QUORA QA-FORWARD

Dear friends,

This is a QA I readyesterday in the Quora website. Being lengthy I did not add 
in QA. I thought offorwarding the same. Ithought of forwarding the same for the 
reason- A lot of historical facts aretold in the answer. Read the answer 
forhistorical details 

Gopalakrishnan22-11-2021

Q           Why are Malayalees not much visitingTirupati when the whole of 
India is visiting the world famous, country’srichest and well organised temple?

A            Arun Mohan (അരുൺ മോഹൻ)A Liberal Malayaleeand Secular Indian Fri

Well,        

There are indeedMalayalees visiting Tirupati temple. I have visited Tirupati 
few years back andis planning to visit probably next year etc. I have seen some 
fellow Malayaleesin Tirupati during my last visit.

But when we look, the number of Malayalees visitingTirupati is very low. I 
don’t have statistics, but Irecollect an experience talking to a travel 
consultant during a conferenceabout developing Southern Pilgrim circuits (as I 
was representing a researchagency then who were studying on prospects of 
multiple pilgrim circuit). 

When we put ahypothesis of Kochi-Thanjavur-Tirupati-Srisailam package, the 
consultantimmediately replied - Its okay to have Thanjavur-Tirupati-Srisailam 
circuit,but extending to Kochi makes no sense without a base Malayalee pilgrim. 
Then hesaid, to understand it, its easy to look- How many direct buses/trains 
exist between Tirupati and anyplace in Kerala? Ernakulam-Tirupati distance is 
same asKottayam-Velankanni distance. But the latter has more than 7 daily buses 
andfew train options, while none exist for former. 

So that set thepremises of the question.Malayalees don’t visit in large numbers 
to Tirupati.

Majority ofKeralites who visit Tirupati are basically Konkani/Tamil Brahmin 
community ofKerala, with very few ethnic Malayalees visiting.

So the question

Why are Malayalees not much visiting Tirupati when thewhole of India is 
visiting the world famous, country’s richest and wellorganised temple?

https://www.quora.com/Why-are-Malayalees-not-much-visiting-Tirupati-when-the-whole-of-India-is-visiting-the-world-famous-country-s-richest-and-well-organised-temple

Lack of effective historicalconnections

Any pilgrimagedestination for a community, should have a historical connection 
for thatcommunity. Why Konkanis of Kerala visit Tirupati regularly? Because 
Konkanculture is heavily linked to Tirupati concepts. The Tirupati temples 
wereheavily patronized by Vijayanagara Empire and they have effectively pushed 
thelegends of Venkanteswara/Balaji among people of Deccan and the coasts. 

Tirupati is one ofthe few temples in South India, that have extensive patronage 
of most of thePan-South Indian royal dynasties starting from Pallavas, Cholas, 
Pandayas,Chalukyas, Vijayanagara and Kadambas making huge endowments and 
patronage tothis temple. Even Marathas also made huge endowments, thus 
effectively bringingthis temple popular among Marathas.

Can you identify any Malayalee Kingdom or Chera Empire inthe above list? 
Throughout the history, Keralaroyals or any upper caste communities had no 
linkages or patronage withTirupati temple. So it remained an alien temple for 
people living to the otherside of Western ghats (can’t say the same for 
Konkanis, who had better accessvia Deccan)

Without culturallinkages, its hard to connect even today. It is like asking an 
Assamese or Kashmiri Hindu tobelieve in legends of Ayyappa and visit Sabarimala 
when the entireconcept of Ayyappa is alien to them. 

Infact, a goodpercentage of Malayalees don’t even know the story of Tirupati 
Balaji. I saythis, because my aunt had a big piggy box where she kept on 
depositing 5 Rscoin on daily basis to take it to Tirupati. When one of our 
cousin came, theywere asking, why this tradition? My aunt said, its to help 
Balaji to clear his debts, which confused heras she hasn’t heard the legend at 
all. Many in Kerala are like thatonly. Its mostly the influence of 
Konkani/Tamil Brahmins, these legends startedgetting popularized in Kerala 
society. Still its very low

2. Lack of interest in Non-Tantric temples

One thing, I alwaysnoted, Malayalee Hindus are not very keen in going for 
pilgrimage outsideKerala. We may visit temples in a place while visiting the 
area/town, butrarely go for a pilgrimage as such. I haven’t seen any pilgrimage 
concept amongMalayalees to visit places like Kashi or Dwaraka or any far away 
temples. If we are touringNorth India, chances are there to visit Kashi, rather 
than a specificpilgrimage as such. Whereas such pilgrimage do happen inside 
Kerala. We havepeople going for pilgrimage to Guruvayur or temples in Malabar 
or centralKerala etc.

