On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 05:45:53PM +0100, Henri Lesourd wrote: > Joris van der Hoeven wrote: > >That was not the question which was raised at the very start. > > > For sure, it was : the lack of such a function is the > very reason why it is necessary to speak about using > paths for accessing the set of buffers. Otherwise, there > would be no need to speak about paths at all (except > for other unrelated things which have their own logic, > like the (insert-go-to ...)).
NO, IT WAS NOT: > I'am trying to write an extension which uses Prolog. At the moment I want to > understand how I can access the active Document in Scheme. > ---------------------------------------------- > I found the-buffer in a discussion. I tried to use it but got an unbound > variable > error. Is there a module I need to load? Can anybody give me a hint how to > use tree_to_texmacs? What I need is to transform the tree to a Prolog > representation without losing the information on the origanl tree, so that I > can send back editing commands to texmacs. The function buffer-tree does exactly this. Obtaining a list of all buffer would be an interesting other function, but this was NOT the question. _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
