Tone,
 
To obtain a grant similar to the NSF 5-year, 2.4 million dollar grant mentioned 
in this article you would have to do the following:

1) Be accepted into graduate school in an appropriate scientific field;
2) Endure the low pay, long hours and little free time involved in the 
coursework and research to obtain your Ph.D.--this is where you first obtain 
training in writing and defending research grant proposals;
3) Spend 2-5+ years in one or more low paying, long hour, 
little-free-time-involved postdoctoral research positions prior to obtaining 
your first "permanent" position;
4) Get hired as an assistant professor at an academic research institution 
(odds are very low that you'll make it to this point, especially if you're 
female or a minority);
5) Write and submit a grant to the National Science Foundation and hope that 
the review committee deems your grant worthy of funding (fewer than 20% of 
these are now being funded, sometimes less than 15% in some fields);
6) Work like the devil to produce the research results that will get published 
in a world-class scientific research publication, otherwise they won't fund 
your next grant 5 years from now;
7) Frantically hope that your government doesn't decide that they should be 
spending their research dollars on wartime efforts and science that supports 
such activities, which would mean fewer dollars spent on your cherished topic 
of conservation (or basic and clinical medical research, etc.).

In point of fact, the current administration is actually doing what is outlined 
in point 7; for 2008, the budget proposal from the White House has left the 
budget for the National Institutes of Health at 2007 levels, and the 
biologically-related portions of the National Science Foundation did not 
increase. Big increases instead went to NSF, NIST (National Institute of 
Standards) and DOE (Department of Energy) programs related to physical sciences.
 
See the article in Chemical and Engineering News for a summary of the Bush 
proposal:

http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/85/i07/8507notw1.html

For a more detailed description of the administration's 2008 science budget 
request, go to the American Society of Microbiology Public and Scientific 
Policy web site:
 
http://www.asm.org/policy/
 
and download the "Guide to the Fiscal Year 2008 Research and Development and 
Public Health Agency Budgets" published on April 4, 2007.
 
Remember, these are just budget requests, and the Congress has the power to 
change things. You as a citizen have the power to contact your elected 
representatives and express your opinion on the matter.
 
Educate yourself about how your government chooses to allocate your taxpayer 
money, and if you don't agree with their plan, voice your opinion! It's the 
only way things will change.
 
Diana
 
P.S. I'm sorry I didn't answer your question about how to write grants without 
an academic research position; I'm not an expert on that topic.

Diana R. Tomchick 
Associate Professor 
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center 
Department of Biochemistry 
5323 Harry Hines Blvd. 
Dallas, TX 75061 
(214) 645-6383 


> >From: "Tone G" <[email protected]>
> >To: <[email protected]>
> >Date: July 09, 2007 05:09:28 AM PDT
> >Subject: Re: [Texascavers] Great article on the importance of bats in the DMN
> >
> >I see this was through an NSF 5-year grant.
> >
> >I am interested in learning more about grant writing, especially where
> >concerning conservation.  Can anyone suggest a starting point?
> >
> >\Tone
> > 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our website: http://texascavers.com
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to