Noah Kantrowitz-3 wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:th-users- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rowan >> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 2:04 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [th-users] trac-hacks.org on Trac 0.11 - release candidate >> 1 >> >> >> >> Christian Boos wrote: >> > >> >>What could also be done is to move all the plugins not modified since >> 3 >> >>or 4 years into an /inactive folder with the same internal structure. >> It >> >>should be possible to revive a plugin in a similar way than it is >> today >> >>to "adopt-a-hack", moving it away of /inactive. Conversely, once a >> year >> >>move there the plugins who just entered their 3rd or 4th year of bit >> rot... >> >> >> >>That would also clarify things and avoid having too big folders even >> in >> >>the new scheme (the plugin/ folder in particular). >> > >> >> Christian beat me to it on the inactive plugins idea, I think it's a >> great >> addition it will also make adopting a hack easier and quicker if a >> plugin is >> inactive and someone requests adoption you can do it immediately. > > Though a distinction needs to be made between a plugin that is inactive > and > one that is simply "done". I have a lot of plugins that will probably > never > see another commit (barring compat issues) because they only have one > feature and that feature is completed. > > --Noah >
Good point, maybe once per year an email could be sent to the hack maintainers asking them to state if a hack is active or not, if no response is given or a negative response is received the hack could be put in the inactive directory. ~Rowan -- View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/trac-hacks-org-on-Trac-0-11-release-candidate-1-tp74447p97767.html Sent from the th-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ th-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.trac-hacks.org/mailman/listinfo/th-users
