then please e-mail me 
before the handful of remaining slots are taken.

We could also use a handful more surface folk, too, to watch out that all is 
conducted safely lowering and raising people in 
the 145 foot deep shaft entrance. 

Best regards,

Bill Steele
Irving, Texas

PS - It came to my attention at Honey Creek Cave last month that Puppy Lewis 
may not really have inadvertently spent the 
night in the cave on the January tank haul trip. It may have been a very well 
executed, elaborate joke on me. If so, 
good work, I fell for it.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Texas Cavers!

I am forwarding this WNS meeting report for informational purposes, I know this 
is somewhat Indiana specific, but this does have a lot of good info and 
addresses many of the problems that many states are facing with this.
Have a great weekend!
Ron

  
To all concerned,
  
After talking with many cavers since the White-Nose Syndrome (WNS) meeting last 
Thursday night (5/21) I have put together this summary of the meeting and the 
perspectives of some of the cavers. The function of this letter is twofold, to 
inform cavers about the meeting and WNS in general, and to summarize caver 
views and give feedback in writing to the officials involved.
The IDNR and USFW informational meeting was well represented by several 
concerned state and federal officials.  DNR Deputy Director John Davis, who 
made the decision to close all State owned cave resources, was there in person 
to face all those impacted.  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biologists Andrew 
King and Scott Johnson, both out of Bloomington, IN presented info from their 
side. They did a good job of inviting grottos, outdoor clubs, miners, loggers 
and other stakeholders from Indiana and surrounding states. They all stayed 
late until all questions were answered! 

The Presentation
The first portion of the meeting was a video presentation showing the 
investigation of bat fatalities in a Vermont cave. It was devastating to see 
the huge amounts of little brown bats dead and dying from the effects of this 
thing. A lot of them just froze by going to colder spots outside to try to slow 
down their metabolisms in a desperate attempt to use as little energy as 
possible. The scientists studying the carnage were the same folks who have 
spent the last 40 or whatever years of their lives trying (successfully) to 
boost the populations of these very animals. You could see the devastation 
written all over their faces. 

The History 
Even though I thought I was well informed, there were several points that I 
learned from the informational portion of the meeting. WNS was first documented 
in a commercial cave (Howe Caverns) in New York State. Also further background 
info stated that a similar looking fungus has been documented on bats seen in 
Europe. The statement was also made that Europe does not have significant 
numbers of bats with colonies of 50 or less seen at the most populous areas, 
and I got the impression that for the amount of caves there are in Europe, 
there should be a lot more bats. Cavers in Europe have seen a similar fungus on 
an occasional bat and considered it normal for what they have seen over the 
years. A photo showed a single bat with fungus growing on its nose within a 
small cluster, and it was the only one in the cluster that had it. The European 
fungus is currently being compared to the US version to see if it is the same 
organism. If positive, the case could
 be made that WNS was brought here by people who visited a cave in Europe and 
then came to the US and visited Howe Caverns.

The Migration Patterns
After the video, several charts were put on the screen that showed the 
migration and interaction routes of the bats as documented by tagging bats and 
seeing how they migrate. The interaction patterns showed the bats mingling down 
a main path from New York that paralleled the East Coast south through the 
Virginias and then west into Kentucky. This was the main traffic route with 
auxiliary routes going south to Tennessee and further and other auxiliary 
routes coming up to Indiana from Kentucky. Sadly, Southern Indiana is not very 
far from the main route going east / west through Kentucky. 

The Spread
The next charts showed where WNS was known in 2006, 2007, and 2008. The 
progress of the spread followed right along that main traffic pattern shown on 
the charts. And while human transmission has been possibly documented in a 
couple caves, WNS seems to be spreading rapidly right along the main migration 
and interaction route that has been determined by research over the years. If 
human transmission were a major factor, WNS should have shown up at several 
places off of the main migration routes.  Also, by looking at the distance it 
has traveled since 2006, one could easily see that it could be in our state as 
early as 2009 - 2010 hibernation period (this winter!), or almost certainly the 
season after that. Not much time to do something about it! 

