Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 15:40:51 +0800
Subject: 10 SHADES OF INDIAN SECULARISM !
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
----------
It may be politically not correct to say
so but what the text says is not
factually wrong. The overdose of 'secularism' is bound to have a backlash
YOU BE THE JUDGE
10 SHADES OF INDIAN SECULARISM
1 ) In
India, with 80% Hindu population, and the only homeland of Hindus in the
world, the birthdays of great sons of the soil, Shri Ram and Shri Krishna, are
not compulsory central government holidays, while the birthday of Saudi Arabia
born So called Prophet -Mohammad
and both the birth and crucification day of Bethlehem born Jesus, are
compulsory holidays throughout India. This seems in sync with the secular
hypothesis that Ram and
Krishna are imaginary comic characters while Mohammad and Jesus are actual
historical characters. There are only 2 Hindu holidays out of compulsory 14, in
contrast with 4 Muslim ones.****
****
2) The Constitution of India enables the government to take control of Hindu
temples and trusts and appoint its nominees in their controlling body and even
control its funds. The
government doesn't have this privilege for the mosques or churches. The
government cannot interfere in the functioning of the mosques, madarsas and any
minority institutions even if they receive government aid, which is taxpayers'
money. The minority institutions
are not bound to comply with the Right to Education act either. This can be
seen as a lighter version of Pakistan and
Bangladesh's enemy property laws which enable their governments to confiscate
the propeties of Hindus by declaring them enemy properties.
****
3) Everyone knows that
India doesn't have uniform civil code. Indian muslim males are legally allowed
to have up to 4 wives at a time, and can divorce them by saying 'Talaaq'
thrice, in compliance with Sharia. Hindus and Christians have to follow proper
court procedures to file for divorce. The women right activists who organise
'slut-walks' to celebrate their 'rights' and advocate girls visiting pubs, do
not speak on this matter. Shah Bano case stands as a glaring example of how
secularism is a constitutionally prescribed
drug meant only for Hindus, not for minorities.
****
4) Prayagraj, one of the holiest pilgrimages of Hindus, is called Allah-abad.
Kashi, Ayodhya and
Mathura, each of these 3 holy sites has been desecrated and yet not fully
restored. The signboards of Auragzeb road in
Delhi stand as the testimony to India's slavery that Indian secularism
celebrates so profusely. In 2007, over 1 lakh Indian muslims paid homage to
Aurangzeb's tomb on his 300th anniversary, that's when Aurangzeb is
known to be the perpetrator of the largest Hindu genocide ever. Aurangzeb had
even got Guru Teg Bahadur beheaded in his court for his refusal to convert to
Islam.
****
5) An instance of Indian secularism is the 1978 directive to NCERT which
instructs it to erase all medieval history which paints a picture of clash
between native Hindus and invading muslims
in that era. Consequently, we have a chapter each from Akbar to Aurangzeb, but
Shivaji and Maharana Pratap are squeezed into a paragraph each in history
books. Despite all the evidence to the contrary, discredited Aryan Invasion
Theory is still taught in Indian
schools. The history books do not cover the Mahabharata despite a plethora of
archaeological evidence available to conclusively establish its historicity.****
****
6) The Archealogical Survey of
India in its annual report of 1924-25 published a long list of Hindu temples
demolished during Islamic rule. Sita Ram Goel, Arun Shourie and others have
published a book after conducting research and they've given a 64 page long
district-wise
list of Islamic monuments which were constructed by demolishing Hindu temples.
This list, in the book, "Hindu temples - what happened to them", includes
around 2000+ temples and gives in most cases,
the year of construction of those structures also. Even in Kashmir, hundreds of
temples, small and large have been desecrated over during the exodus of Hindus
in early 90s. The same, however, is a non-issue in larger secular polity. It's
continued
unabted in whichever time orspace, Hindus have become weak.****
****
7) From Ram Mandir to Ram Setu and to Bhagwad Geeta, all have been dragged into
Indian courts.
India is the only country in the world where the faith of 100 Crore people is
humiliated. It'd be silly to look for parallels where in a Muslim majority
country, Quran or the prophet, or in a Christian majority country, Bible or
Christ, could be dragged into a court of law. In India, the central government
filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court suggesting that Ram never existed. In
the same country, Christian missionaries openly preach about Hindus' false
and 'characterless' gods, and so do Islamic missionaries like Zakir Naik, but
the tag of 'hate-monger' has been attributed to Hindu right wing by secular
luminaries in media and otherwise.****
****
8) There are numerous government schemes which are run exclusively for the
benefit of minorities at the expense of taxpayer money, despite an apparent
prohibition to the same in the constitution. Pashchim Banga
government paying monthly stipend to all the Imams of all the mosques in the
state is a glaring example of this. The same is not extended to Hindu pujaris.
The Haj subsidy, against which the Supreme Court finally ordered, which had
been running since Independence
even when no other country, not even Pakistan offers it, is another
example.****
****
9) The practice of Saraswati Vandana has been discontinued from almost all
government events with the rise of secular fanaticism.
The TV series Chanakya of 90's was asked to remove Saffron flags from it, its
being indispensable to the picturaization of Chanakya's Akhand Bharat
notwithstanding. Doordarshan's 'Satyam Shivam Sundaram' had also been removed
before being brought back. Off
late, even the practice of lighting a lamp has been criticised as 'unislamic'.
A litigation was filed in
Gujarat high court for inaugurating a room by breaking a coconut for its being
a Hindu (not Secular). A case was lodged in Chennai High Court to prohibit the
employees celebrating festivals in office space. The beast of secular
fanaticism has
gone wilder over the years
Sv
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
