Pranam
Many may bypass; it's difficult to understand; but if you strain to read
where science exactly bewildered is known; and where our upanishads ( which
I have not stated here ) simply explained the nature of light agni in many
verses which is pure science.

Photons

1      Photons have no mass and always travel at the speed of light, so we
can use *p= mV *to determine their momentum.  The energy of a single photon
is: *hv* or hw= (*h*/2pi/w// where *h *is Planck's constant: 6.626 x 10-34
Joule-sec. One photon of visible light contains about 10-19 Joules (not
much!)  Theta  is the "photon flux," or the number of photons per second in
a beam. theeta= *P */ *hv *where *P *is the beam power (in watts).

2         There are two different proposals for the momentum of light in a
transparent dielectric… Despite many tests and debates over nearly a
century, momentum of light in a transparent dielectric remains
controversial.

3   Random (incoherent) light sources,  such as stars and light bulbs,
emit  photons with random arrival times  and a Bose-Einstein distribution.
Laser (coherent) light sources, on  the other hand, have a more  uniform
(but still random)  distribution: Poisson.

4   If an atom emits a photon, it "recoils" in the opposite direction. If
the atoms are excited and then emit light, the atomic beam spreads much
more than if the atoms are not excited and do not emit.  the photon
transfers some of its energy to a particle (causing the particle to
accelerate). This causes a change in the photon’s energy, and therefore in
its wavelength. Since photons carry momentum, they can therefore exert
pressure.This is known as radiation pressure.

5    "What is known of [photons] comes from observing the results of their
being created or annihilated."

6    Today's scientific thinking is dominated by a number of underlying
assumptions, spoken or unspoken.

A few of them are:

1. Time has a preferred direction.

2. Isolated experiments are the key to fundamental physical quantities.

3. Space-Time has degrees of freedom of its own.

4. Matter and _elds are particulates in nature.

5. The most fundamental constructs in physics are particles manifest in
high-energy experiments.

These fundamental elements of matter are point particles.

6. Mathematical elegance is the most important attribute of a theory.

7. The mathematics of a theory constitutes the entire theory.

8. It is not necessary for a theory to enable conceptual reasoning.

9. It is acceptable for a theory to be logically inconsistent.

10. Theory often predicts new physical phenomena.

11. The successes in technological enterprise are attributable to current
theoretical understanding.

Once these prejudices are articulated, it becomes clear that not every
person subscribes to all of them.

Some seem self-evident, some seem irrelevant, and some seem nonsense to any
given person.

Yet no two people, even if they are working in the same discipline, agree
on which is which.

And all of these ideas are, in one way or another, effectively shaping
current scientific discussion.

7      Alternate World View

As strange as it may seem, the physical world, as we observe it, can be
much more simply and elegantly understood using a quite different set of
assumptions:

1. The most fundamental constructs in physics

are the electromagnetic and gravitational interactions of matter.

2. Time enters these fundamental physical interactions in a totally
symmetric way.

The apparent preferred direction of time is thermodynamic in origin.

3. Every element of matter is coupled to all other matter on its light cone
by time-symmetric interactions.

4. Matter interacts directly with other matter.  The time-symmetric nature
of these interactions make them effectively instantaneous.

5. The properties of matter, such as its rest energy, its inertia, its
radiation reaction, its spontaneous emission, and other properties as well,
are manifestations of these interactions. There is no such thing as an
isolated experiment.

6. Fields have no degrees of freedom of their own. They are simply
bookkeeping mechanisms for the direct interaction of matter with other
matter.

7. Space-Time has no degrees of freedom of its own. It is simply a
coordinate system within which we can express physical law.

8. Matter is, at the fundamental level, wavelike in nature. There is no
such thing as a point particle. Quantization of matter is due to the
formation of bound states of matter wave functions.

9. Quantization of quantum transition energies is due to the discreteness
of these bound matter states. The _elds themselves are simply a
representation of the matter interactions. They confer no additional
constraints on those interactions.

10. A \photon" can be best viewed as a transaction between two atoms on the
same light cone. Such a transaction requires an exquisite degree of phase
matching between the quantum states of the two coupled atoms, and is
therefore a rare event. Photon statistics result from the chance
correlations of atomic wave function phases.