Indiana Populations
Other charts showed info about the bat populations in Indiana, which are around 
250,000 total (2007 estimate). Roughly 95% of our cave bats are the endangered 
Indiana bats, and roughly 95% of those bats are in 30 caves in Indiana. And a 
large portion of those bats (98%) are in 9 of those caves, with the other 21 
caves containing 1000 or less each. Basically, our bats are mostly concentrated 
in 9 caves... A comment was made during the slides that the Indiana bat was not 
hit by WNS as quickly as the little browns. I was relieved to hear this, but I 
asked about this after the meeting and was told that they are at just as much 
risk as the other species, which left me a bit confused. 

After viewing all the information presented and then hearing a discussion about 
the government response of "risk management", there seemed to be some 
contradictions within their responses. This is not a criticism, they do care 
about the bats, the cavers, and are trying to balance everyone's concerns and 
interests and make the right decisions. Their initial decision to close caves 
was made quickly even though Indiana is outside the 17 state impacted / buffer 
zone that the USFWS has asked for voluntary cooperation. The officials want 
feedback from all concerned to help make informed decisions moving forward. The 
caver perceived contradictions are listed as follows: 
(1) The first place WNS was documented was a commercial cave, and with Mammoth 
cave being right in the center of the main migration route, and with Kentucky 
having way more bats than most states, one would think that officials would 
close all state and federal commercial tours until some kind of decontamination 
protocol could be found and implemented. These closures would greatly speed the 
process of getting decon procedures in place. The need for decon protocol was 
discussed but no decon action has been implemented yet, we were told this is 
forthcoming. They also discussed the intent to recommend decon procedures for 
privately owned commercial caves. Based on the info, my impression is that 
commercial caves are ground zero for the possibility of human transmission. I 
believe that Mammoth Cave National Park is visited by more folks than any other 
NP in the US! The commercial caves remain open with no decon protocol in place. 
One could argue that with all
 the privately owned caves around MCNP, closing the park caves does not make 
sense, but this emphasizes the great need for some kind of decon procedure to 
be in place at the park and strongly suggested to the private operations. 
  
(2) The one group which has implemented decon procedures is the organized 
cavers. It is possible that cavers unknowingly spread WNS early on, but now 
that this is known, the cavers as a group have taken the most action in 
determining how to decontaminate, not using gear or clothes used in WNS states 
in other areas, closing caves with major bat populations, changing the focus of 
caving events all across the USA to protect bats, and many of those caves with 
major bat populations were already protected from other risks by organized 
cavers. Most of the data available about caves, bats, cave maps, cave locations 
was supplied by volunteer groups of organized cavers. And when the blanket 
closure policy was questioned, the officials even admitted that the caving 
groups represented in the room were not the major concern, it was those who are 
less in the know about WNS who visit caves who are considered the risk for 
human transmission. The organized cavers are the
 group doing the most to prevent the spread. 

(3) "Risk management" is basically an attempt to avoid human transmission to 
keep from speeding the transmission rate that the bats will do on their own, to 
theoretically buy time to find a treatment. In our state this could be feasible 
since the bats are so concentrated, but all admit that a human introduced 
"cure" may be a long shot. One could assume that assessing the risks would 
start with an estimate of how much time it will take for the bats to bring the 
fungus to any particular region and then work backwards from there. A time 
estimate for WNS spreading to Indiana was not mentioned, I had to ask for a 
time estimate based on the known transmission rate. This topic was so 
depressing that it was grudgingly addressed, and their best guess was in the 
next 1 or 2 seasons it will be here. This is such a short amount of time that 
bat transmission may work just as quickly as human transmission would at this 
point in our state. I think that many cavers in
 the room felt the following actions are appropriate: (1) closing the state and 
federally owned bat caves, (2)contacting the owners of the remaining of the 30 
prominent bat caves, (3) an education program to teach the public about the 
great risk to our bat populations, the effects wiped out bat populations will 
have on our eco system, and how important bats are to the chain of life, would 
all be more effective than blanket closures. This would promote awareness and 
compliance, while blanket closures would keep out the most informed (the 
organized cavers) and the least informed (independent sport cavers and 
spelunkers) would still be caving. Bats have had a bad rap in the public eye 
for many, many years; a PR program could really help the public understand that 
bats should be protected.

