Very interesting! Pranam. there is a term AGREE TO DISAGREE. 11 JUDGES ON A BENCH. THERE IS A FIRE ON THE TOP OF THE HILL. Smoke is out. It is not snowing. all the 11 judges decide that there is a fire (this is an example set by Adi Sankara and 99.99% I only quote rightly since I am ashamed of my knowledge lest it shall be accepted). Now physics says that as true in nature, as the cause of agni and effect of agni. There is a consensus. What is the error there could be?. When the consensus is reached on external analysis or loud thinking, in the best interests of the public, without any self motivation, (judicially meaning is that ) there it is perfect. However, when the 6 did that and the rest 5 who had the vested interests to concur and selfish motive outside the law with the ambiguity, or was lazy to act or was not interested but had to serve for the sake-there could be left outs. That consensus is suspicious. Then it is politicas. Not the judiciary. Today I mainly practiced. If religion can be chosen by the individuals unmindful of the trade but conveniently flagged with the provisions, then why should an individualistic attitude as a choice , differing in aspects, be in the constitution at all?. Why should it be in the national survey? Why shall it be a fill up in all applications?. Why would it call for the control of the Govt at all. Why shall there be majority and minority in law?. Ways of the minds are stranger than the fickle minds of the ladies. K R IRS 10421
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 at 08:39, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]> wrote: > The Paradox of Consensus: Under ancient Jewish law, if a suspect was found > guilty by every judge, they were deemed innocent. Too much agreement > implied a systemic error in the judicial process. Beware: unanimous > agreement often leads to bad decisions. > > More paradoxes > https://twitter.com/david_perell/status/1378943649845678082 > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZor_Yb8EYa8438n%2BSaMSaYVVtfkPYyQ1-VDgXiT%2BNSpWMA%40mail.gmail.com.
