Henri Lesourd wrote:
Probably under Linux it works most of the time,
_always_
and under windows it's more often broken:
MSVC is really the defacto standard (KDE, python, LyX, etc all use it). I don't see the problem here. In any case, I think, but I am not sure, Borland and Intel compilers are compatible while Mingw's g++-3.2 is not (not sure about recent version of g++). So yes, I think that choosing either MSVC or Mingw would be a hard requirement for plugin developer. Or you can just see those two compilers as two different platforms and deliver a TeXMacs binary for both. That is exactly what the KDE on Windows people do by the way.
Or perhaps do you have some other interesting new information about C++ which could cure my doubts ?
I hope my argument above did so. I don't think that imposing a compiler for plugin development is a very hard requirement, especially nowadays where you can have free (as in beer) compiler on all platforms.
Abdel. _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
