Subject: Physics?





  






>
>
>  
>The following concerns a question in a physics degree exam at the University 
>of Copenhagen : 
>
>
>'Describe how to determine the height of a skyscraper using a Barometer ?'
>One student replied :-
>'You tie a long piece of string to the neck of the barometer, then lower the 
>barometer from the roof of the skyscraper to the ground. The length of the 
>string plus the length of the barometer will equal the height of the building.'
>
>This highly original answer so incensed the examiner that the student was 
>failed.
>
>The student appealed on the grounds that his answer was indisputably correct, 
>and the university appointed an independent arbiter to decide the case.
>
>The arbiter judged that the answer was indeed correct, but did not display any 
>noticeable knowledge of physics.
>
>To resolve the problem it was decided to call the student in and allow him six 
>minutes in which to provide a verbal answer which showed at least a minimal 
>familiarity the basic principles of physics.
>
>For five minutes the student sat in silence, forehead creased in thought.
>
>The arbiter reminded him that time was running out, to which the student 
>replied that he had several extremely relevant answers, but couldn't make up 
>his mind which to use.
>
>On being advised to hurry up the student replied as follows:
>
>'Firstly, you could take the barometer up to the roof of the skyscraper, drop 
>it over the edge, and measure the time it takes to reach the ground. The 
>height of the building can then be worked out from the formula H = 0.5g x t 
>squared. But bad luck on the barometer.'
>
>'Or if the sun is shining you could measure the height of the barometer, then 
>set it on end and measure the length of its shadow. Then you measure the 
>length of the skyscraper's shadow, and thereafter it is a simple matter of 
>proportional arithmetic to work out the height of the skyscraper.'
>
>'But if you wanted to be highly scientific about it, you could tie a short 
>piece of string to the barometer and swing it like a pendulum, first at ground 
>level and then on the roof of the skyscraper. The height is worked out by the 
>difference in the gravitational restoring force T = 2 pi sq root (l / g).'
>
>'Or if the skyscraper has an outside emergency staircase, it would be easier 
>to walk up it and mark off the height of the skyscraper in barometer lengths, 
>then add them up.'
>
>'If you merely wanted to be boring and orthodox about it, of course, you could 
>use the barometer to measure the air pressure on the roof of the skyscraper 
>and on the ground, and convert the difference in millibars, into feet to give 
>the height of the building.'
>
>'But since we are constantly being exhorted to exercise independence of mind 
>and apply scientific methods, undoubtedly the best way would be to knock on 
>the janitor's door and say to him, 'If you would like a nice new barometer, I 
>will give you this one if you tell me the height of this skyscraper'. '
>
>The student was Niels Bohr, the only person from Denmark to win the Nobel 
>prize for Physics 
>
>__._,_.___
>
>
>
> 
>__,_._,___ 

Reply via email to