Joris van der Hoeven wrote:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 04:48:23PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
I agree to make the default TeXmacs behaviour more standard and
provide an option for Emacs compatability. This should become part
of a more global reorganization of the interface behaviour.
Anyway, please improve your patches as much as you can;
I will apply them when coming to the interface standardization.
Right now, the patches are done rather ad-hoc with the intention to
improve the behavior as much as possible with as little changes to the
code as possible. For full standard compliance with either Windows or
Emacs behavior, the internals of the selection/buffer handling should
probably be redesigned. Otherwise, I fear that further improvement of
the behavior can only be achieved by ugly hacks.
Greetings,
Norbert
B.t.w: the correct spelling is "compatibility" - the misspelled version
appears in the TeXmacs documentation as well. Indeed it is generally
spread all over the web: (google: "compatibility" 104 Mio. vs.
"compatability" 3.9 Mio)
_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
