Published on Deccan Chronicle (http://www.deccanchronicle.com) 
 
 
Kashmir’s faultlines 


By By S.K. Sinha 



Sep 29 2010 


 

 

The Kashmir Valley has been burning for three months. Over 100 stone-pelting 
youth have got killed. Thanks to a governance deficit, both in Srinagar and 
Delhi, the situation appears out of control.

 

 

Zia-ul-Haq Islamised Pakistan and this spread to Kashmir. In 1990 there was 
ethnic cleansing of over three lakh Kashmiri Pandits and several dozen Hindu 
temples were destroyed, but the plight of Kashmiri Pandits was glossed over and 
there was a virtual blackout of information about the vandalising of dozens of 
temples. In 2007, to appease the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), the 
government took the bizarre decision of providing money for the families of 
terrorists killed in encounters with security forces. This does not happen 
elsewhere in India or anywhere else in the world. 

 

 

To appease the National Conference (NC), the government is now considering its 
demand for autonomy — the Supreme Court, the Election Commission and the 
Comptroller and Auditor General would not have any jurisdiction in Kashmir, 
there would be an elected governor from the state and no Central services, like 
IAS and IPS. The PDP, under the garb of self-rule, wants dual currency and a 
joint state legislature with Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) in Kashmir. 
Perhaps then the “misguided” young boys in terrorist camps in PoK would also be 
allowed to return. All this will severely undermine India’s sovereignty in 
Kashmir. 

 

 

Pakistan launched repeated conventional wars to grab Kashmir but failed each 
time. Since 2008, religious frenzy has been aroused and mass upsurges organised 
on the basis of manufactured lies. In 2008, a 100-acre of barren land at 
Baltal, traditionally used as a base camp for Amarnath pilgrims, was diverted 
to the Shrine Board for `2.2 crore. Since ownership remained with the state, 
the board could put up only prefabricated shelters. This land is unapproachable 
and uninhabitable for eight months in a year due to snow and yet a canard was 
spread that Hindus were being brought to settle in Baltal and change the 
demography of the Valley, like Israel had done in Palestine. A mass movement of 
gigantic dimensions erupted. To appease the agitators, the government cancelled 
the land diversion order and ordered the virtual disbandment of the Shrine 
Board. After three months of counter-agitation in Jammu, status quo ante was 
restored. In 2009, two women drowned in a river at Shopian. A mass movement was 
started on the basis of diabolical concoction of facts about the women being 
raped and killed by security personnel. Fraudulent medical reports were 
prepared and false witnesses produced. The Valley was held to ransom for two 
months. Ultimately the CID unravelled the truth. 

 

 

Having tested the waters in 2008 and 2009, the emotive issue of azadi was 
exploited for a mass movement in 2010. The agitation took the “peaceful” form 
of stone-pelting. Sympathy was aroused through portraying “young, innocent” 
boys being brutally killed by the police. Over 2,000 security force personnel 
have been injured due to stone-pelting. This is hardly known, nor is the fact 
that some 1,000 Baluchis have been killed by the Pakistan Army in the last one 
year. 

 

 

Protests were organised against an American pastor’s threat to burn the Quran, 
which did not happen. The Kashmir problem has been communalised in the state, 
and by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference internationally. Hitherto 
Indian Muslims outside Kashmir had kept themselves aloof from the issue. But 
now the Jamiat-Ulema-Hind has announced a convention of 10,000 Muslims of all 
sects at Deoband on October 4 to express solidarity with Kashmiri Muslims. This 
can hold the most dangerous consequences in Muslim majority districts in West 
Bengal, Bihar, Assam and Kerala. 

 

 

Delhi sent a parliamentary delegation to Kashmir after three months. Some 
members called on secessionist leaders who had refused to meet the delegation. 
One of them, a former Cabinet minister who had campaigned in the election with 
an Osama bin Laden lookalike by his side, declared that the ongoing movement in 
Kashmir has no Pakistani connection.

 

 

The Army is being constantly demonised for human rights violations when its 
record is far superior to that of the US Army in Iraq and Afghanistan or the 
Pakistan Army in Baluchistan and Waziristan. Unlike them, we have never used 
airstrikes or artillery against militants in Kashmir. The Army has been prompt 
in action against human rights violators. Over the years, 1,514 cases against 
the Army were reported of which 1,470 were found to be false. Action was taken 
against 70 individuals, dismissing them from service and awarding imprisonment 
from two to 14 years. India has also been humane in dealing with secessionist 
leaders. Mr Syed Ali Shah Geelani, the veteran secessionist leader, suffering 
from cancer, was refused a visa by the US for medical treatment because of his 
terrorist connections. He went to Mumbai where Dr Sameer Kaul, a Kashmiri 
Pandit, operated on him, treating him with competence. On return to Srinagar, 
Mr Geelani said India is in illegal occupation of Kashmir and the international 
community should impose economic sanctions against her. 

 

 

Gen. Musharraf ordered airstrikes in Baluchistan on the hideout of the veteran 
leader Akbar Bugti, who was killed. In Kashmir, instead of tough action, 
periodic troop withdrawals have taken place. Now there is talk of amending or 
scrapping the Armed Forces Special Powers Act. This brings to mind what Winston 
Churchill said: “An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile, hoping that it 
will eat him last.”

 

 

The writ of the state must run in the Valley forthwith and further 
communalisation checked. Without curbing the freedom of the press, we should 
ensure that the media does not act as the mouthpiece of the secessionists. The 
law on sedition must be enforced. Among Kashmiri Muslims, not all are 
secessionists, but those who are need to be politically isolated from the rest. 
A political solution acceptable to all should be evolved through dialogue but 
this must be strictly within the framework of the Indian Constitution.

 
 
- The author, a retired lieutenant-general, was Vice-Chief of Army Staff and 
has served as governor of Assam and Jammu and Kashmir. 
 
 
 .










                                          

Reply via email to