Oops, I seem to have gotten it backward. I should have read Mark's message before I wrote. Please don't send 1000 msgs telling me I'm wrong.
From: "Minton, Mark" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: [Texascavers] RE: Recycling
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:38:11 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from raistlin.wokka.org ([69.56.185.90]) by bay0-mc5-f13.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2668); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 07:38:28 -0700
Received: (qmail 26203 invoked by uid 89); 29 Oct 2007 14:38:30 -0000
Received: (qmail 26194 invoked by uid 31338); 29 Oct 2007 14:38:29 -0000
Denise said:>Recycling aluminum means less destruction of an in-place natural area, less waste in a landfill, and this seems extremely valuable to me whatever the exact amount of energy used to do this.Aluminum is one of the more economical things we can recycle. It is relatively expensive to produce because it uses a lot of electricity, and yet it is relatively easy to recycle. Probably makes more sense than recycling iron, for example.Mark Minton
