Mr Sekar had produced an article on Artificial Intelligence usage on Music,
one part of Google, depicting a kind of scary feeling. However, it is a
tool; as aa software we use gmail , Google etc and whats app etc. As a
matter of fact, M S V and earlier and a part of Ilaya Raja in the earlier
period, were tuning and recorded as notes and then Musicians were
allocated to raise a song. But this theory was first broken by A R rtahman.
He used to record the "chords" first; then he would record the beats only ;
then he would add instruments as interludes; then extra interpolations that
were essential for the picturisation were added; then the lyricist was
called to write words for the above tune and beats. Then the runner like
Srinivas and his retinue will sing and record; this mix up wrt the original
BGMs were sent by online, tapes or pen drives to the playback singers; the
PBS will arrive at the appointed time individually ,just record their
portion and will go away. Because the pitch of the BGM was so high, A R
Rahman would need one who can sing like the instrument does on strings or
air which is pretty difficult . Now no one knows, including the ARR, what
exactly is there. Now the ARR will mix up the tracks punching ,cutting and
adding extra interpolations to fill. Then the song will be delivered by the
computer . This will be given to the sound engineer who will mix up and
upgrade or downgrade ,as audible and tasty to the ears. There the next
level of 5 1 speakers, 2 speakers and 7 1 speaker ,divisions of sound will
be done. AI now gives those types of chords, a beat and a kind of lines as
Rahman did once on his computer. The play back singers will know only at
that stage what they sang listening to the tune in one piece and wonder
where what they heard while voice recording had gone?.  AI is another name
for Robotics. One thing shall be remembered; we have to create it. Creative
modality is ours. Storage and maintenance of our creativity is AI.   K
Rajaram   IRS   5123

On Sun, 5 Feb 2023 at 01:05, 'N Sekar' via iyer123 <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I thought this is worth sharing.
>
> First part, which is about Artificial Intelligence (AI) is a bit scary.
> Nobody's job is safe anymore. Just listen to the audio.
>
> N Sekar
> [image: Finshots]
> <https://bn9wksbn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Ffinshots.in%3Futm_source=emailHeader%26utm_medium=mailshots/1/010001861faef7a3-d73575b5-a707-4a90-89e7-84cb18585cb6-000000/AioGOYJbQzenhQRiLvIIh8YSxSE=307>
>  Sunny
> Side Up 🍳: AI Music, Devil in your SIPs & Expensive Paintings [image:
> Sunny Side Up ��: AI Music, Devil in your SIPs & Expensive Paintings |
> Finshots Daily Newsletter]
>
> Hi friends,
>
> Are you still reeling under all those Twitter threads and LinkedIn posts
> about how ChatGPT is going to take over the world? Everyone’s busy listing
> out the kinds of jobs that will be lost thanks to AI. Even us writers. 😟
>
> But have you seen what Google has been up to with AI?
>
> Last week, the tech giant quietly released something called MusicLM. It’s
> an AI that has been trained on 280,000 hours of music. And now, it can
> create some thumping music for you. Even from complex text prompts like
> this
> <https://bn9wksbn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fgoogle-research.github.io%2Fseanet%2Fmusiclm%2Fexamples%2F/1/010001861faef7a3-d73575b5-a707-4a90-89e7-84cb18585cb6-000000/0_jm430GzZ6GopWw8A_BluJB8nA=307>
> — “A rising synth is playing an arpeggio with a lot of reverb. It is backed
> by pads, sub bass line and soft drums. This song is full of synth sounds
> creating a soothing and adventurous atmosphere. It may be playing at a
> festival during two songs for a buildup.”
>
> It really sounds too good to be true.
>
> Now Google isn’t releasing MusicLM to the world just yet. But why’s that,
> you ask?
>
> Apparently, there’s a bit of an ethical dilemma here. You see, MusicLM has
> this tendency to take original material created by artists and use it in
> its own music. It’s not that bad — only 1% of its music was plagiarised so
> to speak. But it’s still a problem. You don’t want to get sued by massive
> music production businesses for copyright infringement.
>
> There’s also something else that lawyer Chris Mammen pointed out to The
> Verge. Let’s say you’re purchasing a song. Are you buying the rights to
> play the song or are you also buying the right to use it for training AI
> bots? Do you need the artist’s permission before you put it to use?
>
> Lawyers aren’t quite sure what’s the right answer yet.
>
> So yeah, you can see why Google’s keeping its public release on hold for
> now. But the way things are shaping up, it looks like even music producers
> are soon going to face the heat of AI!