11. The \photon" transaction can be viewed as a brief entanglement of the
quantum states of the two participating atoms.

12. The transaction is itself a completely continuous process. When a
transaction is initiated, it grows exponentially with time. This highly
nonlinear evolution gives the appearance of an abrupt \quantum jump" as the
atomic wave functions \collapse".

13. The observed particulate \photon" behavior is not due to the nature of
_fields, but is a manifestation of entropy, related to the thermodynamic
arrow of time.

14. It is centrally important for a theory to be logically consistent.

15. Mathematical elegance is important in a theory when it aids conceptual
reasoning.

It is destructive when it obscures otherwise accessible conceptual
understanding.

16. It is rare for theory to predict new physical phenomena. In most cases
each new phenomenon is discovered/invented experimentally, and the current
theory is quickly \adjusted" so as to \predict" the observed result.

17. The successes in technological enterprise are attributable to
conceptual reasoning. \Fundamental" physical theory, as taught in
universities and propagated in the literature, has a long history of
hindering conceptual reasoning, and therefore technological progress.

8      Einstein put it: I feel it is a delusion to think of the electrons
and the _fields as two physically different, independent entities. Since
neither can exist without the other, there is only one reality to be
described which happens to have two different aspects; and the theory ought
to recognize this from the start instead of doing things twice. According
to the assumption to be contemplated here, when a light ray is spreading
out from a point, the energy is not distributed continuously over
ever-increasing spaces, but consists of a _finite number of energy quanta
that are localized in points in space, move without dividing, and can be
absorbed or generated only as a whole.

9       There is, however, another quite different way of visualizing the
photon that has a very real place in understanding coherent systems: In all
the recent Bose-Einstein work, intense laser beams are used to cool
collections of atoms to nano-Kelvin temperatures. If those beams were made
up of Copenhagen \photons", the \photon shot noise" would increase as the
square root of the intensity. What actually happens is that the cooling
improves as we increase the laser-beam intensity up to a point, after which
no further improvement is observed. The point at which this limit is
reached scales directly with the coherence of the laser beam. So that limit
is indeed the result of photon shot noise|and the photons are the places
where an otherwise completely coherent wave has a local loss of coherence|a
\phase slip".  In our coherent optical world, photons are the \noise" in an
otherwise noiseless process.

10   The idea that photons have a finite lifespan, and therefore mass, is
difficult to imagine. Indeed, astronomers looking at distant cosmic objects
regularly detect photons that are billions of years old. But some theories
suggest that photons could have a non-zero rest mass, albeit a small one –
the upper limit for the mass of the photon is constrained to 10–18 eV or
10–54 kg thanks to experiments with electric and magnetic fields. And with
this small mass, a photon could decay into other lighter elementary
particles, such as a pair of the lightest neutrino and an antineutrino, or
even particles that are currently unknown and beyond the Standard Model of
particle physics.

11    If the photon has mass and is decaying into lighter particles, then
the number density of photons in the CMB ( cosmic microwave back ground)
 should decrease as the photons travel. But this in turn would mean that
the CMB spectrum would no longer fit the near-perfect thermal curve that is
observed. As the CMB is an almost a perfect black body, very few photons,
if any, will have decayed during the 13.8-billion-year existence of the
universe and so the CMB measurements can constrain the photon’s lifetime.
( you asked where it goes)

KR IRS 5821

On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 09:47, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Instead of sending a write up of mine,I am trying to post questions for
> discussion and interaction.
> What is in reality a photon?Are we also photosynthesized?Are we as the
> arrested photons,struggling to return to natural speed of light?And is
> there a destination for photons?To where are they proceeding at the
> ultimate speed of light.And at the destination,is there a grand
> photosynthesized universe?
> YM
>
> --
> *Mar*
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CACDCHCJ02XJ_qtAcdtg2HOfWuAofvb9DGrvNz%2B1mtzAJgs70kg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/CACDCHCJ02XJ_qtAcdtg2HOfWuAofvb9DGrvNz%2B1mtzAJgs70kg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZop3xn-%2BHBpSJTjt1Q4y%3DVEKSQYjBbZLJE3hNwdM%2BhFxig%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to