[image: mediator_guru]

The creation of a discourse on "Hindu Terror" was a covert operations ploy
by USA's Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Pakistan's Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI).

It was designed for a two-fold purpose – to create a façade of confusion
about the real terrorist perpetrators of 26/11 by creating a fog of "Hindu
Terror". The second purpose is an outcome of the first – break the Indian
national spirit and depress the Hindu community in India, seed a violent
communal civil strife and deeply polarize India.


However, this game of fomenting the concept of "Hindu Terror" in order to
keep the majority community divided could not have been played without the
collaboration of some anti-national Indian stakeholders in the political,
government and institutional set-ups. In this high stakes intelligence game
an innocent Indian army officer – Lt Col Srikant Purohit – was made the
fall guy.

This article is a revelation of how Lt Col Purohit became a pawn in the
hands of Indian collaborators based on official documents that are
contained in the confidential files of the Government of India (GoI).
Intelligence records available with the GoI reveal that Lt Col Purohit was
consistently sending ground reports from Maharashtra on an array of fringe
groups, some of whom were sourcing training on a range of militant
activities. These confidential documents available with the GoI show that
Lt Col Purohit was diligently doing his job as an intelligence officer.

His accurate warnings and intelligence report had already alerted and
warned the GoI of trouble brewing in Malegaon. It is important to remember
that separately and co-terminus with this timeline, another plan was
brewing in Karachi and elsewhere in Pakistan for a terrorist attack on
Mumbai. To understand how Lt Col Purohit became a pawn in the hands of
those in India, Pakistan and the US to create a narrative of Hindu Terror.

To understand the trajectory of terror from Malegaon to Mumbai 26/11, it is
important to keep the following triangular reference frame in mind:

A simple internet search on links between the CIA and ISI throws up more
than a million results in less than a second. Let us accept the evidence
submitted and accepted in the US Court trial of David Headley and the
admissions made by the US Government agencies during the course of this
trial.

On January 24, 2013 a federal judge in the US sentenced American David
Coleman Headley's to 35 years in prison for his role in organizing scouting
missions for the 2008 terrorist attack on Mumbai that killed 160 people.

During the trial Headley revealed to the Court that the ISI helped
Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) execute 26/11 attacks, Further, lawyers during the
trial firmly established that Headley was a double agent working for the
CIA and ISI.

So after years of accumulated evidence, finally, it was a terror related
trial in a US Federal Court which established a fact that was already well
known to Indian intelligence agencies – That the CIA and the ISI were
involved in major covert operations in India.

It is important to remember that in the immediate aftermath of 26/11
initial reports from India suggested that some outfit named "Deccan
Mujahideen" had claimed responsibility.

However, very quickly this decoy was demolished thanks to the capture of
Ajmal Kasab by the brave Mumbai police constable, Tukaram Ombale, and other
evidence such as phone intercepts, recovery of weapons and other items
including the seizure the boat and dinghy used to by the terrorists to
reach the Mumbai coastline.

Imagine if Ajmal Kasab hadn't been captured alive! One cannot rule out the
possibility of the discourse of 26/11 shifting entirely to "Hindu Terror".
Vigorous attempts were anyway made to portray the Mumbai Terror attacks as
such.

If these are the two base points of triangular reference frame to
understand terrorism in India in the post 9/11 world, the third of this
triangle dwarfs all others in its strategic significance. The third point
of this isosceles triangle was an ISI covert operation, which was aimed at
breaking the spirit of the people of India with the help of Indian
collaborators. Its objective was to erase and eliminate the discourse on
Islamist and Jehadi terror and replace that discourse with a narrative of
"Hindu Terror".

The strategic design was to create a new terror calculus to change the
discourse on terrorism in India and by doing so make the majority Hindu
community feel humiliated and lose self-respect. This would have
facilitated the creation of an unquestioned space for the insertion of a
countervailing narrative to cover up all Islamist Jehadi terror attacks as
"Hindu terror".

The circumcenter of this Isosceles of Terror was intended to neutralize and
de-legitimize Pakistan's role as a State Sponsor of Terrorism in India.
Therefore, it is imperative to focus on the prevailing terrorism related
discourse in India from 2000 till date.

Some of those terrorist attacks which led to the framing of a particular
narrative – that of "home grown terror" and "Hindu terror" – are mentioned
briefly below:

*2003 – Most terrorist attacks, some four of them, were in and around
Mumbai. It would be pertinent to recall that the present genre of terrorist
discourse orchestrated by Pakistan began with the 1993 bombings of Mumbai.

*2005 – There were two attacks at Jaunpur in UP and Delhi. Pakistan
sponsored terror thus made its eastward journey.

