On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:20:49AM +0100, Sam Liddicott wrote: > Good... because the generated .eps from gs>9.0 are massive but imagemagick > does a decent job. (gs folks will add an epswrite target sometime later).
I might have to write these guys a long email once with a list of points which are problematic from our perspective (the Pdfmark support is also not yet perfect). Best, --Joris _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev