One might also be able in the future to use short video clips and/or photos to 
help locate a terminal survey station.

Diana

**************************************************
Diana R. Tomchick
Professor
Departments of Biophysics and Biochemistry
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
5323 Harry Hines Blvd.
Rm. ND10.214A
Dallas, TX 75390-8816
diana.tomch...@utsouthwestern.edu
(214) 645-6383 (phone)
(214) 645-6353 (fax)

> On Aug 20, 2015, at 10:55 PM, Mark Minton via Texascavers 
> <texascavers@texascavers.com> wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
>  I share your pain about recovering survey stations. I have been party to
> several connections that relied on old stations, usually carbided, but
> few people are equipped to mark such stations nowadays. As you pointed
> out, flagging tape is obviously not secure due to mice, crickets, etc.
> White-Out or nail polish seems to hold up well, but physical markers
> like metal tags or stakes is best. Bolts or even just bolt holes are
> also good, although the latter can be filled with mud after floods. It
> will be interesting to see how connections made years or even decades
> later are verified in the future.
>
>  I also share your concern about retaining project members long enough to
> preserve institutional memory. Not only are leads lost, but the route to
> leads is also lost. Leads that are obscure or only marginally obvious
> are especially difficult to relocate, since their significance may not
> be apparent even after a resurvey. Long-term participation and detailed
> survey notes and trip reports are key.
>
> Mark Minton
> mmin...@caver.net
>
> On Thu, August 20, 2015 6:08 pm, Crash Kennedy via Texascavers wrote:
>> A couple of weeks ago Yaz decided to visit her family in San Luis PotosiĀ­.
>> I was between projects and had some time on my hands.  So I got the wild
>> idea to head to Carta Valley for a week and survey as much of Punkin Cave
>> as I could. I talked to Ben Hutchins, who said he and Carrie were
>> interested, and he had some time available.  At the UT Grotto meeting I
>> got a few more hits, so the expedition was on!
>>
>> David Ochel said he could make it for the first part of the week.  We
>> both drove up Monday, got settled in to the cabin, worked on the outhouse
>> for a bit, and planned our strategy for the next day.  On Tuesday 4
>> August, David and I rigged the small entrance and were in the cave
>> relatively early.  We headed directly to some leads I had left from my
>> survey with Tone and Chains in June.  We quickly mopped up some leads,
>> determined that a few more needed a little shaving, and moved some rocks
>> so that I could retrieve the hammer I dropped in June.  We found several
>> more good leads that need additional work.  We also mapped the Neglected
>> Room that we (re-) found in June.  It had been previously discovered by
>> ZA survey team (G. Schindel, A. Schindel, and A. Croskrey) in March 2014,
>> but not surveyed.  We left a few hairy leads that were heading into blank
>> spots on the map, since there were just two of us and we had no backup.
>> All told, in 7 hours we made 19 shot for a total of 43.68m (or 2.30m per
>> shot).  We got out in time for an awesome dinner, movie, and gin & tonics.
>>
>> The next day, Wednesday, David had to leave, so I had the place to myself
>> until the next wave arrived that evening.  I worked on the outhouse some
>> more, repaired the two broken benches, and generally tidied up the cabin.
>> I took a nice walk, had a nap, and just generally read and relaxed.  After
>> a while Ben, Carrie, and Hazel Hutchins arrived from San Marcos, bringing
>> Ron Rutherford with them.  Dinner and drinks again ensued, and some more
>> incredible stargazing tool place, before everyone  got settled into their
>> respective rooms.
>>
>> Thursday morning, 6 August, dawned bright and early, as it is wont to do
>> in August.  Ben, Ron, and I headed back to the Neglected Room to mop up
>> some more remaining leads, while Carrie stayed cool in the cabin and
>> watched Hazel.  We first went to a lead off QB2 that looked like it
>> should connect to ZA8, which I enlarged on Tuesday.  Sure enough, we
>> found the awkward climb, shot three shots, and tied in to the 2014
