One can draw a similar pride about Delhi....  May be any part of India.

Read the links in this story.  Interesting reading....

*Still your ‘Marathi Pride’ is not awakened?

*
21 April 2012, Mumbai: Have you recently heard any jokes about selling Taj
Mahal to foreign tourists? No? Not lately? That is because people don’t
joke about that nowadays. Do you want to know why? Because today, the
situation is such that some influential people can truly sell the Taj Mahal
to a foreign tourist. Or, to putting it in the terms that Mumbai public
will relate to, it is not only a possibility but a likelihood that Mumbai’s
beloved Shivaji Maidan will be sold within a few years to a consortium with
some private parties and some foreigners, and the Mantralaya building will
be given as a free gift to the buyer. To avoid causing alarm to the common
man, they will call it ‘Public Private Partnership’ or PPP.

Without a clear-cut PPP policy and without regular audits by Comptroller
and Auditor General (CAG), India’s public property is being carved up and
sold like a beef cow. The government’s butchery and sale of India’s assets
is couched in PPP terminology like modernization of infrastructure, special
purpose vehicles, etc. etc.

A TWISTED LOGIC OPERATES IN PPP PROJECTS: On the one hand, the government
lavishly gives the private partner public resources worth thousands of
crores of rupees, ostensibly because the private partner is supposedly
maintaining a PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE. On the other hand, the private partner
is free to avoid being questioned and to seek undue profits as he argues
(and the government agrees) that this is a PRIVATE ACTIVITY.

HOW CAN BUILDING AND MAINTAINING PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE BE A PRIVATE
ACTIVITY?

HOW CAN ANY SUCH INFORMATION BE ‘PRIVATE’ OR ‘CONFIDENTIAL’? Don’t ask,
because this twisted logic is an accepted part of PPP projects.

“LALOO YADAV RAILWAY STATION IN MUMBAI” -- True or False? False, because it
hasn’t happened yet. But consider this scenario three years hence. The year
is 2015. Patna-based Laloo Yadav & Sons Ltd (LYSL), in collaboration with a
consultant company called *Pirates of Somalia Ltd,* newly registered in
Mauritius, takes over the railway station called Chhatrapati Shivaji
Terminus (CST) in Mumbai. The Railway Ministry transfers CST’s heritage
building and all surrounding railway lands to LYSL on a 30-year lease for
only Rs 100 per year. LYSL in turn transfers this land to a subsidiary
company. This subsidiary company uses it as security to take an
“infrastructure loan” of thousands of crore rupees from a consortium of
public sector banks. Hotels and commercial spaces start sprouting on the
railway land. *Pirates of Somalia Ltd.* periodically sends technical
consultants who freely travel throughout the railway system, and nobody has
the authority to question them – not even the railway ministry.

Worried about national security and public property, citizens file RTI
applications questioning this activity. Laloo Yadav & Sons says, “We are
not part of the government, and so we are not under RTI. We are a private
company, this is a private for-profit activity.” Central Railways and the
Union Railway Ministry don’t answer queries, saying that only Laloo Yadav &
Sons has the answers. Finally, in 2016, Chhatapati Shivaji Terminus is
officially renamed as ‘Laloo Yadav Railway Station’.
Is this a far-fetched scenario?

Now consider another scenario: “GVK REDDY AIRPORT IN MUMBAI” -- True or
false? *True.* It has already happened. Except for the renaming, everything
else mentioned in the previous scenario has already happened to MUMBAI’S
CHHATRAPATI SHIVAJI AIRPORT. *Mumbai’s airport has been the PRIVATE
‘JAAGEER’ OF GVK REDDY OF ANDHRA PRADESH for 4-5 years* now. While the UPA
government seems happy with this situation, the common man is fighting in
court.

Airport Authority of India has 26% stake, and GVK Airport Holdings Pvt Ltd
holds about 51% in a consortium called Mumbai International Airport Limited
(MIAL). The remaining 23% shares are held by two khokha companies
registered in Mauritius, whose relationship with two similar-sounding South
African infrastructure companies is being actively concealed by Govt of
India. In GVK’s annual reports, MIAL is called an “associate company”. The
language of the annual reports indicates that the accounting treatment of
MIAL IS LIKE A GVK GROUP SUBSIDIARY COMPANY rather than as a public sector
entity in which GVK is a private sector partner.

While enjoying 2000 acres of AAI land for a lease rent of Rs 100 per annum,
and paying ridiculously low Income Tax and Service Tax of around Rs 3,000,
GVK claims the freedom to act as if it is just another private limited
company working to maximize profits. It is running MIAL in collaboration
with the two khokha companies – namely ACSA Global Ltd. and Bid Services
(Mauritius) Ltd -- which have shadowy links to the companies that were
evaluated by Airport Authority and found worthy to be partners in the MIAL
Consortium, namely Airports Company South Africa and Bidvest of South
Africa. Details: http://tinyurl.com/MIAL-khokha-cos

The common man who asks questions to MIAL is being stonewalled. See MIAL’s
reply to Sanjay Shirodkar’s RTI application:
http://tinyurl.com/Shirodkar-RTI-MIAL-reply

In June 2008, a BOMBAY HIGH COURT RULED THAT MIAL IS AN INSTRUMENTALITY OF
THE ‘STATE’. BUT GVK STILL REFUSES TO ADOPT STANDARDS OF TRANSPARENT
DEALING that come with being an instrumentality of state, and a custodian
of state properties. What is alarming is that Govt of India is quietly
playing along with GVK.