>
> *Here’s a non-AI soundtrack to get you in the mood* 🎵
>
> Sukoon
> <https://bn9wksbn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv=VO373TZwaM8/1/010001861faef7a3-d73575b5-a707-4a90-89e7-84cb18585cb6-000000/_Yur7gp9Eu4NnsT-BLCiaUd-7Lk=307>
> by Hassan & Roshaan ft Shae Gill
>
> Listen to this non-AI generated song and tell us it doesn’t soothe you?!
> Hat tip to our reader Aakankshi Bothara for this lovely recommendation.
>
> *A couple of things caught our eye this week 👀*
>
> *Meta’s big day is thanks to firing people*
>
> Meta’s (formerly Facebook) stock price jumped 20%
> <https://bn9wksbn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fwww.bloomberg.com%2Fnews%2Farticles%2F2023-02-01%2Fmeta-revenue-beats-expectations-as-facebook-keeps-growing/1/010001861faef7a3-d73575b5-a707-4a90-89e7-84cb18585cb6-000000/biikYvPVl0YQIf5_E3dJ0Bn-Aw0=307>
> on Friday. It was its biggest single-day jump in a decade. But guess what?
> It wasn’t some new buzzword like Metaverse that did the trick. It wasn’t
> even its latest earnings which was a bummer really — it fell a whopping
> 55%
> <https://bn9wksbn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fwww.fastcompany.com%2F90843696%2Fmeta-fb-stock-buybacks-revenue-profit-q4-ad-sales/1/010001861faef7a3-d73575b5-a707-4a90-89e7-84cb18585cb6-000000/B7zxd1uYfqrt_9w3hsLhEwR_Lxg=307>
> during Oct-Dec 2022 compared to the same period in 2021.
>
> What did the trick?
>
> Well, a couple of things.
>
> See, investors only care about future profits. Meta’s slashed 13% of its
> workforce already. And it could just be the tip of the iceberg. More job
> cuts could be on the way. Free perks will be thrown out of the window.
> Heck, Meta’s CTO
> <https://bn9wksbn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fboz.com%2Farticles%2Ffocus/1/010001861faef7a3-d73575b5-a707-4a90-89e7-84cb18585cb6-000000/C73SYU4NMZMplk4vfkwP1dldJSs=307>
> even published a blog post where he said how Facebook’s culture had changed
> — from initially saying no to charitable donation to then saying yes
> without thinking. And well, charitable donations don’t help a company’s
> core business.
>
> Now he may not really have meant to say that charity at Facebook was a bad
> thing. But you get the drift. It’s all going to be about fiscal discipline
> in 2023. You can be sure that investors will rub their hands in glee when
> they hear of every cost-cutting measure. They’ll probably make more money
> in the future.
>
> But the bigger thing is that Meta announced a $40 billion dollar buyback.
> What does that mean, you ask?
>
> Well, Meta has some spare cash lying around. It’ll also pad up its coffers
> after all those layoffs. So what can it do with the money? Well, it could
> invest it into projects that will help it move the needle in a big way. But
> if there aren’t enough such ideas, it can return the cash back to
> investors. Meta will pay them a nice sum of money and simply buy the shares
> back from them.
>
> So yeah, investors love layoffs and getting money into their pockets
> instead. Simple.
>
> *****
>
> *Apple Watches are creating havoc*
>
> Apple’s ads are brilliant. Let’s face it. Apple knows how to play to your
> emotions and sell product. And they don’t just tell you facts about the
> product. They’ll weave a story. Like the ad about privacy where a person is
> chased by a barista at a coffee shop, the banker, and everyone else for
> data.
>
> But the most hard-hitting ad is probably one they made for the Apple
> Watch. It’s called 911 and it simply tells you the stories of real people
> who were stuck in real emergencies and called for help using their Apple
> Watch. The watch saved their lives. And the ad plays to the basest of human
> emotions — fear. Fear of dying.
>
> It’s brilliant.
>
> But there’s another feature of the Apple Watch — the fall detector. Now,
> when Apple launched this feature, this is what their website said
> <https://bn9wksbn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fsupport.apple.com%2Fen-in%2FHT208944/1/010001861faef7a3-d73575b5-a707-4a90-89e7-84cb18585cb6-000000/x4rOO6yJyiOnhfS1nwlwQlbhoOs=307>
> .
>
> *“If Apple Watch SE or Apple Watch Series 4 or later detects a hard fall
> while you’re wearing your watch, it taps you on the wrist, sounds an alarm,
> and displays an alert. You can choose to contact emergency services or
> dismiss the alert by pressing the Digital Crown, tapping Close in the
> upper-left corner, or tapping “I’m OK.”*
>
> *If your Apple Watch detects that you’re moving, it waits for you to
> respond to the alert and won’t automatically call emergency services. If
> your watch detects that you’ve been immobile for about a minute, it will
> make the call automatically.”*
>
> Sounds perfectly reasonable, right? If you’re fine and can respond, no
> harm done.
