hi 
an interesting piece is attached
have a nice day
regards
 
 
The story of Mahabali shows how subjectivity in measurement creates chaos 

BY Devdutt Pattanaik 



   IN THE HINDU MYTHIC world, the Devas live in the sky, the Manavas or humans 
live on the earth, and the Asuras live under the ground. In the 19thcentury, 
English scholars equated Devas with gods of Greek mythology and so the enemy of 
the Devas, the Asuras came to be described as the ‘demons’. 

   Unfortunately, there is nothing demonic about most Asuras, at least not in 
the Biblical sense of the term. Some European translators used other words like 
‘giants’ and ‘Titans’ and even ‘old gods’ to refer to Asuras, but these did not 
capture the what the Asuras were. This is what happens when one uses Greek or 
Biblical templates to explain Hindu mythic structures. As a result, even today, 
in modern comic books, Bali, or Mahabali, the great king of Asuras, is 
described 
as the demon-king, though mercifully they avoid depicting him with horns, which 
incidentally is a Persian visual metaphor for demons introduced by Mughal court 
painters. 

   Mahabhali was so great a king that he rose up from the subterranean realm of 
the Asuras, and went on to become became master of the three worlds — those 
above, those below and all that lay in between, displacing even Indra, king of 
the Devas. 

   This created chaos in the cosmos and the sages begged Vishnu, preserver of 
the universe, to intervene and restore order. Mahabali was impossible to defeat 
at war. The only way to defeat him was by cunning. Mahabali was known for his 
charitable nature, which is why he was much loved and difficult to overthrow. 
So 
Vishnu approached him in the form of a dwarf and asked Mahabali three paces of 
land, “enough for me to sleep on.” “Take it,” said Mahabali, without a second 
thought. Vishnu immediately turned into a giant. With one step, he claimed the 
sky, and gave it back to the Devas. With the second, he claimed the earth. With 
the third, he shoved Mahabali back to the realm under the ground where all 
Asuras belong. 

   The story draws attention to the notion of measurements. Vishnu asks for 
three paces of land. Mahabali gave it, without checking who would measure the 
paces. He assumed it was the dwarf, when in reality it was taken by a giant. 
Often when signing contracts, we assume measurements but when the time comes to 
settle, we are in for a surprise. 

   A classic example is when one buys a house — 1000 square feet means very 
different things to a buyer and a builder. One has terms like carpet area, 
built-up area, super built-up area, words that are so difficult for the common 
man to comprehend that in the end, the vast apartment of one’s imagination ends 
up becoming a tiny flat in reality, or should we say realty. 

   Another example is when one gets gifts valued at Rs 10,000. The cost of the 
gift, on bulk purchase, would be 30% or less of the MRP. The one who receives 
the gift is made to believe that the value is Rs 10,000 while the one who gives 
the gift knows the cost is Rs 3000. The beneficiary is happy so long as he does 
not know the measuring scale of the benefactor. 

   Sandeep was the owner of a firm that distributes mutual funds and insurance. 
He promised new agents a 3% bonus, if they sold an old slow-moving instrument 
to 
reach a particular target. Rajesh did reach the target and went to claim his 
bonus. He expected cash or cheque. Instead he was given a new fast-moving 
product, XYZ. “The margin of XYZ is 3% more than the standard rate. Just 
crosssell this product to clients who bought ABC and make your money,” said 
Sandeep. Rajesh could do nothing but nod his head. He had been paid 3% but not 
quite the way he assumed it. Like Mahabali, he did feel rather crushed. 

   Subjectivity in measurement creates chaos and problems. The Asuras are 
enemies of the Devas, but they are also worshipped: the rise and return of 
Mahabali is associated with harvest festivals in India such as Onam of Kerala 
and Diwali in the North. But the only way the European translators could 
‘measure’ the enemy of the gods was by calling them ‘demons’. What is often 
convenient for a few need not be correct or comprehensible for the rest. But we 
end up submitting to it. 

   The author is the Chief Belief Officer of the Future 
   Group. He can be reached at [email protected] 

Reply via email to