Seems reasonable enough. Then what's needed is some changes to the scheme interface, namely some export-file function or something like that, and an "export as" dialog using the native dialogs. If you would be so kind Joris as to give the former some thought I can implement the latter (it's mostly or completely there already, anyway)
Regards, ________________ Miguel de Benito. On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 23:10, Gubinelli Massimiliano <[email protected] > wrote: > I think we should not assimilate save and export. we can have a generic > export command which opens a dialog where it is possible to choose the > export format. But export is inehertly unidirectional while save is meant to > preserve the document integrity. > max > > > > > On 25 déc. 2010, at 16:19, Joris van der Hoeven <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 05:37:02PM +0300, Victor Porton wrote: >> >>> Then I suggest an alternative: >>> >>> Add choosing of several sub-formats in "Export as LaTeX" dialog. >>> >> >> Yes, that would be more in the spirit of the upcoming changes. >> Unfortunately, we discovered that the file chooser dialogues are >> not very customizable. I actually would have liked to remove >> the export and import menus alltogether and add a "format" field >> to the open/save dialogue. So I am not sure what we will be able to do. >> >> Best, --Joris >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Texmacs-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev >
_______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
