*You Shuffle, I’ll Deal***
  *[DAWN, 1 Nov. 2012] *

 Certain anniversaries subside without a trace. The events of October
12th1999, thirteen years ago, were one such non-occurrence. It was the
day, it
should be recalled, that the Prime Minister of our country hijacked the
Chief of the Army Staff of our Army.

 The flight itself was routine. PIA’s commercial flight PK 805 carrying
about 200 passengers originating from Colombo neared its destination
Karachi. Orders were issued to the pilot from the Prime Minister Nawaz
Sharif in Islamabad to the Director General Civil Aviation Aminullah
Chaudry at Karachi to prevent it from landing at Karachi’s Jinnah
International Airport.  The pilot of the plane was told that he could not
land at either Karachi or at its standby alternative Nawabshah.  He was
free to proceed to Muscat or Abu Dhabi, or Mumbai or Ahmedabad. The
unwelcome passenger on board that aircraft was General Pervez Musharraf.

 Eventually the trucks blocking the runway at Karachi airport were removed
and the plane was allowed to land with seven minutes of fuel to spare.

 Years after the event, each of them published his own Rashomon version of
that eventful day. General Musharraf’s recollections appeared in his memoir
*In the Line of Fire* (2006). Nawaz Sharif’s recalled his in a series of
interviews given to a journalist and published under the title *The Traitor
Within: The Nawaz Sharif in his own words* (2008); Aminullah Chaudry’s
account *Musharraf, Nawaz and Hijacking from the Ground: The bizarre story
of PK 805* appeared in 2010. Truth was made to pass through the prism of
their eyes.

 Aminullah Chaudry’s explanation repeated a line heard all too often at the
Nuremberg trials. He was simply obeying orders. He was ‘duty bound to carry
out the orders of the elected Chief Executive of Pakistan, if the rules so
permitted, and as long as no threat was posed to human life or property.’

 For Nawaz Sharif, removal General Musharraf of the Chief of Army Staff
whom he had appointed also Chairman Joints Chiefs of Staff was his
constitutional prerogative. ‘When the value of constitutional posts is
reduced,’ he explained, ‘it is inevitable either to quit or to take the
risk.’  He took the risk, as US President Truman did in 1951 when he
removed his army chief General Macarthur.  Nawaz Sharif however gambled and
lost.  Unlike the US army, the Pakistan Army moved swiftly to protect its
Chief, and removed the prime minister.

 In any other country, it would have been considered a military coup.
Musharraf’s Prussian-style justification contended that it was in fact a
civilian coup by Nawaz Sharif against the army. The army had simply mounted
a counter-coup in defence of its Chief. ‘I did not take over,’ Musharraf
claimed later. ‘I was handed over the government.’ He made it sound like a
duty-free give-away. He grabbed it. Which self-respecting PIA passenger
wouldn’t?

 By 2007, after eight years in power, Musharraf’s control was no longer
tenable; the return of democracy and of Benazir Bhutto no longer avoidable.
Today, the beneficiaries of the deal struck between Benazir Bhutto and
Musharraf are claimants to the very presidency which Musharraf sacrificed
his ‘second skin’ – his military uniform – to retain.

 Asif Ali Zardari is now the President and is prepared to sacrifice
everyone else’s skin to remain so. Nawaz Sharif is a president-in waiting
in Lahore, and Musharraf is a president-in waiting in London.  Will that
configuration stand altered after the next general elections, whenever they
might be called?

 It seems unlikely. The advantage President Zardari enjoys is that of an
incumbent. He is already at the crease. His opponents are still in the
nets. He can decide when, if at all, he wishes to give the other side a
chance to bat. For the time being, understandably, he does not wish to be
hurried into declaring.

 Prime Minister Manmohan Singh must be viewing Zardari’s position with a
tinge of envy.  He has reshuffled his Cabinet ‘for the last time’ before
the next Indian election, all too conscious that he is now a lame duck
octogenarian Prime Minister. He has decided to pass the torch to a new
generation of Indian politicians, the most significant of whom for Pakistan
must be Mr Salman Khurshid, who takes over as Foreign Minister from the
octogenarian S.M. Krishna.

 Mr Khurshid’s credentials are impeccable. Academically, he is a graduate
of St Stephen’s College, Delhi, and then Oxford University. Genetically, he
is the grandson of Dr Zakir Hussain, India’s first Muslim President.
Politically, he began his career with Mrs Indira Gandhi and has remained a
Congress Party loyalist ever since. Religiously, he is the first Indian
Muslim to occupy a post that will place him inevitably and insidiously
under the microscope of public scrutiny. If he is too conciliatory towards
Pakistan, he will be criticised for being too soft on terrorism. Too tough,
and he will be accused of being more patriotic than he need be.

 Perhaps the best guide the new Foreign Minister can have is the
performance of a previous Indian Foreign Secretary, his fellow Muslim
Salman Haider.  Mr Haider spent just over two years between March 1995 and
June 1997 in the post, under three Foreign Ministers. He maintained such a
fine balance of credibility that whatever he achieved as Foreign Secretary
has been cemented by his role in the Twin-track dialogue that runs
unobtrusively like some underground confluence between the Ganges and
Indus, irrigating fresh ideas.

 Meanwhile, interestingly, two absentee heirs – Rahul Gandhi and Bilawal
Bhutto – wait for their political harvest to ripen.

 F.S. AIJAZUDDIN





-- 
With best wishes

S Chander

Reply via email to