Pranam
Conspiracies against Sanatana Dharma by East India Co, Max Muller, Wilson,
Jones and others Part III -
While searching for quotes from Upanishads from our shastras, the
author found that some upanishads, Gitas and Portions of Upanishads are not
considered as authentic by the scholars. The objections were, in first
place, raised by Western scholars whom we thought were neutral and such
critical work is accepted by a rational mind. However, the author found out
that the western scholars were not neutral but had an agenda. There was a
nexus of Church-Govt-Army which was working to destroy the pillars of
Sanatana Dharma to achieve their own objective.
2 British East India Company wanted to rule India. In this quest they
setup Asiatic Society with 24 + members, like H.H. Wilson, Jones and others
to interpret our shasras in a demeaning way. They also hired Max Muller to
interpret shastras in a wicked way. they also made attempts to demean our
deva bhASa sanskrit and tried to create Pro-Indo-Euro Language as the
mother of all languages including Sanskrit.
3 Britishers in a quest to rule us have done a lot of conspiracies to
damage our social, cultural, economic, and religious systems. Britishers
realized that our culture and spiritual base was so strong that it is not
possible to convert people just by giving lectures on Bible. They concluded
that the only way to push our way of life, and rule them was to demean
their backbone - spirituality. To carry out their plan, they created
Asiatic society and hired many professionals who were send to India with
sole purpose of demeaning and denigrate our religious philosophy as
inferior, mythology, primitive, supporting animal and human sacrifice,
imaginative and full of superstitions. Then began a period of collecting
manuscripts and then interpret them in derogatory way. They also paid lofty
amount to Max Muller, a German philologist, who is often credited of
interpreting vedas- and bringing them to west and general public. Max
Muller was also one of them who purposefully interpreted our shastra-s in
derogatory way. Other members of Asiatic Society were :
Max Muller - Translation of Rig veda in demeaning way and other articles
targeting our shastras to degrade them.
2 Sir William Jones
3 J. D. Peterson
4 F. Wilford
5 H.H. Wilson - Translation of Vishnu PurANa in demeaning way
6 F.E. Partiger - Critical analysis of purANas and veda-s in demeaning way
7 Sir Monier-Williams
8 Colonel Colin Mackenzie
9 Franz Bopp
10 Pandit Taranath (Indian writer hired to write on Hinduism in
derogatory way) (the list extends to 34 names). The list also includes
Britannica encyclopedia, who added Hindu words and explained their meanings
in demeaning way. They influenced Hindu writers like
Surendradas Gupta ,
Dr. R.G. Bhandarkar - highly influenced by Max Muller's works and his
research
Bal Gandhar Tilak - who dated vedas to 1500-200 BC
S. Radhakrishnan - whose works are used for post graduation in History and
religion of India
*All these writers never wrote anything on Christianity. Why? *If one is
interested in studying religions of others, they also study their first
religion. No one keeps studying and publishing foreign religion throughout
their life and not study and publish something about their own religion.
This shows the wicked mentality of the then Britishers.
4 How history distortional?
A They forged our shastras which include BhaviSya purana, by adding
Jesus, changing date of Chandragupta Maurya calling him a contemporary of
Alexander. To maintain consistency, they also pushed date of Lord Buddha
and made him younger by 1500-2000 years. This also resulted in postponement
of date of our beloved Acharya Adi Shankara, who as of 1999. Should have
been born 2500 years ago.
B They also changed and interpolated dharma smriti-s, Gruhya sutra-s,
puranas, kalpa sutras and our vedas also. They did this to endorse animal
killing, sleeping with animals for carnal pleasure and other prohibited
acts, as are depicted as approved by our shastras.
C They forged fake coins of Chandragupta Maurya to support their claims.
D They destroyed our historic records and evidences, destroyed our faith,
our culture and left of opportunity to project us, BhArtiyas as poor- chaps
of inferior intelligence, and of superstitious and primitive nature.
E Created fake Aryan Invasion theory to make us feel homeless. According
to this theory, Germans (Aryans, Sanskrit speaking people of high
intelligence) migrated to India and they taught us everything.
F Demean our holy deva-Bhasa, Sanskrit. Initially they could not find
any concrete evidence of any language prior to Sanskrit. So, they created
a fake proto-Indo-European language, (PIE) which is the root of all.
G Compared our Devatas with Greek and other mythologies and equating them
with nature spirits.
H Calling our puranas are mythology.
