This is why you don't want someone that knows nothing about caving as an editor of a caving publication.
Diana > On Jan 18, 2015, at 8:18 PM, Mark Minton via Texascavers > <texascavers@texascavers.com> wrote: > > My experience with reporters has generally been less accommodating than > George's. Most have not been willing to allow me to review their work > before publication. A couple of notable exceptions have been "The New > Yorker" and "National Geographic", both of which seem to be very > conscientious about fact checking and getting things right. > Unfortunately even then inaccuracies manage to make their way into the > final piece. I suspect that George and others are right - the subject > may be so foreign that they don't really understand the implications of > their errors, or care. Sigh. > > Mark Minton > mmin...@caver.net > >> On Sun, January 18, 2015 3:22 pm, George Veni via Texascavers wrote: >> >> ask to review the draft article for technical accuracy, > > _______________________________________________ > Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com > Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/ > http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers ________________________________ UT Southwestern Medical Center The future of medicine, today. _______________________________________________ Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/ http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers
