Quoting Joris van der Hoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:39:10PM +0200, Alvaro Tejero Cantero wrote: > > > If you are in a hurry, I recommend to convert your image into one > > > of a slightly lower resolution, if possible. > > > > I am unlucky, the structures appearing are very fine and I cannot > therefore > > escape this order of magnitude in the size of the plot. The only > other > > possibility (but it involves a great deal of work) would be to break > up the > > image into a mosaic, and place all the bits together inside a TeXmacs > figure. > > Can you please make the image available on the web. This will allow > me to play around with it and I will try to quickly find a solution. > I might try to see whether I can bypass scheme and remain entirely > inside C++. > This should be possible, since we are dealing with postscript > graphics, > which require no conversions.
I just managed to produce a much smaller version ~2M that will be sufficient (fortunately!). Although for less complex figures contour plots yield smaller files, for the ones I was plotting now density plots are better. I also received one suggestion to rasterize the postscript images through gs, though I didn't try it. I can, still, make an image of this kind available on the web for debugging purposes. I am very thankful for your assistance, 'Alvaro. > There is still another thing you may try: > > (debug-set! stack 100000000) > > in progs/kernel/boot/compat.scm. Please let me know whether this > helps. > > Best wishes, Joris > > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev > Alvaro Tejero Cantero Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics Ludwig-Maximilian Universitaet Muenchen _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