5 There were some Indian Pundits who were genuinely interested in
fact-finding. They saw the truth was different then that is propagated. One
such revered Pundit was srI Narayana Sastry. He did 20 years of research,
refuted false claims by Britishers and attempted to publish them. Since he
did not had enough finding, he split his research in 8 volumes. In 1916,
The first volume was published under the title, 'The Age of Shankra'. In
the introduction of this book, Pt. Narayana Sastry wrote contents of full
800 pages book which he was going to publish in future. In 1917, his other
book, 'The Kings of Magadha' was published in which he extensively quoted
from bhaviSya purANa. (Kaliyug Rajvrittant)
But immediately after that, his entire 20 years of hard work mysteriously
disappeared and long with his written books and manuscripts and a year
after that he died. The facts he brought were
1. Established date of SankarAcArya 2593 of kaliyug to 2625, which comes to
509-477 BC, while refuting arguments of western writers and gave a full
history of all five maths (including kamakoti math) of SankarAcArya with
his discipline successions.
2. Refuted the arguments of western writers and correctly proved the date
of Mahabharata as 3139 BC
3. Established date of Lord Buddha in 10th century BC; 1000BCE.
4. Points of deliberate misinterpretations by European writers in the
Rajtarangini and fixed the correct chronology of the kings of Kashmir
5. Refuted the Identity of Chandragupta Maurya with Sandracottus
(Sandrocottus) by Jones
6. Produced unbroken list of historic dates of the kings of Nepal from the
end of dvapAra yUga up to the 20th century
7. Refuted the arguments of the European writers and established the
correct dates of the kings of Magadha from Brihadrath dynasty up to the
Gupta dynasty according to the puranas and also the inscriptions and the
coins, etc
8. Pointed out fabrications of European writers how have they manipulated
the interpretations of edicts, coins and the inscriptions to align it with
Ashok Vardhan of Maurya dynasty (which in fact was related to Ashok Aditya
of Gupta dynasty).
9. Gave full date-wise list of the king of lunar dynasties (chandra vamSa)
and also of solar dynasties (sUrya vamSa) ... but that valuable work was
all destroyed as a piece of their simple diplomatic game.
10 Even now, the records of pUrI, dvArkA, kAmakotI and GauDa sArasvat
(GAuDapadAcArya's lineage) maths shows that the actual birth of our gurU
Adi Sankara was 509 - 477 BC.
6 MONIER-WILLIAMS English Sanskrit Dictionary Published by Oxford Press
from 1811 was/ is regarded as monumental work which took years to compile.
Boden Group was created by Colonel Boden to carry out the work. First to
occupy chair was Sir H.H. Wilson. Second was Sir Monier Williams. In
preface IX, Monier Williams commits that the chief aim for creating
Sanskrit-English dictionary was to understand the philosophy of Native
Indians. Then use it for conversion of Native Indians to Christianity. He
has also said that Old and New Testament was translated into Sanskrit. This
would help Missionaries o understand Sanskrit better. Monier-Williams has
also committed that due to wrong approach and policy by H.H. Wilson, the
dictionary has suffered great loss. Please find excerpts taken from Intro
and Preface IX as proof below:
‘” I INTRODUCTION. Xxxi Nevertheless, sincerity obliges me to
confess that, during my long literary career, my mind has had to pass
through a kind of painful discipline involving a gradual weakening of faith
in the trustworthiness of my fellow men, not excepting that of my first
venerated teacher. (Not this is most probably H. Wilson) I began my
studies, indeed, with much confidence in the thought that one man existed
on whom I could lean as an almost infallible guide; but as I grew a little
wiser, and my sensitiveness to error sharpened, I discovered to my surprise
that I was compelled to reject much of his teaching as doubtful*. *Nay, I
am constrained to confess that as I advanced further on the path of
knowledge, my trustfulness in others, besides my old master, experienced by
degrees a series of disagreeable and unexpected shocks; till now, that I
have arrived at nearly the end of my journey, I find myself left with my
faith in the accuracy of human beings generally—and certainly not excepting
myself—somewhat distressingly disturbed. Such painful feelings result, I
fear, in my own case from a gradual and inevitable growth of the critical
faculty during a long lifetime, and are quite consistent with a sense
of gratitude for the effective aid received from my collaborators, without
which, indeed, I could not have brought this work to a conclusion.
