OK, "yum clean all" seems to help. Thanks. On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Jindrich Novy <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Bradley, > > On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:19:12PM -0400, Bradley C. Kuszmaul wrote: > > After upgrading to FC17 from FC16 with preupgrade, I ran into some > > difficulties, so I removed the texlive 2011 installation and reinstalled > > the FC 16 texlive 2007 installation. > > > > Then I did this: > > > > $ sudo rpm -i > > > http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2012/packages.fc17/texlive-release.noarch.rpm > > > > and then > > > > $ sudo yum install texlive > > > > which failed. > > > > For example, it tries to find > > > http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2012/packages.fc17/texlive-texinfo-2008_04_18.10.svn26886-1.noarch.rpm > > but the proper URL appears to be > > > http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2012/packages.fc17/tex-texinfo-2008_04_18.10.svn26886-1.noarch.rpm > > > > At least, the tex-* version exists, whereas the texlive-* version does > not. > > Works for me. Have you tried yum clean all before the update? It seems > yum uses old metadata. > > > > > Some files start with tex-* and some with texlive-*, but it isn't > > consistent. > > It actually is as tex-* prefixed packages come from CTAN and texlive-* > prefixed from TeX Live SVN (binaries). > > Jindrich > > -- > Jindrich Novy <[email protected]> http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ > Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá, > kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není člověk, to je vůl. > --- Jan Werich >
_______________________________________________ TeXLive mailing list [email protected] http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive
