On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:36:18PM +0200, Gubinelli Massimiliano wrote: > Hi Joris, > > On 24 sept. 09, at 22:34, Joris van der Hoeven wrote: > > >Hi Max, > > > >No, everything works fine on my postscript laser printer... > > > > Indeed it is strange since (at least before summer) I didn't have this > problem. And the problem is present only when I print the files > (unfortunately I do not have other printer for testing). To remove it > I actually replaced the problematic fonts in TeXmacs/fonts/type1/ec/ > (essentially ecbi10.pfb, ecbx12.pfb and ecti10.pfb by equivalent > version obtained by reencoding some of the Latin Modern fonts. This > make me think about the fact that this replacement can be pushed into > the standard distribution since the Latin Modern version of CM have > more compact representation than the default TeXmacs ec*.pfb fonts > (which as far as I understand are obtained by tracing the MetaFont > generated CM font bitmaps). Do you think this is possible in full > generality? Latin Modern contains a lot of gliphs and my replacements > seems to work fine.
Yes, we can consider this kind of replacement ... when we come to the reorganization of fonts. Let us first complete the Qt port ;^) Best wishes, --Joris _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