>> station.  We were on a roll.  Next we mapped the obvious connection from
>> ZA6 to our AF50 from Tuesday.  13 more meters in the bag.  I talked Ben
>> into climbing up into a small lead that David and I passed on, and we got
>> another 5m.  Meanwhile, Ron was working on some good breakdown leads at
>> the edge of the known map, but couldn't quite make them go.  Ben and I
>> mapped another short connection, QB6 to ZA5.  We then surveyed down into
>> a big hall at the end of Matt and Saj's survey from June.  This room
>> (Refrigerator Room) was super cold, with a very strong breeze blowing out
>> of a too-tight hole through which we could see big blackness.  We'll have
>> to come back with better tools, as this goes off the map in a very good
>> direction.  One short side passage off the Refrigerator Room was
>> completed, then we packed up and headed down to Windy City.  There, off
>> of WM28, David and I found some unsurveyed leads that we tackled to
>> finish out our day.  Ron got excluded from part of the passage, but we
>> eventually mapped 24m in this area before everything got too tight.  When
>> we got back and plotted out surveys, it was clear that we were heading
>> south along the western flank of the cave, towards the Mortuary Room
>> surveys.  Could we possibly attack it from that side as well?  We ended
>> the 8-hour day after 36 shots, having put 79.43m in the survey book
>> (2.21m per shot).
>>
>> On Friday 7 August our ranks were reinforced by the arrival of Tom Rogers
>> and Amy Morton.  Carrie once again baby-sat while the five remaining went
>> back in the cave.  This time we headed towards the Mortuary Room, but
>> somehow got off the Z survey (which we wanted) and onto the original R
>> survey by way of some unmapped connections.  I guess we'll have to mop up
>> those one day.  We were looking for a lead marked on the survey notes at
>> Z6.  But instead, I found an obvious lead at R9.  R9 was from a survey I
>> did in March of 2005, and I marked the station with soot from my carbide
>> lamp.  Good thing, since it lasted all these years and we could relocate
>> it.  The lead trended north along the west wall, right towards where we
>> left off the day before.  The lower level eventually died, but we started
>> working on an upper lead that needed some rock removal.  Eventually Ben,
>> Amy, and Tom slid through.  I hurt a rib while hammering, and never was
>> able to push through.  I turned over the survey book to Ben.  Meanwhile,
>> Amy found a tube heading up, and could see daylight.  I retreated back to
>> the Entrance Room, and eventually found Amy's tube by calling back and
>> forth.  It was full of old sticks, which acted like a dam, holding back
>> bushels and bushels of guano.  I removed the sticks, choking and swearing.
>> The turned into a really easy bypass to the crawl at which Ron was still
>> hammering.  I slid down, Amy climbed up, and Ron hauled all the remaining
>> packs back to the Entrance Room.  Tom, Ben, and I finished the survey of
>> the lower passages and then up Guano Falls, as we named the tube.  It was
>> early, but we were trashed from all the pounding, climbing, and guano, so
>> we left after only 7 hours.  We surveyed 77.36m in 31 shots that day,
>> averaging 2.50m per shot.  A very good day.
>>
>> The Hays County crew packed up and left, so there were only three of us
>> left.  On Saturday 8 August we decided to go back to the Z survey again,
>> armed with the old survey notes.  But first we detoured to the Mortuary
>> Room, so Tom and Amy could check on any leads left.  They decided, like
>> we did once or twice before, that there really are none.  We climbed up
>> into the Z survey this time, instead of down like we did on Friday. We
>> had a really hard time finding the survey stations, because the crew that
>> surveyed the Trick or Treat Climb (Z survey) in March of 2007 only put
>> very small marks on the walls and no labels.  They probably wrote labels
>> on flagging tape and put it near the stations, but all that remained
>> after the cave crickets chewed it up was tiny little orange plastic
>> fragments.  This really was a good lesson about how to mark and not mark
>> stations for a long-term survey project like this.  We mapped some
>> branching tubes in the boneyard maze off Z3, but never really figured out
