Wolfgang Jansen wrote:
Henri Lesourd wrote:
Another thing is that your patch should
really *fix* the problems: it means that
there should remain no compilation errors,
and that the software should work as expected.
All bugs to fix is impossible.
First, there occurs one bug after the other.
Second and more importantly, the bug found
last is a missing type definition
(may be a typedef, a class, or something else).
It is not possible to guess the developers' intention.
To summarize (and gently conclude this
discussion):
1. Bugs which happen one after the other or
missing developer's intention is one thing
one can live with, especially when you only
want to solve a compilation problem ;
2. Missing type definition is a problem in
the makefile, for it is certainly not the
case that a definition is really missing ;
=> Thank you very much for your contribution. Now
there are lots of informations about this Sun
related problems. We will need to find the time
and access to a Sun system to investigate this ;
Regards, Henri
_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