(4) Since the Daniels Administration was elected Governor in Indiana, logging 
in our State Forests has greatly increased (as much as ten fold). The amount of 
land being timbered increased and also the amount and variety of wood taken in 
those tracts increased. This does have a negative impact on the bats. Bart Nott 
had recently seen some freshly logged tracts above the caves and was disturbed 
by the amount of cutting done. He asked if suspending such logging has been 
considered and the response was a flat out no. This seemed inconsistent with an 
all out policy to protect bats, but it does open another can of political 
worms, groups do not like environmental restrictions that block profits from 
natural resources and land development. State officials have to juggle all of 
these groups. It is much easier to just tell cavers they cannot go to any 
caves... 
  
(5) The biologists on the panel were concerned greatly about the 20 privately 
owned of the 30 notable bat caves and are in communication with those owners 
regarding this issue. The cavers were very supportive of this stance. It was 
obvious that the state and federal officials had not yet hammered out a solid 
policy of how to handle the few thousand other privately owned caves in 
Indiana. The bat biologists seemed to think that only the major bat cave owners 
should be contacted, but others on the panel felt that press releases should be 
made to ask all cave owners to close their caves. The cavers felt like this 
would be very bad for many sensitive relationships developed with cave owners 
over decades and that the single bat or 2 in isolated caves should not be 
grouped with the populated bat caves when assessing the risk. The amount of 
time it would take for someone's cousin from New York to infect a single cave 
with 1 bat and then the amount of time it
 would take for that bat to spread this to the major bat populations is a much 
longer process than the obvious bat to bat transmission timeline will be. I 
know this is some conjecture on my part, but so is risk management in general. 
Here again, cavers felt that benefits of education would far outweigh voluntary 
compliance to voluntary blanket closures that would create uncertainty in 
landowner relations for possibly decades into the future.

In conclusion, after talking with several of the cavers present at the meeting, 
the organized cavers are very concerned and want to do everything in their 
power to prevent the spread of this devastating disease. I think that most of 
the cavers feel that we are the backbone of everything that is known about 
caves, bats, and karst in this country, and no one is paying us for this stuff; 
it’s because we love caves and bats. The majority of cavers feel that a blanket 
closure of state, private, and federal caves in the Eastern United States is a 
prohibition that is unrealistic and not the best solution to the WNS problem. 
They feel that identifying the major bat caves, protecting them, minimizing the 
possibility of human transmission by cave tours with decontamination, 
minimizing the possibility of human transmission by cavers with decontamination 
and travel restrictions, and education of the public for (1) awareness of how 
to prevent human transmission,
 (2) for awareness of how important and beneficial bats are to our environment, 
(3) and to communicate the need for funding for research; are the most 
effective ways to move forward.

Thanks very much,

Ron Adams,    NSS # 41114
Chairman, Central Indiana Grotto
Member, Indiana Karst Conservancy, Indiana Cave Survey

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
       Here are four brief reports on WNS in Virginia sent to VARList by Wil 
Orndorff.  The most interesting thing to me is that some of the affected bats 
_do not_ show Geomyces infestation.  This supports the hypothesis that the 
underlying cause of WNS is something else, and the fungal infection is 
secondary.

Mark Minton
 

1) Confirmation of Newberry-Banes Bats WNS

Results were received last week about the Newberry-Bane Cave bats

3 male Little browns were necropsied.

Geomyces sp. fungus was cultured from one of the three, while "mixed fungal 
growth not consistent with Geomyces" was cultured from the other two. All three 
bats were in good body condition.

Note that over 10% of the bats in areas the collecting team visited exhibited 
fungus on their wings and muzzles consistent in appearance with WNS.

National Wildlife Health Center advises to proceed assuming the cave is 
infected with WNS.
-----------------------------------
 
2) Endless Caverns Bats
 
from National Wildlife Health Center communique:

"3 bats were examined and all appeared in fair to good body conditions.  No 
significant internal lesions were observed.  All had mixed fungal growth 
on either their muzzle, wings or both but none appeared Geomyces-like. PCR 
results and histopathology are also pending on these 3 bats."

So WNS, as defined by the presence of Geomyces sp. fungus, is NOT confirmed at 
Endless Caverns.  PCR and histopathology will tell us more.

---

Possible interpretations.

1 - Not WNS

2 - WNS is enabling growth of multiple fungal species on bats, and therefore 
the fungus itself is not the primary culprit.

3 - ???
--------------------------------
 
3) Cumberland County Bat
 
The one bat submitted to date from the Virginia Piedmont for possible WNS did 
not turn up positive for Geomyces sp.