II In my original Preface I expressed my thanks to each and all of the
scholars who aided me in the compilation of the first edition, and whose
names in the chronological order of their services were as follow
The late Rev. J. Wenger, of the Baptist Mission, Calcutta; Dr. Franz
Kielhorn, afterwards Superintendent of Sanskrit Studies in Deccan College,
Poona, and now Professor of Sanskrit in the University of Gottingen; Dr.
Hermann Brunnhofer; Mr. A. E. Gough, M.A., of Lincoln College, Oxford,
sometime Professor in the Government Colleges of Benares, Allahabad, and
Calcutta; and lastly, Mr. E. L. Hogarth, M.A., of Brasenose College,
sometime Head Master of the Government Provincial School at Calicut.
III INTRODUCTION.SECTION I. As to my own course, the same
consideration which actuated my predecessor operated in my case, when I was
elected to fill the Boden Chair in his room in 1860....
Nevertheless I could not quite renounce an idea which my classical training
at Oxford had forcibly impressed upon my mind—viz. that the primary object
of a Sanskrit Dictionary should be to exhibit, by a lucid etymological
arrangement*,* the structure of a language which, as most people know, is
not only the elder sister of Greek, but the best guide to the structure of
Greek, as well as of every other member of the Aryan or Indo-European
family—a language, in short, which is the very key-stone of the science of
comparative philology. This was in truth the chief factor in determining
the plan which, as I now proceed to show, I ultimately carried into
execution.
*Note: This is the reason why Monier Williams thought that the dictionary
has suffered great loss.*
IV
1 This will be found in the library presented by me to the Indian
Institute, Oxford.
2 The main object was really a missionary one, as I have shown in the
Preface to this volume (p. ix), and in my Life of H. H. Wilson appended to
my Reminiscences of Old Haileybury College (published by A. Constable &
Co.).
3 His first Dictionary was published in 1819, and his second in 1832, while
he *(H. H. Wilson) *was a candidate for the Boden Professorship.
V PREFACE TO THE NEW EDITION.ix
In explanation I must draw attention to the fact that I am only the
second occupant of the Boden Chair, and that its Founder, Colonel Boden,
stated most explicitly in his will (dated August 15, 1811) that the special
object of his munificent bequest was to promote the translation of the
Scriptures into Sanskrit, so as ‘ to enable his countrymen to proceed in
the conversion of the natives of India to the Christian Religion' V...
VI 4 In his address proposing himself for election to the Boden
Electors, Professor H. H. Wilson laid stress on what he had done for ‘ the
rendering of Scripture Terms into the Sanskrit language/ It was doubtless
on this account that after he was elected he urged me to compile an
English-Sanskrit Dictionary—a work never before attempted. I laboured at
this for about seven years, and although the result (published in a thick
volume by the Directors of the East India Company in 1851) cannot, I fear,
be said to meet the needs of the present day, yet it should be borne in
mind that it was pioneering work. Nor can it be said to have been useless,
seeing that seven years after its publication the following testimony to
its utility was voluntarily tendered by the Rev. J. Wenger, translator of
the Bible into Sanskrit and Editor of Dr. Yates’ Sanskrit. Die-
VII X PREFACE TO THE NEW EDITION,
...the promotion of a better knowledge of the religions and customs of
India, as the best key to a knowledge of the religious needs of our great
Eastern Dependency. My very first public lecture delivered after my
election in 1860 was on ‘The Study of Sanskrit in Relation to Missionary
Work in India’ (published in 1861)....It was on this account that, when my
distinguished predecessor and teacher, Professor H. H. Wilson, was a
candidate for the Chair in 1832, his lexicographical labours were put
forward as his principal claim to election.
VIII Surely then it need not be thought surprising, if following in the
footsteps of my venerated master, I have made it the chief aim of my
professorial life to provide facilities for the translation of our sacred
Scriptures into Sanskrit 4 , and for ... 1 I cannot allow myself to think
that the Dictionary has suffered much from this cause, except perhaps
during the collaboration of the late Dr. Schonberg, the rapid impairment of
whose powers did not at first strike me so as to make me aware of the
necessity for increased vigilance on my part (see p. xxxi).
M. F. Monier-Williams. May 4, 1899”
The extracts are taken from the book "The True History and the Religion of
India: An Encyclopaedia of Authentic Hinduism" by H. D. Swami Prakashanand
Saraswati) KR IRS 5222
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooVFOMiDJ_8XyGvCCgOefF8u%2BRiqCj0t%3DRppUS5hL1Mag%40mail.gmail.com.