This is primarilybecause of underlying factor of extreme adherence to Tantric 
form of worship. Malayalee Hindupsyche is heavily tuned that temple worship 
must be Tantric in nature andnon-tantric temples aren’t much appreciated as a 
temple, rather just a holyplace. So when we visit temples in other parts of 
India, the level of bhaktivibes for Malayalees will be less and thereby we 
can’t connect to it.

Due to nature of myjob earlier and my interest, I did a great number of temple 
tours in many partsof India. For me, its more my curiosity and understanding 
the local cultureetc. I too find bit hard to connect religiously to many 
temples outside Kerala,even if some are my favourites (like Somnath temple or 
Kedarnath orChidambaram). The massivedifferences of traditions matters a lot. 
When we say temples, we expectlot of rites and specific fire based poojas, but 
often majority of templesoutside Kerala are less rite intensive and more of 
Bhajan/congregationalactivities.

When we visitedSomnath, few years back, we conducted an elaborate pooja hiring 
a pandit. Afterthe pooja, my Grandma was asking me- what was all about it, as 
it was we whodoing the pooja and Priest was chanting some generic mantras which 
doesn’tmake any sense to the context of doing pooja. 

While many ofpilgrims went high on Aarti time, most of us didn’t find anything 
big, as itwas just a bhajan. So this cultural difference matters a lot.

Tirupati temple follows different Agamas all together andthereby it may not a 
great pull factor for Malayalees

This is one keyfactor Malayalees don’t do much pilgrimage specific journeys 
outside Keralabarring 2 places (Kollur Mookambika and Palani Temple) which has 
its ownspecific historical reasons.

3. Presence of own Vaishnava culture

Kerala is not shortof any Vaishnava worship centers. The whole state has so 
many Vishnu templesand each Vishnu temple has its own huge followers region 
wise. Kerala’s Bhakti movement revolvedaround the famous temple of Guruvayur 
and it became so iconic thatmajority of Malayalees consider as the most 
celebrated Vishnu temple just likehow Telugu see Tirupati. 

Guruvayurappan- oneof the most popular deities in Kerala, whose image is found 
everywhere in thestate

As of the localtradition, there are 108 Vishnulayams or Great temples of Vishnu 
in Kerala. Out of these 108 Vishnulayams, 13temples are Divyadeshams (the 
Supreme Vishnu temples). WhereasAndhra Pradesh has only 2 Divyadeshams, out of 
which one is Tirupati temple.

When Kerala itselfhas 13 huge historical Divyadesham Vishnu temples which has 
equal status thatof Tirupati, naturally there is no huge urge to go to Tirupati 
itself.

Sree Padmanabhaswamy of Trivandrum, Navamukundan ofThirunavaya, one of the 
historic Vishnu temples in South India

Thiruvalla Sreevallabha temple, one of the mostoldest surviving Vishnu temple 
in India, with its main shrine dated back to 59BC (as per date of inscription 
of the Chakra installed on the roof the temple).The Sree vallabha Vishnu is one 
of the most praised in Divyadesham epics

The historic Aranmula temple believed to be constructedby Arjuna himself

4. Lack of associable myths

Very often the urgeto visit a far away temple for pilgrimage, is most guided by 
some sort ofreligious superstitions or mythical beliefs of attaining something. 
For example, a visit toKashi/Ramaeswaram temple are associated with Moksha, a 
visit toChidambaram temple is associated with dance, a visit to Mookambika 
isassociated with blessings of wisdom/artistic growth, a visit to Sabarimala 
isassociated with attaining spiritual growth in life, a visit to Guruvayur 
isassociated with being in company of Krishna, a visit to Madurai temple 
isassociated with marriage/fertility, a visit to Palani temple is associated 
withprotection etc.

Tirupati temple don’t have similar mythical beliefs togetting/attaining 
anything specific, other than general blessings.Generally the underlying desire 
of pilgrimage is mostly for having moreprosperity in life in form of blessings, 
thereby earn more in life. InTirupati’s case, the belief is that, we need to 
pay to the God to clear hisdebts. Its opposite of basic reason to visit a new 
pilgrimage place. 

Naturally thats adisincentive. Why should I visit a new far away pilgrimage 
where I need to paymoney to clear the deity’s debts? Thats not so interesting 
preposition to tryout, unless you are strong devotee.

5. Kerala has its own Thirumala concept

This is somethingmany Non Malayalees dont’ know much.