>> where Z6 was.  We'll probably have to re-create  a part of the Z survey
>> to relocate that station on a future survey.  We poked around the top of
>> the Z survey seeing a bunch of (apparently) unsurveyed stuff, and wrapped
>> up by shooting two shots into a previously-overlooked hole in the wall of
>> the Entrance Room.  I had offered to lead the twosome through the Western
>> Maze, into Area 51, and back out through Superstition, but none of us
>> were really feeling it.  So after only 4.5 hours, we exited, derigged the
>> cave, had a celebratory beer, and headed back to the cabin.  We only
>> added another 13 shots and 26.83m (2.06m per shot).
>>
>> So this was an experiment of sorts for me.  The last expedition, in June,
>> had 22 surveyors on 5 teams, and added 115.01m to the cave's length.
>> Coordinating that many people and teams is a lot of effort.  In contrast,
>> we had 6 people this time on 4 teams, and added 219.52m  Obviously, it was
>> much more efficient.  There are still a lot of leads left in the cave, but
>> it will take meticulous surveyors to check and map every one, and not just
>> go charging off in the most obvious ones.  We never did connect the West
>> Maze with Mortuary.  The cave just seems to fill with tiny cemented
>> breakdown in that area.  But we certainly filled in a big gap on the map
>> there, from both directions.  Right now the cave stands at 4967.1m, with
>> only 33m more necessary to break the 5km threshold.  And we are only 48m
>> from regaining a spot back on list of the the top 10 longest caves in
>> Texas (bumping off Longhorn).  Two great milestones for the next trip!
>>
>> Here are some more statistics that I just worked up.  There have been 104
>> individual cavers participating in the 24 survey expeditions to date.
>> Four of those did not enter the cave and survey, so there are 100 cavers
>> so far contributing to what we know of the cave.  Out of those, I have
>> been on the most trips (23), followed by Don Arburn (14), Lee Jay Graves
>> (14), Matt Zappitello (10), Arron Wertheim (8), Saj Zappitello (8), Ann
>> Scott (7), Chris Vreeland (7), Geary Schindel (7), Tone Garot (6), Bonnie
>> Longley (6), Galen Falgout (6), Lydia Hernandez (6), Gary Franklin (6),
>> David Ochel (6), Matt Turner (5), Yazmin Avila (5), Dale Barnard (5),
>> Matt Zaldivar (4), and Wes Schumacher (4).  That means that only 20% of
>> all the surveyors in Punkin have been there 4 or more times, which isn't
>> enough to really get to know an area and what has been surveyed and what
>> hasn't.  AND to know where that part of the cave is in relation to the
>> rest of the cave.  We have no end of enthusiastic volunteers eager to
>> sign up for trips, but damn few trip leaders that can get their team to
>> their objectives.  So it is clear that we need more people to take on
>> parts of the cave, learn them well, and push the hell out of them.  It is
>> also pretty close to the time when we will have to go into certain leads
>> and shave them to see where they go. Before, there was always the hope
>> that another passage would just bypass a restriction, and get at it from
>> another direction.  Now, it appears that there are certain stratigraphic
>> and structural controls that "box in" the cave in certain directions.
>> There is still tremendous airflow, so we know we haven't see all the cave
>> has to offer.  (FYI, I estimate probably at least another kilometer of
>> just mop-up survey in known passage.)  There are huge lift tubes coming
>> in to the cave from below, but they all get too tight or are cemented
>> with calcite, but still blow air.  The cave has been a fascinating puzzle
>> to try to unravel, and I'm not done with it yet.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com
> Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
> http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers


________________________________

UT Southwestern


Medical Center



The future of medicine, today.

_______________________________________________
Texascavers mailing list | http://texascavers.com
Texascavers@texascavers.com | Archives: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/texascavers@texascavers.com/
http://lists.texascavers.com/listinfo/texascavers

Reply via email to