It was in poor body condition, however, and did have a mixed fungal growth.
--------------------------------
 
4) Possible WNS in Smyth County
 
DGIF and DCR staff visited Hancock Cave on Thursday in response to caver 
reports of WNS-like fungal growth on bats in the cave.  A few pipistrelles with 
significant fungal growth on wings and muzzles were collected fairly close to 
the entrance and shipped to the National Wildlife Health Center for necropsy 
and other analyses.

If this site turns out to indeed be WNS, and all indications are that it is, 
the disease is now in the Upper Tennessee River Basin, no more than 6 miles 
from the nearest Gray Bat summer colony in Marion, VA.
-----------------------------------

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I was in a re-sale shop yesterday and stumbled across an
issue of a magazine called "National Parks,"

http://www.npca.org/

I opened it up and there was the smiling face of a caver on
rope that I recognized.

The article was from June 2000, titled "Guardians of the Park."
The article devoted several paragraphs to her volunteer work with
the CRF and Carlsbad Caverns.

I got it for 17 cents.    I will have it at my next yard sale.


Also,

The NPCA web-site has over 15 web-pages devoted to
caves, for example:

http://www.npca.org/parks/oregon-caves-national-monument.html

David Locklear
caver in Fort Bend county

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
      Here are a couple of short videos showing tremendous airflow from Crevice Cave, MO.  Pretty amazing!
 
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jir34Ms-XwQ>
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRLQoDsNQT8>
 
Mark Minton

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I am curious what is planned for the last day of convention-Sunday, July 26?

Is Sunday a full day?

The first day of the CRF-Mammoth Cave post convention field trip is Monday, July 27 and without a jet plane the timing is tight.

I am guessing it is an 18 hour trip by truck between Kerrville and Hamilton Valley.

If the schedule is not final and details are still being worked out, we can manage ok. We'll arrive at MaCa a little late, that's all.

Preston in Outer Browder, KY





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Forwarded by Mixon:

Begin forwarded message:

From: ICS 2009 eList <[email protected]>
List-Post: [email protected]
Date: May 29, 2009 10:55:20 AM CDT
To: [email protected]
Subject: 15th ICS – Day passes

Dear Friends,

We have recently received some questions: Will day passes be available for the 15th International Congress of Speleology (ICS)? Yes! You can only register for day passes at the ICS, not in advance. The prices will be:

Sunday, 19 July: $50
Monday, 20 July: $50 + optional Howdy Party for $35
Tuesday, 21 July: $50
Wednesday, 22 July: $50 + optional the trip expense which varies according to the trip selected (no additional charge for the evening campground party or auction) or $15 for the campground party and auction only
Thursday, 23 July: $50
Friday, 24 July: $50 + optional NSS Banquet for $38
Saturday, 25 July: $50 + optional ICS Banquet for $38
Sunday, 26 July: $50

Except for the special Wednesday trips (and other trips throughout the week), all of the optional items above are included within the price of regular registration. The day passes will not include the guidebook and proceedings which are also included with regular registration. Copies will be available for sale.

Again, day passes can only be purchased at the ICS in Kerrville. If you wish to register now before the price goes up on 1 June, or before early registration closes on 8 June, go to https://secure.concentric.com/ics2009.us/register/ and visit our website, www.ics2009.us, for more information.

George

George Veni, Ph.D.
Chairman, 15th International Congress of Speleology
Adjunct Secretary, International Union of Speleology
Executive Director, U.S. National Cave and Karst Research Institute

----
You have received this message because you are subscribed to the 2009 ICS eList. To unsubscribe, please visit:
http://ics2009mail.nfshost.com/pommo/user/


---------------------------------------------
He who renders warfare fatal to all engaged in it will be the greatest benefactor the world has yet known. - Sir Richard Burton
----------------------------------------------
You may "reply" to the address this message
came from, but for long-term use, save:
Personal: [email protected]
AMCS: [email protected] or [email protected]




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

I'm forwarding a summary from Bill Stone about the last few weeks
at J2.

Cheers,
David

-------- Original Message --------

To all J2 2009 Participants:

The last of the derig crew for J2 2009 is down the mountain.  All
personnel are out safely with no accidents, although there were a
harrowing 4 days when several team members were trapped beyond the
Surprise Sump and out of food -- 5 dived through the sump on Scuba after
3 days to get food and emergency rescue diving gear... but that's
another story.