*2006 – Terrorism having spread its tentacles in the national capital and
in the east, was in a position to simultaneously target both Varanasi and
Mumbai. Amongst the three attacks that year, the one at Malegaon in
September has generated lot of controversy. At that time there was no hint
or mention of the phenomenon called 'Hindu Terror'.
The ATS had picked up operatives of SIMI and the DGP of Maharashtra vouched
for their involvement in blasts in a press conference (unabashedly
rescinded by his successors some years later to keep in sync with political
imperatives of 'Hindu Terror).' This was a period when Pakistan sponsored
terrorism was seeking newer areas and newer avenues.

*2007 – This was the year that jihadi terrorism made its footprints in
southern part of India. There were two blasts in Hyderabad within a span of
three months. It also made inroads into Rajasthan by way of blasts in Ajmer
in the month of October. Delhi as discussed earlier had already been
targeted in 2005 and terror made its journey northwards. In February, the
Samjhauta Express was targeted near Panipat (Haryana). Terror subsequently
moved further north and in October there were blasts in a movie theatre in
Ludhiana.

*2008 – The growing tentacles of jihadi terror in west, centre, north, east
and south manifested themselves in this year. The terrorists that year had
a crowded schedule, i.e. January – Rampur (east); May – Jaipur, July –
Bangalore, Ahmedabad, September – Delhi, Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Mumbai
26/11.

The trajectory, design and pattern of growth is evident for any analyst who
retains his objectivity. India by end of 2008 was geographically
circumscribed by Pakistan sponsored jihadi terror. Mumbai followed by Delhi
were the worst victims. Maharashtra had become the most radicalized and
communally sensitive state of India. It may be recalled that in these
years, there was one particular party ruling the state. In 1993 as well,
when India experienced the first wave of jihadi terror, it was the same
party that was at the helm.

In the reckoning of this political party, Pakistan sponsored terrorism and
its resultant radicalization in India was undermining its very existence.
Something had to be desperately invented to counter this terror narrative.
Therefore, so-called 'Hindu Terror' had to be invented. It is not mere
coincidence that even when the phenomenon of Hindu Terror had been
invented, a prime ministerial aspirant, as per WikiLeaks, told the American
Ambassador that he was more concerned about 'Hindu Terror' rather than
'jihadi terror'.

An English television channel and an English newspaper were also recruited
for the purpose. The said channel ran a totally effete, rather motivated
story on Hindu groups targeting the Vice-President. Nobody has taken the
channel to Court nor have the so-called conspirators so far been
prosecuted, and the said newspaper known to entirely survive on yellow
journalism, have not been taken to task.

India's most incisive, irreproachable and dedicated analyst late B Raman,
former Additional Secretary R&AW, questioned the very basis of 'Hindu
Terror' and declared it 'motivated'. The anti-nationals in the country
lampooned him. His stand was ascribed to his desire to acquire a sinecure
from a possible new government. It was only when the attacks got vicious
that Raman with great anguish had to say that the only sinecure left for
him was in the kingdom of God as he was in the terminal stages of cancer.

In all these years Mumbai and Maharashtra had been nurtured as nursery of
terror through incessant dose of terrorism and jihadi terror discourse. The
ISI and the Dawood gang had colluded towards this. By the year 2008, jihadi
terror had consumed the entire country and Maharashtra had emerged as the
meeting point of jihadi terror and politics. Politicians in Maharashtra
began to dabble into the terror discourse for monetary inducements and
vote-bank politics.

It is in this backdrop that Lt Col Purohit operated as an intelligence
officer in Devlali, Nasik. The unremitting terrorist attacks all over the
country had outraged the country. Indians were confounded regards the
motive of such attacks by the ISI through its agents in India. The
religious factor was overwhelming. Polarization of Indians along religious
lines was ineluctable outcome. This polarization was like the death-knell
for some political parties. Unable to bridle Pakistan based jihadi
organisations, they looked for the simplest solution, i.e. inventing Hindu
Terror.

The government in Maharashtra where Chief Ministers were removed and
installed from Delhi at whim came in handy to prepare the ground for Hindu
Terror.
Lt Col Purohit like a competent intelligence officer infiltrated all
religious organizations (Hindu and Muslims) overt and covert. Feeding him
inside information on the activities of these organizations was one
Sudhakar Chaturvedi.