>
> But here’s the thing. Apple Watches seem to be on overdrive these days.
> Apple made the software more sensitive and it keeps making false automated
> calls now. Especially when people are skiing. Now if someone’s skiing, and
> there’s a false alert, they can’t just stop on the slope and hit ‘I’m OK’,
> right?
>
> So emergency workers
> <https://bn9wksbn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2023%2F02%2F03%2Fhealth%2Fapple-watch-911-emergency-call.html/1/010001861faef7a3-d73575b5-a707-4a90-89e7-84cb18585cb6-000000/wlYaceKNnpI2-xnXagmxTe1oSgI=307>
> in the US have to respond to all these falls calls now. And they’re not
> happy about it. Because it could mean they suddenly put other calls on
> hold. Calls which are real emergencies.
>
> And what do these emergency responders want?
>
> Well, they think that Apple should maybe have its own call centre to deal
> with emergencies triggered by its feature
>
> *Money tips 💰*
>
> *The devil in your SIP*
>
> We’ll all been sold fairy tales of Systematic Investment Plans or SIPs. In
> case you’re wondering what on earth is an SIP — it’s just an automated
> monthly investment you make into a mutual fund. Everyone tells you that
> SIPs are the best way to build long-term wealth. That the magic of
> compounding will work in your favour.
>
> And this is true. If you’re disciplined and invest money regularly, it
> truly does compound and create riches.
>
> But sometimes, SIPs can shock you too. Because there’s something no one
> tells us — It’s never a one way ride to the top. And as the infamous lines
> go, “Even SIPs are subject to market risk.”
>
> Yes, the calculators and charts show you values that simply go up and up
> and up. But no one shows the stock market crashes that occur in between all
> this.
>
> Let me paint a picture.
>
> Imagine you’ve diligently invested ₹10,000 every month through the fabled
> SIP route. The investment grows and after 5 years, it’s worth ₹8 lakhs.
> You’re happy. It’s exactly what all those charts promised.
>
> But then, the stock market crashes by 30%. You look at the investment and
> it’s now worth only ₹5.6 lakhs. 5 years of investing goes down the drain.
> You wish you’d just put money into an FD instead. You curse everyone who
> ever uttered the word SIP.
>
> You panic seeing this loss and withdraw the investment.
>
> And I don’t blame you for that. It’s an evolutionary trait. If we see a
> snake today, we’ll quickly flee in the opposite direction. It’s a
> fight-or-flight response. Our brain has evolved to respond quickly to any
> risk it perceives. And that’s valid even if it’s the risk of the stock
> market. When we see red and everything crashing, we want to take our money
> and run away. We overreact.
>
> That’s what happens all the time.
>
> But slowly, the market recovers. It continues to march upwards. Investors
> who braved the uncertainty continue to make money. They even kept investing
> during the market crash. Which means that they kept buying at cheaper and
> cheaper levels. Smart!
>
> You, on the other hand, are not gaining anything anymore. You already
> withdrew your money disappointed at what you thought were false promises of
> SIPs. If only someone had told you, “SIPs are not a magic wand. Be patient.”
>
> At least now you know that you simply should’ve ignored the noise. You
> have a new mantra — ‘Just Keep Investing”.
>
> *Readers Recommend 🗒️*
>
> Quit: The Power of Knowing When To Walk Away
> <https://bn9wksbn.r.us-east-1.awstrack.me/L0/https:%2F%2Fwww.goodreads.com%2Fbook%2Fshow%2F60097435-quit/1/010001861faef7a3-d73575b5-a707-4a90-89e7-84cb18585cb6-000000/EeNCRqvuLkUQnrVXX5b2zkMi23w=307>
> by Annie Duke
>
> This brilliant book was recommended by our reader Rishabh Jhol. Now he put
> quite a bit of effort into trying to explain what the book is about in a
> nutshell. But the gist of it can be captured in these few lines:
>
> *“It is important to quit not only because the path you are pursuing isn’t
> worthwhile anymore, but also because you are less likely to put your time,
> money, and intention in exploring other opportunities due to myopic path
> dependency*
>
> *….*
>
> *When we are on a path, we tie our identity to it. We suffer from sunk
> cost fallacy as we believe we’ve invested too much into it and it would be
> foolish to move away. It potentially prevents us from having a bigger
> outcome in life.”*
>
> And if you’re not a reader, he says that the audiobook is a great
> companion for walks too.
>
> So read it, listen to it, and let us know what you think.
>
> ***
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "iyer123" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1441274088.326776.1675587870080%40mail.yahoo.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/iyer123/1441274088.326776.1675587870080%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Thatha_Patty" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoo-05wt_zbuR1qrna8si-3TaK%2BmR0pg6zfc0grxf0Cafg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to