Rahul Gandhi & Terrorism

Tavleen Singh, Indian Express Oped

Posted: Sun Dec 19



You cannot be a political columnist in India today and ignore the man who
could be our prime minister tomorrow if he wants. But, for those of us
obliged to pay careful attention to Rahul Gandhi’s political career, one big
problem is that he seems never to have any views on anything. He spends long
nights in remote villages but returns with no insights on improving rural
living conditions. He befriends farmers’ widows in Vidarbha but has no views
on what can be done to stop farmers’ suicides. He tells the adivasis in
Niyamgiri that he will be their ‘sipahi’ in Delhi but does not tell us if by
this he means he would like them to continue being primitive, marginal
communities. He tells us that he thinks that SIMI (Students Islamic Movement
of India) is just as bad as the RSS but does not explain why. So it makes it
that much more curious that he should have made his first serious policy
statement to the American ambassador.

He was lunching in the American Embassy, we hear from WikiLeaks, and when
the subject of India’s security concerns came up, he said that he believed
‘radicalised Hindu groups’ were more of a threat to India than the
Lashkar-e-Toiba. As someone who has always laughed indulgently at Rahul’s
rural field trips and other foibles, my first reaction was to laugh. And,
then I stopped myself. Rahul’s comment is too serious to laugh at. Not when
we know of the Lashkar-e-Toiba’s role as the organiser of 26/11.

Perhaps, nobody told Rahul Gandhi about the origins of the Lashkar and the
reasons why it is such a powerful terrorist organisation. Perhaps, nobody
told him that it was created by the Pakistani Army and that its founder,
Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, was seen last week in the company of high officials at
some event in Islamabad. Can Rahul name one Hindu radical group that has the
backing of the Indian Army? Can he name one Hindu radical group that has the
protection of the Indian state? So, for the man who could be our future
prime minister, to believe that radical Hindu groups are more of a threat
than the Lashkar-e-Toiba is not just bizarre, but very scary.

There are those who dismissed Rahul’s comments as stupidity but to do this
is to absolve him of responsibility for what he said. Besides, there seems
to be more to what Rahul Gandhi told the American ambassador if you keep in
mind what another Congress general secretary, Digvijay Singh, recently said
about Hemant Karkare’s tragic death. He later clarified that he had not
meant that the terrorist attack on Mumbai was the work of Hindu terrorists but
has not explained why he was releasing a book called, RSS ki saazish—26/11.
This absurdly titled book has been written by a Muslim journalist and if
Digvijay Singh was not sympathetic to the idea mentioned so explicitly in
the title, what was he doing at the book’s release?

When Rahul Gandhi’s comments to the American ambassador became public last
week, he responded by saying that all terrorism and communalism was
dangerous for India. This goes without saying but what does not go without
saying is why senior leaders of the Congress Party are playing such
dangerous games with these two evil cousins. Is it because the drubbing in
Bihar has caused temporary insanity? Is it because Rahul is so unnerved
about reducing (despite his best efforts) the Congress Party’s seats in the
Bihar legislature to four that he is listening to old type advisors? The
kind who believe the only way for the Congress to revive itself in northern
India is by exploiting those ancient divisions of caste and creed?

If this is so, Rahul Gandhi’s future looks very bleak. If there is a lesson
he can learn from Bihar it is that even in our poorest, most backward state,
it is no longer possible to fool voters (either Hindu or Muslim) into being
misled by false divisions of caste and creed. Nitish Kumar won a second term
because people could see the roads, schools and hospitals he built. But, I
digress from the main point of this piece which is to assert as firmly as I
possibly can that national security is sacrosanct.

If at the highest levels of the Congress Party there are people who believe
that the Lashkar-e-Toiba is less dangerous for India than homegrown Hindu
radical groups, then Pakistan has won not just on the terrorist front but on
the propaganda front as well. Let’s stop sending Islamabad those dossiers
and lists of jihadi terrorists. They are meaningless now. Meanwhile, let the
Congress Party try persuading the people of India that Hindu terrorists are
the biggest threat to national security and see how many seats they win in
the next election.

*
*

*
*

*Follow Tavleen Singh on Twitter @ tavleen_singh*




With best wishes

SC Batra

64, A-5/B  SFS
Shanti Kunj,  Paschim Vihar
New Delhi 110063

email.  [email protected]
           [email protected]

Tele +91-9868287443(Mob)
       +91-11-25266739 (Res)



-- 
With best wishes

S Chander

Reply via email to