Hello Joris, I will use your second suggestion and replace the string directly.
Best regards Michael 2007/9/11, Joris van der Hoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 12:20:03PM +0200, Michael Klein wrote: > > I want to split an atomic tree into different parts. The routine > tree-split > > does not quite work as I expected. What must I do if I not only want to > > split the atomic tree but want to have both parts displayed again? I > want to > > later modify only one of them by replacing it with a <my-macro|it>. I > tried > > (tree-split my-path 1 1) on a <section|The Theory of Ordinals> and got > > <section|T|he Theory of Ordinals> and this is diplayed as a T. Is there > a > > higher level routine? > > Please give a more explicit example of what you want to do. > > I also recall that tree-split is a low-level tree modification routine. > When splitting a string, a new argument gets inserted into the parent tag > (section in your case); what else to do? If your aim was to insert > something > like a fraction in between, then you should first replace your string s > by (concat s) and then split it twice. > > However, it is easier to directly use the tree-set routine and > replace your string s by (concat s1 (fraction "" "") s2), for instance. > The only reason why you might want to use a low-level routine tree-split > is to keep a very precise control over the cursor. > > Best wishes, Joris > > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev >
_______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
