I'm still not quite sure that the specific problem I'm looking at is due to continuations. I agree that for the overall robustness of the code we should get rid of the continuation stuff (nice idea but problematic in contact with C++ as I only now realize). If I have time I will try to replace the continuation code with a system based on closures (i.e. explicit continuations).
m On 22 déc. 2010, at 17:19, Joris van der Hoeven wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:25:59PM +0100, Gubinelli Massimiliano wrote: >> I think that the bug I'm referring to is quite serious and I would like to >> get rid of it as soon as possible. I do not know why such kind of problems >> do not show up also in the X11 code. > > If you have some energy to spend on this issue, you might try to rewrite > most of the file tm-dialogue.scm using closures instead of continuations, > and maybe some of the code which depends on it, if you want to make some > syntactical changes. For the moment, dialogues are rarely nested > (maybe only at one or two places), so you may deal with these cases manually, > and make the existing syntax work in the most straightforward cases. > > Best, --Joris > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
