I am very happy with mercurial. It is easy and well documented. Otherwise I have a slight preference for using git over bzr if only because it seems that it has more momentum in the community. One should also maybe consider the hosting options à la github.com, sharesource.org, etc, but I am not versed in them.
Álvaro. On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 13:41, Gubinelli Massimiliano<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > to by any means an attempt to start a flame war. I'm just looking at DCVS > to experiment a bit with them for TeXmacs developement. > I would like to be able to checkout and commit from the svn repository and > locally use bzr or git for my experimental branches and maybe to publish > some experimental branch before committing the result to the main svn repo. > I've looked at the two main candidates (bzr and git) and it seems to me > that bzr is more easygoing and offers better integration with svn. > > In particular I like: > > * direct branching from the svn repo (bzr branch > svn+shh://svn.sv.gnu.org/texmacs/trunk/src) > * possibility to publish branches on a server without having bzr installed > on the server (using only sftp) > > cons: > * bzr is slow in branching the svn repo (\sim 10 minutes operation for > trunk/src on my Mac) > > > Do others have some advice on the choice of DCVS (keeping in mind that for > the moment I do not think that it is useful to replace svn as the main CVS > for TeXmacs)? > > thanks, > Best > Massimiliano Gubinelli > > PS: I'm restarting to commit changes to the TeXmacs repository since it > seems OK (only two revisions get lost due to the Savannah problems and they > can be recommited using Joris' and mine working copies). > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev > _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
