Pranam
Judicial system from Ramayana days till date is only to heaR THE
FACTS AS TOLD TO A PODIUM, AS TO WHAT WOULD HAVE BEEN DONE OR NOT, WHICH
WERE NOT SEEN OR HEARD BY ANYONE FULLY BUT FOR BETWEEN ONLY IN BETWEEN THE
TWO FACTIONS. Hence the facts were verbally created by the intelligence as
SCIENCE. JUDGE is one who has to sift not by law but by the erudition and
experiences and render justice by Law. Judge cannot OPINE; but today we see
only that; if the courts cannot interfere in QUOTA, then why do they
interfere in fixation or otherwise? Thus one advocate does lie. Evidence is
fabricated as in Michael Nagar videos. The law prosecutors failed to gather
the evidence but run down as machineries fabricating cashews wrt the money
they can earn otherwise; and the courts are not exempt. Only the bottom can
be intimidated. That is true democracy and enforcement of law and Justice.
( I am led to believe that 99% skip good stuff). However, as a topic on
Justice arose I shall write sooner how our smrithi and Mimasa viewed the
Justice which are copied with their European look out but we failed to do
so but adopted their constitution to our country. KR IRS 28/01/22
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 11:28, Srinivasan Sridharan <
[email protected]> wrote:
> There is this long time doubt for me.
> In olden days the. King or his nominee was the judge who used tol listen
> to the plaintif and the defender. He may call for witnesses if necessary
> and the police would arrange the witnesses to be brought to the court and
> answer the judge. The judge will then deliver the judgement and there will
> be no more appeals. If the judge is famliar with the law where is the
> need for lawyers? It is. obvious that in any litigation at least one of the
> two lawyers is telling lies! Why then should this faulty system of justice
> is being followed everywhere?
> Sridharan.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 26, 2022, at 8:52 PM, Rajaram Krishnamurthy <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>
> Pranam
> Courts many a times as well as advocates interpreting words and
> letters; and judgements were funny too; thank GOD they did not say it is
> per-son and per -daughter; you may be aware the cases aunder "person" under
> the incometac act after 1961 act. KR IRS 27/1/22
>
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 08:32, Rangarajan T.N.C. <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Courts interpreted 'person' as not including woman.
>> https://kvtrust.blogspot.com/2020/11/women-rights-person-clause-and.html
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Thatha_Patty" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZorL3%2BNMPkf6_GofaKSTtT172t4br8OgR9vxj_3DjJQpFg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZorL3%2BNMPkf6_GofaKSTtT172t4br8OgR9vxj_3DjJQpFg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqJ6YiaFPvPuueivnzJhrHtMYaWrY3%3DXDL8pdN0XHgAkQ%40mail.gmail.com.
