I will not watch his channel myself ... but .. in the case of Arnab Goswami, Judge Chandrasooty! By Shyamsundar I | Updated: Wednesday, November 11, 2020, 21:09 [IST] New Delhi: Supreme Court Judge Chandrasooty has slammed the Maharashtra government in the case of Republic TV editor Arnab Goswami. Republic TV editor Arnab Goswami has been arrested in connection with the suicide of Maharashtra-based architect Anve Naik. The police investigation, which was completed in 2019, has been re-investigated and Arnab Goswami has been arrested. Advertisement Powered By PLAYSTREAM Arnab Goswami has been denied bail in this case. The apex court today heard the appeal filed by Arnab Goswami against the Mumbai High Court verdict in this regard. Nitish wave breaks in Bihar .. Cong. Supreme Court Justices Chandrasooty and Indira Banerjee heard the case of Arnab Goswami. Speaking on the occasion, Chandrasooty refused to grant bail to Arnab in the case. Nor can it be accepted that Arnab was taken into custody and interrogated. You may not like his policy. I myself will not watch his channel. But justice cannot be denied for that. Chandrasooty Anger If state governments act like this against the law .. the Supreme Court will immediately intervene and stop it. The state high court must also act decisively in this. They must also be determined to uphold the law. Why were they refused bail? Cases like this are becoming more frequent nowadays. The high courts have not done their duty .. People even go to jail for putting up a single tweet. This is very wrong. Democratic strength Our democracy is very strong. Arrests should not be made for petty matters. For all intents and purposes the government should not be taking the arrest action by the hand. Not all of these channels have a big impact on election results. Why arrest when that is the case ?. Don't get arrested for everything you don't like about the channel. If you don't like a channel, don't watch it. Why leave it and take action on the presenter? This is not a case of terrorism at all. The right of the petitioner in this should not be denied. FIR The FIR has not yet been fully filed in this case. Why hurry into it. The court is now compelled to act decisively on this. We are compelled to intervene in the affairs of the state and make a decision, said Judge Chandrasooty.
Read more at: https://tamil.oneindia.com/news/delhi/i-don-t-watch-his-channel-but-says-sc-on-arnab-goswami-bail-hearing/articlecontent-pf499827- 402855.html On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 16:09, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]> wrote: > sir > SC observations are (Justice Chandrachud) exposing the state and the > police; article 32 in vogus the state does not know?; while CJM has > observed the arrest illegal not invoking sec 306, how come the HC took a > tangential observation. Justice Banerjee being consulted; when there are > many opinions bail can be denied?. Wait and see K R IRS > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZop%2BAQjBoEJgQ7qaey-mFssVVCBz1%3DwcDLS4vX%2B3mayohA%40mail.gmail.com.
