On Sun, 2012-07-01 at 23:26 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: > Hi Ankur, Hello Jindrich,
> > On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 03:54:00PM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Since detex is already provided by the texlive repos, should I > retire > > the package[1] from Fedora? > > It depends also on your decision. If you think it is better to have > only one (texlive) version of detex then I don't object. I think this would be better since I expect the detex that is released with the texlive distribution to stay more up to date, and more in sync. I see no point in us having two binaries. It would only confuse users IMO. I'll get the package retirement process started. Thanks for your work Jindrich! :) -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur: "FranciscoD" Please only print if necessary. Looking to contribute to Fedora? Look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ TeXLive mailing list [email protected] http://www.linux.cz/mailman/listinfo/texlive