This author has proof to substantiate that Lt Col Purohit reported about
all organizations to his higher headquarters. He was later castigated for
his alleged association with Abhinav Bharat. He had reported about its
activities and sent a copy of the entire literature of the organization of
which there was nothing covert. These are all on record.
Now, only a sinister or obtuse mind can accuse an Intelligence Officer of
linkages with an organization about which he is reporting. Lt Col Purohit
had also successfully infiltrated SIMI. In his letter to the Prime Minister
dated 31 May 2014, he writes: "Sir, that the same ATS (which arrested him)
and Maharashtra Police had invited me to impart training to them on
subjects of SIMI and ISI, and letters to that effect were addressed to me
and to my higher headquarters."

Lt Col Purohit moved to Army Education Corps School, Panchmarhi for a three
years Arabic language course in 2007. The following year, 2008 witnessed
the highest number of terrorist attacks all over the country. Nearly a
dozen attacks before 26/11 had sent jitters in a particular political
segment. For the sake of very survival of this segment, it had to do
something immediately to counter jihadi terror. Politics subverted
country's security. There was a dying desperation to create 'Hindu Terror'.
26/11 was planned as a ghastly plot of that terror.

Even before 26/11, there were sinister attempts on part of the ISI and
their political collaborators in India to raise organizations with Hindu
names, but for the purpose of jihadi terror. The objective of these
organizations was to drive wedge in the majority community and wean away
segments for partnership with jihadi terror. This tactic has also been
adopted by the Popular Front of India (PFI) entrenched in Kerala and some
other parts in South.

Lt Col Purohit and his intelligence detachment had reported about such
organizations in detail to the higher-ups. This was at a time when the
specter of Hindu terror was not even germinate amongst Indians. Now sample
the reports on these organizations.

*Shiv Dharma: In 12 Jan 2005, Mr. —— (Hindu name) came up with a brilliant
idea by launching the "Shiv Dharma". This organization was established at a
village Sindhked-Raja in Buldhana district. The aim of this religion is no
caste/religion only a Shiva Dharma. The new religion is polished form of
Islam wherein the Hindu Maratha ladies are not allowed to wear the "Mangala
Sutra", the Sindhur on forehead and the hair partition. It is noticed that
the organization is opposite of Brahmins caste, the organization published
various types of literature time to time and distribute in locales. It
further denounces the idol worshiping and propagates destruction of Hindu
idols. On this very day a Military wing of the organization was launched by
this religion is called 'Sambhaji Brigade'. In 12 Jan 2005, the religion
also launched a ladies wing called 'Jijau Brigade', the aim of the brigade
is to safeguard the action of the mother organization. The brigades are
used as a fighting force of organization. The cadre of the brigade is
majority of Muslims and Neo Buddhist (Backward class).

*Maratha Seva Sangh: Was raised by Mr. — (Hindu name) by splitting from
"Maratha Maha Sangh" in year 1991. The organization was formed to safeguard
to Maratha Muslims and OBC, BC, ST and other caste in Maharashtra. The aim
of the organization to upgrade low level caste, the organization allowed
membership to all caste except Brahmins in Maharashtra.

*Sambhaji Brigade: Is supposedly having very strong link with SIMI. One Mr
—- (Hindu name), a senior leader of this organization has come out openly
with a statement saying that the funding is done by SIMI.

*Political Angle: This unification of Neo Buddhists, backward Christians
and Muslims has gained some political importance too. On 8 February 2006, a
closed door meeting was organized at Pune which was attended by (name being
withheld, the individual is an old regional satrap). It was decided that
the three castes of Maharashtra i.e. Maratha, Mahar and Muslims in the
state so as to have a strong political front. The 'regional satrap' (as
mentioned) has a motive to join the alliance of (another regional satrap of
UP)"

>From the above, it can be clearly inferred that there was a diabolical plan
to carryout jihadi terrorist activities within India through terrorist
organizations ostensibly with Hindu labels. Karkare was very much aware
about these organisations. The ATS that he headed was very much in the loop.

Nevertheless, this plan reached its acme and manifested in 26/11. The dozen
terror attacks in 2008 had jolted the edifice of some political parties.
26/11 was an act of desperation to create 'Hindu Terror'. The collusive ISI
network within India was activated. Mumbai was attacked. More than 160
people lost their lives. India was shaken. For Indians it was not mere
terrorism but attack by Pakistan. They were bewildered that why the
perpetrators and the participants had taken such great care to portray the
attack as 'Hindu Terror'.

The participants were taught Hindi painstakingly and sported the sacred
thread like many Hindus on their wrists. Ajmal Kasab was caught, but for
whom the perpetrators and the colluders had nearly succeeded in their
diabolical plan of fabricating 26/11 as an act of 'Hindu Terrorists'.

This plan suffered from major drawback with regard to the 'credulity
factor'. To create the necessary credible environment for Indians to accept
the phenomenon of 'Hindu Terror' something had to be done. Just two months
away from 26/11 the Malegaon blasts of September 2008, carried out under
the nose of and with the full knowledge of some higher ups in the then
Government of India, was part of that preparation.

