On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:20:49AM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> Good... because the generated .eps from gs>9.0 are massive but imagemagick
> does a decent job. (gs folks will add an epswrite target sometime later).

I might have to write these guys a long email once with a list of points
which are problematic from our perspective (the Pdfmark support is also
not yet perfect).

Best, --Joris

_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev

Reply via email to