I get the correct answers; here TeXmacs 1.0.7.2. -á.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:05, Corcelle <[email protected]> wrote: > Scheme] (/ +2i -i) > #.##.#i > Scheme] (/ 1+2i -i) > #.##.#i > Scheme] (/ 1+2i 2-i) > 0.0+1.0i yes ! > > I'm lost. Voodoo could be a solution. > Perhaps, someone else could try this "Scheme]" talk with us. > I'll try with other versions of TeXmacs. > > Thanks again to have tried this. > > Emmanuël > > > ----- "bytecolor" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> De: "bytecolor" <[email protected]> >> À: [email protected] >> Envoyé: Mardi 15 Septembre 2009 20h48:19 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / >> Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne >> Objet: Re: [Texmacs-dev] Problem of division in scheme. >> >> Scheme] (/ +2i -i) >> -2.0 >> Scheme] >> >> -- >> bytecolor (S. Edward Dolan) >> >> >> --- On Tue, 9/15/09, Corcelle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > From: Corcelle <[email protected]> >> > Subject: Re: [Texmacs-dev] Problem of division in scheme. >> > To: [email protected] >> > Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 11:32 AM >> > With the same version of guile and >> > TeXmacs, I have : >> > - in a terminal : -2.0 >> > - in a scheme session in TeXmacs (and with background >> > calculus within TeXmacs) : #.##.#i >> > >> > Is it the same for you ? >> > >> > Thank you for your answer. >> > >> > Emmanuël >> > >> > > >> > > Hello Corcelle, >> > > >> > > I get -2.0. in texmacs and guile in a term. >> > > >> > > guile version 1.8.5 >> > > texmacs version 1.0.7.2 >> > > >> > > -- >> > > bytecolor (S. Edward Dolan) >> > > >> > > >> > > --- On Tue, 9/15/09, Corcelle <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > > > From: Corcelle <[email protected]> >> > > > Subject: [Texmacs-dev] Problem of division in >> > scheme. >> > > > To: [email protected] >> > > > Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 5:27 AM >> > > > Hello, >> > > > >> > > > I'm currently working on an extension of the >> > graphics mode >> > > > which needs calculus in scheme in the >> > background. >> > > > I have a little problem with the calculus of, for >> > example >> > > > : >> > > > (/ +2i -i) >> > > > which gives >> > > > #.##.#i >> > > > Is it a known problem in scheme or with TeXmacs >> > ? >> > > > Do you know a workaround ? >> > > > >> > > > Have a good day. >> > > > >> > > > Emmanuël >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > Texmacs-dev mailing list >> > > > [email protected] >> > > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Texmacs-dev mailing list >> > > [email protected] >> > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Texmacs-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Texmacs-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev > _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