The final push was 19 days underground, beginning on May 5.  Jose
Morales and myself spent 7-1/2 days of that time at Camp 4.  Quick
summary: Sump 3 was explored for 170 m and definitively connects to the
head of Sump 4, carrying flow into it.
Sump 4 saw 3 exploratory dives.  The first surfaced into an infeeder
tunnel at 170m penetration but was not passable.  The second dive
searched the north and east walls of this tunnel looking for possible
continuations.   The main tunnel was 8 to 12 m wide by up to 12m tall.
 The continuation was discovered by Jose in a 5x5m tunnel on the north
wall about 105m into the sump. On the third dive in Sump 4 this was
pushed to 350m penetration in 8 to 10m wide x 5 to 8m tall borehole.
Jose  surfaced in an airbell but the tunnel continued shallow below and
appears to be rising.   Another very large airbell was discovered at
about 200m penetration that appears to have dry borehole heading east
and west about 5m above the water surface. At that point we ran out of
diving consumables -- had we been able to muster two more duffels of
replacement gas, absorbent, and dive line from the surface I am certain
we would have cracked the sump.  But by this time the team was down to 8
and there was no backup team on the surface.

The most striking thing about the final diving push from Camp 4,
and the reason it took us so long to figure out what was going on is
that the cave took a totally unexpected turn and now heads predominantly
on a 240 degree heading, almost perpendicular to Cheve... with a current
closure gap of less than 1 km !!!!!  Altogether we mapped about 600 m
of underwater tunnels in addition to the dry cave surveyed by Matt
Covington and Marcin Gala.  The result is a complete change in
direction to the cave.

Meanwhile, Yuri Schwartz and Sergey Tkachenko worked on climbing
leads from Camp 3.   They climbed all of the major dome leads that
had remained from 2006.  All either connected back into the main
passage or ended in breakdown.

While Yuri and Sergey were completing the final climb Jose and
I met with David Ochel, Vickie Siegel, and Nikki Green and began
the derig upwards to Camp 2A.  It was after 2 days of hauling that
we reached Surprise Sump and found it closed.... Jonas later indicated
that he believes we had an early onset of the rainy season this year.
Rains persisted for four days and abated to heavy misting.  By this
time Yuri and Sergey had packed Camp 3 and arrived at Camp 2A.
They and David Ochel graciously volunteered to return to Sump 2
and retrieve two of the side mount carbon tanks, hoods and masks
to allow for an emergency egress through Surprise Sump.  I did the
exploratory upstream dive and set up a phone link.  Then Jose and
I shuffled people through on the 9mm safety rope we had installed.
Sergey, Yuri, and Vickie dived through in addition to Jose and myself
and we then move the egress operation to Camp 1.  We left
a drysuit for David Ochel and he and Nikki Green (who cannot dive)
remained at the bivouac while we sent a team to the surface
for a full helmet dive system and food.   Thanks to the
new Michie phones we were able to keep hourly contact with the
entire team and just prior to the surface team returning with the
emergency dive gear the sump broke with 10 cm of air space.  David
then pulled 9 duffels of derig gear (in addition to the four Jose hauled
earlier) and we had everyone out on the upstream side of the
ex sump.  It took 2 more days to derig to the surface.

We expect to finalize the survey data in the next week and
will announce a new depth and length for the cave at that time -- we reached
a depth of 20 meters in Sump 4.  Vickie Siegel will be drafting the
formal J2 map (with Last Bash) over the summer with help from
other team members who have interest.

I will be working over the next 8 months with Marcin Gala,
Matt Covington, and Jon Lilestollen as time permits to help with
planning a return effort, mainly to connect Last Bash and bypass the
Surprise Sump in 2010 in preparation for a more rigorous return
to Sump 4 in 2011.   Before leaving we spent considerable effort
and successfully secured the political situation on the mountain
that should benefit the 2010 expedition.

Although 2009 extracted an extraordinary price in sweat for the
meters of passage gained, I am extremely optimistic that what
was done this year has set us up for a major breakthrough.
I would like to personally thank each and every one of the participants
who helped make the 2009 J2 project happen.   The team dynamics
were excellent and I hope that we can maintain that achievement
in the future.

Sincerely,

Bill Stone
Leader
Proyecto Cheve
May 27, 2009
from Nautla, Mexico

-- 
David Ochel, mailto:[email protected]


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to