Hi, Le Wed, 27 May 2015 09:12:13 +0200, Miguel de Benito Delgado <[email protected]> a écrit :
> This is due to some recent hack to fix CPU issues on some systems and > some implementations of usleep() (I guess). I don't know what is done with usleep and since when, but it should be replaced by nanosleep. In the usleep manpage (linux), you can read : "POSIX.1-2001 declares this function obsolete; use nanosleep(2) instead. POSIX.1-2008 removes the specification of usleep()." François -- François Poulain <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
