On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Carter, Nathan <ncar...@bentley.edu> wrote: > >> Yes, it is very modular. You take TeXmacs, and you have the editor, >> without additional dependencies. >> >> I'm sorry for this joke ;-) > > Hehe. Maybe this means I need to clarify my original question. > > By "math editor" I mean *not* the document editor, but specifically that > portion of it that edits mathematical formulas. Or perhaps it's all the same > widget? If I'm not asking the right questions, feel free to correct me. >
I think a meaningful separation would be a major effort, but I'm not a developer so we better wait for their answer. It is still valuable to consider this although (or even if) a modular design would be worse than an integrated design. _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
