Pranam
Good thinking like a nastika thinks. I had written about the science, proof
etc elsewhere, maybe Mr Sri Ramajayam article tagged with. Cell divisions
caused the palmer lines; A person is a form of emotional interaction and
also cosmic participation. Nature cannot understand unnatural things; The
biggest blunder imposed by those in the occupation as Palmist is, they
attempt to predict the performance of the person, in the economic, social
and political fields. Nature has nothing to do with economics, or politics
or sociology, the blunders developed on the lines of Newtonian mechanics..
Please do not get indicted that I used the word nastika; nastika is
not a bad word; one who believes is asti @ aastka; one who does not believe
is Nasti @ Nastika. The latter forgets that unless some thing existed, one
cannot deny; but vehemently denies it; because, he did not know about it;
and he would not like to dig on own accord; but would expect the 3rd party
to explain, so as to make one understand; yet it is the mind acting
diabolically; one the reason is believable and may grind over; another is
why should I ?; keep asking why a dot after that word?; so on so forth;
till the end remain stoic. Science was known as Bhautikam before someone
quoted the greek Abcd FOR THE SCIENCE; science @ Bhautikam speaks about the
akasha, agni, aapa, vayu and the earth only. Nature is bhautikam. Only the
exostence can be spoken and only the existence can be denied. {Bhautika
(भौतिक) [Also spelled bhautik]:—(*a*) material, physical, mundane;
corporeal; elemental; -[*cikitsā*] physiotherapy; ~[*tā*] materialism;
materialistic outlook; -[*bhūgola*] physical geography; ~[*vāda/~vāditā*]
materialism; ~[*vādī*] a materialist; materialistic; ~[*vijñāna*] physics;
~[*vid*] a physicist; —[*sādhana*] material resources; —[*sukha*]
physical/material happiness; —[*sukha-suvidhāeṃ*] material amenities.}
Brahma sutra bhautika and life-Adi shankara treatise
“Ubhayatha/ api/ na/ karma/ atas/ tadabhavah II.2.12 (183)”
In both cases also (in the cases of the Adrishta (unseen) , the unseen
principle inhering either in the (1) atoms{the science bhautika @
vaiseshika} or the soul (birth and death cause ,karma accountability etc
AAnmeeka) the activity (of the atoms) is not possible; hence negation of
that (viz.,creation through the union of the atoms). { Indian Vedic
thinking does not accept the atom as be-all & end-all; but the cause of
force behind the soul manifested as Brahmam is the cause of creation or the
manifestations; that which were perishable were/are/will be, embedded with
the atoms {theory of the science or Vaiseshikas then the scientists were
named}, while that which is unperishable is the soul which the upanishads
speak of).
Ubhayatha: in either case, in both ways, on both assumptions or
hypotheses;
Api: also;
Na: not;
Karma: action, activity, motion;
Atah:therefore;
Tadabhavah: absence of that, negation of that, i.e., negation of the
creation of the world by union of atoms.The argument against the Vaiseshika
system commenced inSutra 11 is con tinued.
What is the cause that first operates on the ultimate atoms?
Vaiseshikas hold that the motion which is due to the unseen principle
(Adrishta) joins the atom in which it resides, to another atom. Thus bi
-nary compounds, etc. are produced and finally the element of air.
Similarly fire, water, earth, the body with its organs are produced.
Thus the whole world originates from atoms. The qualities of the binary
compounds are produced from the qualities inherent in the atoms, just as
the qualities of the cloth result from the qualities of the threads. Such
is the teaching of the Vaiseshika system of philosophy.
The motion in the atoms can not be brought about by the Adrishta
residing in the atoms, because the Adrishta which is the resultant of the
good and bad actions of the soul can not reside in the atoms. It must be
here in the soul. The Adrishta residing in the soul can not produce motion
in the atom. The motion of the atom is not explained on both these views.
As Adrishta is sentient it can not act. As Adrishta is in the soul, how can
it operate in the atoms? If it can, such an operation will go on forever as
there is no agency to control it. When two atoms combine do they unite
perfectly or not? If they unite to tally, if there is total
interpenetration, the atomic state will continue as there will be no
increase in bulk. If in part, then atoms will have parts. This is against
the theory of the Vaiseshikas. Moreover, if they combine once, there can
not be separation or dissolution. Adrishta will be active to bring about
creation for the enjoyment of the fruits of actions. { To be contd}
KR IRS 18422
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 at 05:34, Markendeya Yeddanapudi <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> --
> *Mar*Lines, Grooves, Folds or Wrinkles on the Palm
>
>
>
> A baby starts as a Zygote. The Zygote divides into two, two into four,
> four into eight..., on and on till it becomes a full baby after nine
> months, to arrive into the world outside the mother’s womb. In the fifth
> month, when the body frame of the baby is developing, lines on its palms,
> as folds or as wrinkles develop, called the palmar lines. They too must be
> the result of the cell division, where cells embed. They must be in
> accordance of the scheme in the formation of the baby as per the DNA.
>
> The question is whether they indicate, the Genome of the baby, whether the
> DNA can be read from those lines.
>
> The biggest blunder imposed by those in the occupation as Palmist is, they
> attempt to predict the performance of the person, in the economic, social
> and political fields. Nature has nothing to do with economics, or politics
> or sociology, the blunders developed on the lines of Newtonian mechanics.
>
> A person is a form of emotional interaction and also cosmic participation.
> Nature cannot understand unnatural things-economics, politics, sociology
> etc which are not based on geography and ecology.
>
> The lines on the palms may indicate the road of emotional life and the
> impact on the cosmos only. They may indicate the emotional and perception
> tendencies and not the events in economic life.
>
> Even after the advent of Quantum Physics, where the language of Newtonian
> mechanics fails, the various subjects developed on the lines of Newtonian
> Mechanics, are continued. We still do not study any life science from the
> emotional angle, the life form as a form of emotion, though the central
> subject of quantum physics is consciousness, and conscious notice as part
> of the great vacuum.
>
> YM
>
>
>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZooHCseFKfCSwWAFTcenZbs8f8aaffSKxH_2yGuREZG0sA%40mail.gmail.com.
