KR:  Some time back someone wrote here that the highest speed is only the
photon and I gave some more in that column. Now the research latest does
show that read under and those wished can read the paper also in the last
line by clicking “here”.

A relevant question that remains to be answered is  whether tachyons –
understood
as localized lumps of energy traveling with superluminal speeds – can
physically exist [30]. As was shown here, and earlier in [1], special
relativity does not exclude such a possibility. In quantum field theory,
mechanisms of spontaneous symmetry breaking, such as the Higgs mechanism,
involve fields whose mass squared is negative in the unbroken phase [31],
so excitations of those fields can be regarded as tachyons [32, 33]. In the
phase with broken symmetry, those fields are expanded around a degenerate
local minimum, so their excitations have positive mass squared and are
known as Higgs particles behaving as regular, subluminal particles.
However, the basic principle of the mechanism always involves tachyons as a
starting point. Given rather interesting kinematics and dynamics of
superluminal particles discussed in this work, it would be interesting to
explore this initial phase before symmetry breaking in more detail and the
role of tachyons therein.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

*NEW SUPERLUMINAL THEORY TRANSFORMS OUR CONCEPT OF TIME WITH “EXTENSION” OF
SPECIAL RELATIVITY*

Theoretical physicists from Warsaw and Oxford universities argue that a
superluminal world possessing three temporal dimensions and one dimension
in space could potentially change our concept of time, according to a new
paper.

The researchers involved say they have developed “an extension of special
relativity” that incorporates three individual time dimensions with a
single space dimension, which helps explain how observations made by
“superluminal” observers—inertial observers moving faster than the speed of
light—might appear.

Within such a framework, the researchers argue that spontaneous events that
can occur in the absence of a deterministic cause and other strange
phenomena would be experienced by observers moving faster than the speed of
light within a vacuum, concepts that potentially transform our concept of
time as we know it.

However, they further argue that superluminal objects would require
descriptions within the framework of field theory, meaning the existence of
such objects is logically consistent with past models.

Based on past observations by lead author Andrzej Dragan and colleague
Artur Ekert, the pair and their co-authors of a recent paper argue that
such an extension of special relativity would not give rise to paradoxes as
past research has proposed.

“Instead,” they write, “such an extension modifies the notion of causality
in the same way quantum theory does.” The researchers cite alleged problems
proposed in the past that are related to the relationship between cause and
effect, which result from the presence of superluminal particles when
viewed within existing frameworks for relativity, where only one dimension
of space and time is presumed to exist.

In their new paper, the authors modify this argument by proposing three
dimensions of time and a single spatial dimension, which they acknowledge
does give rise to its own problems.

According to Dragan and Ekert, “generalizing this scheme to a relativistic
framework in a 1+3-dimensional spacetime poses some serious challenges,
both mathematical and interpretational.” However, the researchers believe
the answer to overcoming these challenges involves the extension of special
relativity to incorporate frames of reference that might occur at
faster-than-light speeds.

“[O]ne of the most interesting aspects of extending special relativity to
superluminal frames of reference is the emergence of field theory,” the
authors write in their paper, involving the combination of classical field
theory, special relativity, and quantum mechanics.

Building on the concepts presented in Einstein’s special theory of
relativity, Dragan and his co-authors relied on Einstein’s assumption that
inertial systems are uniform, and that all inertial observers are therefore
equal. Einstein outlined this in his theory with regard to observers that
are moving relative to each other at speeds far slower than the speed of
light, although Dragan and his co-authors argue that even at “superluminal”
greater than light speeds, an observer should still be subject to the same
laws of physics.

If an observer were viewing our world from such a hypothetical superluminal
point of view, one result would be that the principles of quantum mechanics
could thereby be incorporated within the special theory of relativity. This
concept was first proposed by Dragan and Ekert in a paper two years ago,
where they initially looked at only single time and space dimensions, or a
1 + 1 spacetime.

However, Dragan, Ekert, and their co-authors now extend this model to
incorporate a 1 + 3 spacetime, where they argue that an observer moving
superluminal would perceive only one dimension of this world as having a
spatial component, within which particle movement can occur. A particle
viewed by this observer would be perceived to age with respect to each of
the three-time dimensions—something you or I would view as a particle
engaged in simultaneous movement in several directions of space. In other
words, the authors say that in our space time frame of reference, we would
be viewing the same singular particle, but seen from our perspective as the
propagation of a quantum-mechanical spherical wave.

Breaking this concept down further, Dragan recently said in a press release
that this idea builds off the Huygens-Fresnel principle, which states that
each point on a wave becomes the source of a new spherical “wavelet,” each
of which mutually interferes with the other to form an entirely new
wavefront. Originally this principle was only applied to light, but within
the context of quantum mechanics, it has since been extended to all forms
of matter.

By including superluminal observers, the researchers now argue that our
concepts of velocity and kinematics must be redefined. Doing so preserves
Einstein’s assumptions about the speed of light within a vacuum as a
universal constant, even when viewed by a superluminal observer. Dragan,
Ekert, and their co-authors argue that their seemingly bold proposition of
extending special relativity to include three time dimensions and a single
space dimension is not unwarranted and, in fact, makes perfect sense.

Fundamentally, what the researchers say this allows for is a very different
view of reality than the one we are used to. Classical Newtonian
observations of a “point particle” no longer make sense for a superluminal
observer and instead require viewing such phenomena as a field, which the
authors say would be the only way that the physical world can accurately be
described.

“Until recently it was generally believed that postulates underlying
quantum theory are fundamental and cannot be derived from anything more
basic,” the authors write in their paper.

“In this work we showed that the justification of quantum theory using
extended relativity… can be naturally generalized to 1 + 3 spacetime and
such an extension leads to the field-theoretic formulation of quantum
theory.”

“This justifies, or at least provides a plausibility argument, why this
extension is not just an eccentric thought exercise,” the authors say, “but
reflects something fundamental about symmetries of laws of physics.”

The team’s paper, “Relativity of superluminal observers in 1+3 spacetime,”
was accepted for publication and can currently be read in its entirety here
<https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6382/acad60/pdf>.

KR IRS 241222

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZop9vAqx6%3DA0sznqMv9ndeeR6BXqr5CE%3DZwqHXPWs%3DEeTg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to