Scientists Have Solved a Long-Standing Genomic Mystery

Introns are non-coding regions of DNA found within genes of eukaryotic
organisms. They are transcribed into RNA but are later removed by a process
called splicing before the final mRNA is formed. Introns play a key role in
the regulation of gene expression and are thought to have evolved as a way
to increase the diversity and complexity of proteins that can be produ The
origins of introns, segments of non-coding DNA that must be removed from
genetic code before protein synthesis, are one of the most enduring
mysteries in biology. Introns are a universal feature of eukaryotic
genomes, found in all animals, plants, fungi, and protists, but not in
prokaryotic genomes, such as those of bacteria. Despite their ubiquity,
there is significant variation in the number of introns found in
different species’ genomes, even among closely related species. This has
made understanding the origins and evolution of introns a long-standing,
fundamental mystery in biology.ced from a single gene.

Now, a new study led by scientists at the *University of California, Santa
Cruz* <https://scitechdaily.com/tag/uc-santa-cruz/> and published in the
journal *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS)* points to
introners, one of several proposed mechanisms for the creation of introns
discovered in 2009, as an explanation for the origins of most introns
across species. The researchers believe that introners are the only likely
explanation for intron burst events, in which thousands of introns show up
in a genome seemingly all at once, and they find evidence of this in
species across the tree of life. “[This study] provides a plausible
explanation for the vast majority of origins of introns,” said Russell
Corbett-Detig, associate professor of biomolecular engineering and senior
author on the study. “There are other mechanisms out there, but this is the
only one that I know of that could generate thousands and thousands of
introns all at once in the genome. If true, this suggests that we’ve
uncovered a core process driving something that’s really special about
eukaryotic genomes – we have these introns, we have genomic complexity.”

ntrons are important because they allow for alternative splicing, which in
turn allows one gene to code for multiple transcripts and therefore serve
multiple complex cellular functions. Introns can also affect gene
expression, the rate at which genes get turned on to make proteins and
other non-coding RNA. Introns ultimately have a neutral to slightly
negative effect on the species they exist in because when the splicing of
introns is not carried out correctly, the gene they live in can be harmed
and even die. Such missed splicing instances are the cause of some cancers.

Corbett-Detig and his colleagues searched the genomes of 3,325 eukaryotic
species – all of the species for which we have access to high-quality
reference genomes – to find out how common introner-derived introns are,
and in which groups of species they are seen most frequently. They found a
total of 27,563 introner-derived introns in the genomes of 175 species,
meaning evidence of introners could be seen in 5.2% of surveyed species.

This evidence was found in species of all types, from animals to
single-cell protists – organisms whose last common ancestor lived over 1.7
billion years ago. The diversity of species in which they are found
suggests introners are both the fundamental and most widespread source of
introns across the tree of life.

“It’s diverse – it isn’t like there’s one little chunk of the tree of life
that has this going on,” Corbett-Detig said. “You see this in a pretty big
range of species, which suggests it’s a pretty general mechanism.”

This analysis can only detect evidence of introners going back some
millions of years, a relatively short time span when it comes to
evolutionary history. It’s likely that intron bursts could have occurred in
some species, such as humans, at a time beyond the scope of this analysis –
meaning this study probably vastly underestimates the true scope of
introner-dervied introns across all eukaryotes.

Introners as genomic parasites

In the ecosystem of the genome, introners can be thought of as a parasite
with the goal to survive and replicate themselves. When an introner enters
a new organism, that new host has never seen that element before and has no
way to defend itself, allowing it to proliferate in a new species.

“Everything in evolution is a conflict and these elements, [including
introners], are selfish pieces of DNA,” said Landen Gozashti, the paper’s
first author who developed the study’s analysis methods as an undergraduate
at UCSC and is now a graduate student at *Harvard University*
<https://scitechdaily.com/tag/harvard-university/>. “They only want to
replicate, and the only reason they don’t want to kill their host is
because that kills them.”

In being spliced out of the DNA sequence before translation of the gene
into proteins occurs, the introners found a way to have less impact on the
fitness of the host gene, allowing them to persist through the generations
of the host species’ evolution. The researchers found that
introners-derived introns seem to splice better than other types of
introns, to limit their negative effects on the gene so that both the
introner and the host can better survive.

More introners in the sea

While all introners were found across all types of species, results showed
that marine organisms were 6.5 times more likely to have introners than
land species.

The researchers think this is likely due to a phenomenon called horizontal
gene transfer, in which genes transfer from one species to a different one,
as opposed to the typical vertical transfer via mating and the passing of
genes from parent to child. Horizontal gene transfer has already been known
to occur more commonly in marine environments, especially between
single-cell species with complex ecologies.

Introners can travel this way because they belong to a class of genomic
elements called transposable elements, which have the ability to move
beyond the cell environment in which they live, making them mechanistically
well-equipped to travel between species via horizontal gene transfer. As
introners transferred from one species to another in marine environments,
they vastly expanded their presence across the tree of life.

Considering we know that all species evolved from marine organisms, it
could have been that land species gained introns from intron bursts far
back in their evolutionary history.

“If your ancestors were marine organisms, which they all were, there’s a
good chance that a lot of your introns are sort of inherited from a similar
[introner burst] event back then,” Corbett-Detig said. “This might have
been very important in our evolutionary past.”

More introners were also found across fungal species, which are also known
to have higher rates of horizontal gene transfer, further supporting the
idea that this phenomenon drives introner gain.

In future research, Corbett-Detig plans to look for proof of horizontal
gene transfer in the form of nearly identical introners in two different
species. He has set up data mining pipelines so that as the global
community of genomics researchers contributes new species’ genomes to data
repositories, his algorithm will search each new genome’s introners and
compare it to all of the known introners to look for similarities.

Understanding how complexity evolves

This study presents a challenge to one of the overarching theories of
genome evolution as to what drives genomic complexity in eukaryotes. The
theory also posits that at a point in evolution, many species had low
effective population sizes, meaning very few organisms in a species were
producing offspring to create their next generation. This allowed elements
known to have slightly negative effects on the population to accumulate in
the genome.

Following this theory, introners, which are neutral to slightly
deleterious, would be seen more commonly in populations with lower
effective populations – but the researchers found the opposite. For
example, they found that Symbiodinium, a protist known to have a much
higher effective population size than humans, land plants, and
other invertebrates, is the species that seems to be gaining the most
introns of those surveyed.

But this research points toward complexity arising not from an adaptation
created by the genome itself but as a response to conflict caused by the
invading transposable element, the introner, as it tries to proliferate. As
introners and other elements struggle to survive and persist, this conflict
drives genome complexity.

The neutral to negative effects of introns is also evidenced by their
effect on gene expression. When comparing genes with introners inserted
into them to genes without, those that do have introners had a lower
overall expression level, meaning they are turned on less often to perform
functions in the body.

The researchers believe that introners are not necessarily directly causing
this lower expression, but that genes that are expressed less have a higher
tolerance for an element that may be affecting them negatively because they
matter less for the species’ survival. Meanwhile, genes that are highly
expressed and may be coding for key functions in the body likely can’t
tolerate the introduction of new introns that could cause them to perform
their task less effectively. Corbett-Detig’s ongoing research on this topic
also involves looking at direct evidence of how the appearance of introns
in a genome affects individuals within a species. He has identified several
species that are experiencing ongoing intron bursts and is looking at the
effect of introners on the DNA and RNA of the cell, and how this affects
the species’ evolutionary fitness.  KR IRS 27123

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoobdondPJ7zCC2V27%2BF-SbS8i1xtByLnC4%2BVtW0Bk%3D6rQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to