Define-syntax at docs.racket-lang.org/quick/ reminds me of drd's

Sam
On Jan 27, 2012 10:06 AM, "Alvaro Tejero Cantero" <alv...@minin.es> wrote:

> Racket, formerly known as  PLT Scheme, seems to receive a lot of
> attention from users and developers:
>
> http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?RacketLanguage
>
> http://racket-lang.org/
>
>
> -รก.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 07:42, Joris van der Hoeven
> <vdhoe...@texmacs.org> wrote:
> > Hi Karl,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 02:46:48PM -0700, Karl Hegbloom wrote:
> >> I'm wondering if anyone is presently working on patching TeXmacs so
> that it
> >> will build and run with Guile 2.0. In the Guile-2.0 NEWS file, I see
> that
> >> "The GH interface (deprecated in version 1.6, 2001) was removed."
> TeXmacs
> >> fails to build because it's looking for <guile/gh.h> which is no longer
> >> present.
> >
> > Yes, I am aware of the problem, but I have not really been working on it
> yet.
> > Guile induces a *lot* of problems at the moment and it is not even clear
> that
> > we really want to go all the way to Guile 2.*. On the one hand, it is
> true that
> > Guile 2.0 includes a much faster byte code interpreter. On the other
> hand though,
> > Guile is growing more and more maximalistic: the number of dependencies
> is
> > going out of hand, making portability a major concern. Also, Guile 2.0
> > now relies on Boehm GC for garbage collection; having used this garbage
> > collector in another project, I am very suspicious and fear that this
> move
> > may introduce subtle bugs and make code harder to debug. I have discussed
> > these issues on the GNU developers list and the Guile developers are
> willing
> > to make things a little bit better. Yet, it is not clear at all that this
> > will be enough. Massimiliano has started to look for possible
> replacements
> > of Guile. Another solution would be to stick to an old version, include
> > the sources with TeXmacs and take care of maintainance issues ourselves.
> >
> > Best wishes, --Joris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Texmacs-dev mailing list
> > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Texmacs-dev mailing list
> Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev

Reply via email to