At this initial stages I would prefer to concentrate on content creation and leave only one channel for contributions. We can worry about people which do not feel like spending time understand git later. It maybe be considered even a filter for removing shallow contributions. Like what happens with PR I would like a way to give feedback to the contributor, and email is not optimal for that.
Since everybody can fork and do whatever her wants with it, I do not see concrete problems. You can very well see on the forum that the number of active and knowledgeable users is quite small. Max > On 11. Nov 2020, at 20:25, Giovanni Piredda <pired...@posteo.de> wrote: > > Given the consensus that the blog should be moderated - > > it could be good to provide two channels for submission of content: > > - the pull requests > > - an email address > > with the qualification that the email address should not be used for > incremental submissions but for complete articles (so that revisions may take > just a small effort). > > One could ask authors to send their articles either using one of the standard > TeXmacs styles or notes.ts (it is also an occasion to tell again that > typesetting in TeXmacs is controlled by style files). > > G. > > > _______________________________________________ > Texmacs-dev mailing list > Texmacs-dev@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev _______________________________________________ Texmacs-dev mailing list Texmacs-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/texmacs-dev
