Hi,

Le Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:58:23 +0200,
Massimiliano Gubinelli <m.gubine...@gmail.com> a écrit :

>  great to see some work on this side. I started to port to Guile 2.0
> some time ago, first by changing the C++ side to make it compile with
> Guile-2. This was done.

Ok. I saw this. That's why I told you about it.

> I stopped when I realized that there should
> have been deep changes in the Scheme side to accomodate the
> Compile/Run 2 phases of interpretation of Guile-2 and all the module
> system which is incompatible with this approach. I wanted to modify
> the TeXmacs module system to be compatible with the 2 phases but my
> proficiency in scheme is not enough. In many points there are
> assumptions about code being run while interpreting the sources and
> this would have to be modified in Guile-2 since this code is not run
> but kept there until execution which then imply that further
> compilation will happen in the wrong environment. 
> 
> I'm interested in following the developements and also there were
> another person (Mike Gran) how was similarly interested. 

Ok. I will work on this with low priority, but I expect to give at
least 2-3 hours a week on this task. Maybe we can expect to have
something working before Christmas...

François

-- 
François Poulain <fpoul...@metrodore.fr>

_______________________________________________
Texmacs-dev mailing list
Texmacs-dev@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev

Reply via email to