To shield GVK and the khokha companies, even public authorities such as
Airport Authority of India (AAI), Union Aviation Ministry, Finance
Ministry, Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA), Planning
Commission and other government bodies that are privy to MIAL’s dealings
are continually evading RTI queries. No government agency wants to disclose
anything. See Sanjay Shirodkar's many RTI Applications and the evasive
replies received: http://tinyurl.com/Shirodkar-RTIs-about-MIAL
A consortium of banks gave an infrastructure loan of Rs 4200 crore of
public money to MIAL. Whose money? Yours and mine. But the details are
being concealed by the banks. In a worryingly perverse order, Central
Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi opined that it was a matter of
“commercial confidence and fiduciary relationship” between the banks and
the borrower, and there was no public interest in our knowing about it:
http://tinyurl.com/ShaileshGandhi-MIAL-Order-2012

MIAL is part of a dangerous trend of private parties snapping up public
resources and taxpayer’s money. We the People need to recognize the
seriousness of this problem, and counter it before it is too late.
*
HOW GVK IS ABUSING THE JUDICIAL PROCESS TO CAUSE DELAYS*

The question of whether MIAL is a public authority (i.e. answerable under
RTI Act 2005) was decided by Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.617 Of
2007. The judgment dated 5th June 2008 said, “the issues which arise for
consideration in the present Writ Petition are: (i) Whether the Respondent
No 3 Company, MIAL, is ‘State’ within the meaning of Article 12?” On page
170 and 171 of the judgment, after lengthy reasoning, Bombay High Court
concluded, “It is because Respondent No.3 performs Governmental functions
that… it can just like Government use a summary procedure to evict
unauthorized occupants on the area leased to it without following the rigor
of the Rent Act. This shows unmistakably that Respondent No. 3 is “State”
for the purpose of Article 12.” Read highlighted portions of Bombay High
Court judgment dated 5th June 2008:
http://tinyurl.com/BombayHC-MIAL-Flemingo-order

The question of whether MIAL was a public authority as per RTI (which is
the same as being “State” under Article 12 of the Constitution) was
simultaneously considered and answered by the Central Information
Commission in June 2008. The CIC ruled that MIAL, like its counterpart DIAL
(Delhi International Airport Ltd) is a public authority, and therefore
directed it to furnish the information requested under RTI. But MIAL did
not want to comply. As this matter had already been decided by Bombay High
Court, MIAL DID NOT HAVE THE OPTION TO APPEAL BEFORE BOMBAY HIGH COURT. SO
IT WENT TO DELHI HIGH COURT and pleaded that its submissions had not been
heard by CIC. (This unlawful behavior is called forum-shopping -- actively
seeking a court that might give a favorable judgment.)

Delhi High Court asked CIC to re-hear the case.  CIC RE-HEARD THE CASE.
IT’S VERDICT WAS THAT MIAL IS DEFINITELY A PUBLIC AUTHORITY as per section
2(h), and therefore, it must give information requested under RTI. CIC
order dated 30th May 2011: http://tinyurl.com/CIC-MIAL-Order-2011

STILL DETERMINED TO NOT PROVIDE INFORMATION, MIAL FILED YET ANOTHER FRESH
WRIT PETITION BEFORE DELHI HIGH COURT! To avoid being held accountable as a
‘State’ as per the Bombay High Court judgment, MIAL is now dragging on this
case in the Supreme Court: http://tinyurl.com/SupremeCourt-MIAL-Flemingo

In this way, MIAL – or rather GVK Group -- has built up a cancerous mass of
15 litigations before the Supreme Court alone, to cause confusion and
maintain the status quo: http://tinyurl.com/SupremeCourt-MIAL-15
*
WHY ARE OPPOSITION PARTIES SILENT? *

The Congress-led government is doing its best to cover up the loot. But We
ask the self-appointed guardians of Marathi pride – namely, Shiv Sena and
Maharashtra Navnirman Sena -- why they are letting the government get away
with it? Are the Sena-led trade unions at the airport not keeping them
informed about the daylight robbery of Mumbai’s most prestigious
international asset by these thugs from Andhra Pradesh, South Africa and
God-knows-where-else? Is the pride of the ‘Marathi manoos’ not injured by
this motley bunch looting Chhatrapati Shivaji Airport where a giant statue
of the great Maratha warrior was proposed to be installed?

MARATHI PRIDE? WHAT MARATHI PRIDE? The silence of two Senas makes us
question whether the Marathi asmita is only a ornamental showpiece, like
the manly turbans that are worn only for watching Lavani dancers perform,
and not for any real act of manliness and courage.





-- 
With best wishes

S Chander

Reply via email to