Cochin has itsown largest Konkani temple dedicated to Thiru Venkathachalapathy 
/Venkatheswaraknown as Cochin Thirumala Devasthanam Temple, also known as 
Goshripuram Balaji temple whichhas its own independent history/myth outside 
Tirupati

The famous CochinThirumala Devasthanam temple in Mattancherry (Kochi Island)

HistoricallyTirupati was one of the royal temples of Vijayanagara Empires and 
theseEmperors patronized the temple and its deity in a big way. That time, 
Tirupatiwas very small temple and its deity wasn’t that popular among Masses.

One of theVijayanagar’s Emperor- Saluva Narasimha Deva Raya was an adherent 
devotee ofVenkatachalapaty and he regularly visited Tirupati temple every 
month. Due tosome accident or war, this tradition was broken inbetween and he 
couldn’t visitTirupati temple which made him depressed in a big way. That 
night, he got adivine vision of Lord appearing in front of him and said that he 
was pleasedwith devotion of the Emperor, so he himself will come to his Palace. 
Next daymorning, a sculptor came to his court and said that he can build the 
mostexquisite idol of Venkatachalapaty and went into the pooja room of the king 
tobuild one. He shut the room and months passed, no information about 
him.Impatiently, the king broke the pooja room, to see an idolof 
Venkatachalapathy along with Sreedevi and Bhoodevi in the room with no traceof 
the sculptor. Realizing it was a divine work, this Swayamboo idolwas worshiped 
at the imperial court of Hampi by all the Vijayanagara emperorsincluding 
Krishnadevaraya.

The originalidols of Thirumala Venkathachalapaty with Sreedevi and Bhoodevi 
along withVijayanagara Salagram as worshipped in Cochin Thirumala Temple today

After collapse ofthe Vijayanagara empire and ruining of Hampi, the wherabouts 
of this idol wasunknown, untill a Konkani seer- Vijendra Theertha of Kumbakonam 
Muttaccidentally discovered it. He placed the idol in a shrine near Mutt in 
today’sGoa region and lived there for sometime. However it was the time of 
Portugueseinquisition of Goa and Hindus of the region were persecuted by 
Portuguese. Thismade lot of Gowda Saraswata Brahmins in the region fleeing the 
place andVijendra Theertha also fled with this idol. He saw a vision of an 
Island calledGoshreepuram and understood that its somewhere in central part of 
Kerala. Heand his followers came to this island which was the-then Capital 
ofPerumpadappu Swaroopam (old name of Kochi Royal Dynasty) and the King 
grantedland for Vijendra Theertha and his followers to settle down in the 
GoshreepuramIsland (modern Mattancherry), close to his Palace. Some additional 
land wasallotted to build a temple for the idol too as Kochi Kings were 
adherent Vishnubelievers and they found the idol as Vishnu.

With this, in 1599, Vijendra Theertha along with hisfollower commissioned a 
temple called Goshree Thirumala Temple. The King ofKochi himself came to pray 
at this temple, thereby itwas granted with status equal to Royal temple 
(Mahakshetram, but not officiallya Kshetram in that time, as they weren’t 
following Tantric law), which gave alegal cover to the temple from any 
Portuguese atrocities (as Portuguese willnot attack Royal temples of their 
ally- Cochin Kings) 

However, thistemple was destroyed by Portuguese in 1662 (as Portuguese felt 
that the mainpriest of the temple was a spy to invading Dutch forces of Ceylon; 
in realitythe priest was secret agent of Kochi Queen in having a deal with 
Dutch toinvade Kochi as to overthrow Portuguese who was Cochin’s official ally 
then).The priest and few elders escaped with the idol on the previous night of 
attackto Udayamperoor region which was beyond direct influence of Portuguese. 
In thatvillage, they took pledge to divide themselves to establish 16 Konkani 
villagesin the region and rotate the idol between the village to avoid 
Portugueseattacking one common place. As a result, 16 villages, all bearing the 
title ofTirumala came in Central Kerala. However in 1663, Portuguese was 
defeated byDutch and Dutch India was established. Dutch were least concerned 
aboutreligion and they welcomed back Konkanis to Kochi (as Konkanis were 
goodtraders which Dutch liked the most)

A new Dutchfunded temple came up in Kochi by mid 1700s and Konkanis prospered 
heavilyaround this temple, making it famous

