On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 10:54:11PM +0100, Henri Lesourd wrote: > But as soon as your LaTeX is clean (i.e. : it uses only macros built > on a set of clean primitives), then if the import is not absolutely > perfect right now (although it is already quite good), it can > definitely be lead to the point of perfection, it's just a matter of > time (and contributions ;-). > [snip] > work for identifying a *clean* subset of TeX / LaTeX, and implement > this "perfect subset" of TeX / LaTeX flawlessly.
I have posted to Scott's blog for details on what went wrong with importing his LaTeX. (I have, I hope, been careful to avoid making any promises. I certainly don't want to appear to be speaking on behalf of the TeXmacs devs.) I believe maths publishers are often quite strict about what macro packages they will accept, so their requirements could be starting point for identifying a useful "clean LaTeX". Regards, Jeremy Henty _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
