Alvaro Tejero Cantero wrote:
No, no no!!! please, use reasonable defaults and give then extra possibilities to the advanced users. Otherwise, to rotate something becomes tedious. The standard behaviour (see Inkscape) is:
In fact, the *real* solution to these kinds of problems would be to provide a completely user-redefineable interface system. Ideally, the users themselves would be able to define the interface they want. And this is not only interesting for the narrow domain of editing in TeXmacs, this is the best approach for any kind of software ; it is my firm opinion that in general, this divide between the users and the implementers is a Bad Thing, and really removing this divide is what could be called doing one more step in the direction of Real Software Freedom (TM) :-). Most of the time, unfortunately, Free Software projects realize only a small fraction of the full potential of Free Software. To do this is little bit more long-term goal, unfortunately, because it becomes only possible when the user-tinkereable parts of the software have been cleanly and completely extracted. To state it otherwise, one cannot do it before the software has really reached an ueber-stable state (in this respect, we are just reaching the level of the version 1, currently, so...). Best, Henri _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