However, thispeaceful period didn’t last long, as Kochi got its new powerful 
King- SakthanThampuran who didn’t like Konkani-Dutch business influence over 
economy of Kochiislands. He ordered Konkanis to invest in his new capital- 
Thrissur, butKonkani leaders refused as they felt comfortable to be near to 
Dutch enclave ofFort Kochi (in Mattancherry). This was seen as insult to Kochi 
King, so Sakthan Thampuran ordered CochinRoyal Army to invade Mattancherry and 
destroy Thirumala temple aswell as plunder Konkani homes. A huge army of Kochi 
reached Kochi isles anddestroyed the main temple and looted the entire wealth 
stored in the temple(approx 1.6 Lakh of Golden Fanams, the imperial currency) 
which was taken toThrissur. The leaders of this community appealed Dutch 
assistance, howeverDutch government rejected citing as internal matter of Kochi 
Kingdom. With noother alternative, the community escaped to Alleppey along with 
the idol of Venkathachalapaty from theruined temple. Alleppey was part of 
Travancore Kingdom and the Prime Ministerof Travancore- Raja Keshavadas was 
building a new city (Alappuzha)to push Travancore’s mercantile interests. These 
desperate Konkanis soughtassistance of Dharma Raja Karthika Thirunal- Maharaja 
of Travancore, whoordered to grant a space in Alappuzha town, near to the Grand 
Canal whichKeshavadas commissioned. Thus they settled there, forming the new 
Tirumala Temple at Alleppey.

Alappuzha ThirumalaDevasthanam Temple

Howeverin 1801, Sakthan Thampuran (who was old by then) felt sorry for what he 
donewith Konkani community as well as destruction of their Vishnutemple. He 
decided to apologize and settle the matter by sending emissaries to Alleppey as 
partof bringing them back to Kochi. Though initially, they refused, the 
extremepersuasion of the Crown Prince Kerala Varma, finally made Konkanis 
tomove back to Kochi in 1805 AD and later Cochin Government funded a huge 
templecalled Cochin Thirumala Devasthanam (as a token of repatriation of the 
moneylooted by Cochin Royal Army) and the idol of Venkachalapathy was brought 
back to Kochi in grandestmanner in typical Konkani style called Brahmasolavam 
on goldenchariot and consecrated in the new temple.

The impact ofrotation of the idol in 1660s and shifting to Alleppey in 1790 
created a newculture- Multiple Thirumala temples in Central Kerala. Where-ever 
theoriginal idol has gone, a regular temple called Thirumal Devasthanam came up.

With passage of Kochi Devaswom Law in 1820s, all thesemultiple Thirumala 
temples to be brought under one single management calledCochin Thirumala 
Devasthanam Devaswom or TD Devaswom which wasunique as both Royal Governments 
of Kochi and Travancore didn’t see it asKerala temples, so allowed CTD Devaswom 
to function as a private Devaswom withstate scrutiny, thereby exempting it from 
Crown control. 

So even today, CTD Devaswom remains the only mainstreamDevaswom board outside 
Kerala Govt control (though TDDevaswom reports to High Court’s Devaswom Bench)

The presence of CTDDevaswom temples means, we have our own version of 
Venkatachalapathy, outsideTirupati beliefs. Historically Konkanis living in 
Kerala worshipped these CTDtemples only. It was mostly after intense marketing 
of Tirupati Temple in 70sand 80s, many among started visiting Tirupati temple 
seeing it as Moolasthanamof their temple.

Even today, the Thirumala temple in Kochi has moreprominence among GSB 
community more than Tirupati. So the ritualsand traditions are identical. As 
GSB community is a very rich entrepreneurialcommunity, they kept on building 
more Thirumala temples inside Kerala. A secondThirumala Devasthanam temple is 
constructed inside Kochi in MG Road as well asanother in Tripunithura.

So most of Konkanisand non Malayalee communities keep on worshipping these 
temples as main temple.So the urge to rush to Tirupati is lower, as they often 
say, they have an equaltemple in Kochi.

And the original temple of Cochin Thirumala Devasthanamis officially declared 
as Mahakshetram or Grand Temple by erstwhile TantraSabha -the Tantric council 
(later officially recognized byKerala Government in 1970s), the only Non 
Tantric temple to have such anofficial status in Kerala. Such a status means, 
many Malayalees also recognizeit akin to their temple concept, even though the 
pooja system is different,something with Tirupati temple doesn’t have.

Brahmotsavam ofGoshripuraesha, another name for Cochin Venkateswara. This 
festival is to remindthe grand arrival of Venkatheswara back to Kochi from 
Alleppey in its newcurrent temple.

The famous SreeLakshmi Venkatha Kalyanam tradition held at Cochin Thirumala 
temple, whichattract lakhs of devotees across Kerala

Due to all these reasons, Malayalees don’t find muchvalue to visit Tirupati. 
For me, going to our Thirumalatemple is more better than travelling to 
Tirupati, as the concept is same.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/1390713980.422514.1637566991277%40mail.yahoo.com.

Reply via email to