On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 10:52, Alvaro Tejero Cantero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> http://code.google.com/apis/v8/intro.html > > > > I cannot see how this is relevant at all to TeXmacs. > > > > (snip) > > > It would be more sensible to port TeXmacs to another scripting language. > > This would avoid a dramatic increase in the overall complexity of the > > system. > > You said it. > I do not believe that porting TeXmacs to another scripting language would be a good idea on its own. It beats adding language-to-scheme converters, but only in the way that "questionable" beats "misguided".
_______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
