Bustamante is EXACTLY what I had in mind. Not, say... whirlpool. :)
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:33 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Damn Crackberry. "Md" should have read "Mn"... > ------Original Message------ > From: AAA Home > To: Lyndon Tiu > To: [email protected] > ReplyTo: AAA Home > Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Best Use of 'These Awful Movies > Sent: Jun 10, 2009 1:30 PM > > Before flashbulbs appeared on the scene magnesium flares were the main (and > best) light source for cave photography. Long before my time, of course (I > started caving in 1975), but I've been on at least two trips where we used Md > flares for photos. As Alan said - it's pretty impressive! > > Keith > ------Original Message------ > From: Lyndon Tiu > To: [email protected] > ReplyTo: Lyndon Tiu > Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Best Use of 'These Awful Movies > Sent: Jun 10, 2009 1:21 PM > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:16:00 -0500 [email protected] wrote: >> And many of those flares will burn when completely submerged in >> water.... OOoooo I am definitely bringing flares next time- the >> photography possibilities alone! > > Hmmm, interesting. > > Why I havn't seen one tells me either no one has tried or the last one who > tried choked on the smoke and did not get a good shot or got a good shot of a > lot of smoke and no cave. > > I wonder what the flare smoke contains? Carcinogens, CO2, CO, Ozone, etc ? > > I'd hate to be in a cave when someone lights one of these up and we would > choke on the smoke. > > -- > Lyndon Tiu > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Visit our website: http://texascavers.com > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T > > Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T --------------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our website: http://texascavers.com To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