A lady in saffron and an Indian Army Officer were picked up for their
involvement in the blast. This was done deliberately to create very
powerful symbols to neutralize the visualization of jihadi terror for
public consumption and sell 'Hindu Terror' to unsuspecting Indians!

It did not matter that Purohit was away from Devlali and Maharashtra for
more than a year. The others who were picked up along with Lt Col Purohit
were his 'sources'. In intelligence parlance and practice, sources are
cultivated to provide information which are processed into intelligence.
For any intelligence professional, the identities of these sources are
sacred and are protected all through, even after retirement.

The Maharashtra ATS and some subverted elements within the Indian Army sold
their conscience to their political masters and apprehended the same
sources that were providing the critical information to the Military
Intelligence detachment at Devlali. These registered sources were utilized
effectively by even the successor of Lt Col Purohit between 2007 and 2008.
One such source was Sudhakar Chaturvedi.

Lt Col Purohit in his letter to the Prime Minister writes: "two days before
my official arrest and 17 days before the arrest of Chaturvedi, both Maj.
and Subedar Pawar had caught one ATS Assistant Police Inspector namely
Shekhar Bagade planting evidences at Chaturdevi's house. He was caught
red-handed by these two witnesses and on getting caught the unscrupulous
officer even pleaded with folded hands not to report his presence at
Chaturvedi's house to anyone, as it would create lot of problems. API
Bagade's presence and planting of evidence at Chaturvedi's house on
November 03, 2008 was reported by Maj. to all his seniors in Devlali and
also to Headquarters Southern Command Pune."

The above submission by Lt Col Purohit is a statement of fact supported by
various documents. Moreover and importantly it is also a question whether
dedicated and upright Indian army personnel who were consistently sending
intelligence reports from the ground should be believed or the crooks who
fabricated 'Hindu Terror.'

Till today, even after six years, there is no charge-sheet against Lt Col
Purohit. It may never be so because untruth after all has a lifespan and
lies have limited shelf life.

How destiny will deal with Lt Col Purohit is another matter, but those who
were part of the conspiracy to fabricate 'Hindu Terror' must now be
investigated. The network runs into the Indian Army as well. The kingpin
appears to be another Colonel, who dubiously handed over Lt Col Purohit to
Maharashtra ATS. This author has learnt from many sources about the brazen
boast of this Colonel of manhandling another colleague Purohit 'till his
own hands were swollen'.

It is also learnt that the ATS, to begin with was very courteous in dealing
with Purohit, but subsequently prodded by the Colonel they too meted
barbaric treatment. All this was happening with the cultivated indifference
of an Army Chief, who had no qualms in sacrificing Purohit for ingratiating
himself to the anti-national dispensation.

The network of 'Hindu Terror' industry theory also comprised a politician
and a former editor of Urdu newspaper. This editor despite the set-back
caused by Kasab persisted with his book, "26/11: RSS ki Sajish" and the
said politician went all the way to Mumbai to release it. The same
politician who bragged about unauthorized and illegal disclosures made to
him by Karkare on matters of Hindu terror.

All these claims were made by this politician after Karkare's martyrdom.
Clearly, apart from the terrorists, for many others, a living Karkare was
suicidal. It did not matter to the plotters that Ajmal Kasab had spoilt
their script. Another former police officer persisted with his book "Who
killed Karkare?"

The connection between ISI, political collaborators within India and LeT
was quite evident when a Cabinet Minister alleged the existence of Hindu
Terrorism only to rescind later. But by then it had served Pakistan's
agenda. Hafiz Sayed congratulated the said minister for admitting the
existence of Hindu terrorism. Hafiz Sayed went to the extent of demanding
drone attacks on the hindu terror camps in India.

Now that the script has been unraveled, will this grateful nation honour
its patriot Lt Col Purohit by honourably releasing him and restoring his
dignity? His lost years can only be compensated by bringing the
perpetrators of 26/11 and the fabricators of 'Hindu Terror' to gallows. The
GoI must reveal all the intelligence reports dispatched by Lt Col Purohit
in the Court of law where he is being tried. Questions must be asked in the
Court on how an army officer who did his job well and was consistently
sending accurate intelligence report got framed under a terror charge.

If there is evidence against Lt Col Purohit then charges must be pressed
against him. Or else he must be acquitted immediately with his full honour
restored. Similarly, the intelligence reports sent by him to the higher ups
in the GoI should also be made public in the national interest so that
India's highly respected and independent judiciary and the public at large
is made aware of this conspiracy.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to