Theism sustained nature; atheism shattered all of them; right? Nature is part of us; we are the nature; we are in nature; so to dig a garden, for good or bad, only a spade is needed and not your bhakti; both theist and atheist can dig the garden. The change in the Garden is being carried out , only for the self serving purpose of food and developments of economy. As long as I do it in my garden I am good; but if I clandestinely dig one foot away, in my neighbor's garden and plant and reap, then I am greedy; that greedy men are both theist and the atheist. Hence we may have to be true theist or true atheist; both do not harm nature. Acting godmen and non-godmen alone spoil nature. KR IRS 14 8 23
On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 at 08:01, Markendeya Yeddanapudi < [email protected]> wrote: > > > -- > *Mar*The Age of Theism > > > > Education started as Theism, in the belief in God. When one looked at > nature, at a tree, plant, mountain or waterfall, one searched for the Gods > there. One ardently and sincerely wanted to know by feeling. Automatically > nature became God. Education was searching for and feeling God or seeing > everything as a creation and manifestation of God. Seeing was coordinated > with breathing, smelling, sensing and feeling, creating various images of > God. One teamed up with nature to live. One served nature, the sacred God > and Nature (God) served him and he derived strength continuously from > nature. One experienced diverse manifestations of nature and as a result > there were simply Gods by crores in number. Each person evolved his/her own > God. In each person dozens of Gods sprouted. Each God was a chapter in the > study of nature, by feeling nature. Smelling and hearing and listening, > automatically became feelings. > > Tunes, music, songs and poems sprouted. The Gods were given human Avatars. > Prayers to God were prayers to Nature. > > And nature became one person. The Biosphere became one organism > emotionally as breathing, smelling, sensing and feeling created the natural > bond fueled by feeling. God or nature conversed. A Hindu conversed with > nature continuously. > > When a deviation in nature from the common characteristic features of > nature was found, a Temple was constructed. Each Temple God represented > specific features particular to the area where the Temple was constructed. > The Temple became the destination for Pilgrims. The pilgrims breathed, > smelt and felt the particular characteristics of the Temple God there. > Freedom to nature there was freedom and authority to the God of the Temple > there. > > Each God has a separate name, Srisila Mallikarjuna, Lord Venkateswara of > Tirumala, Amareswara of Amarawathi,etc, etc.Some Gods represent Vishnu the > administration side of nature and others represent Siva the transformation > side of nature. > > The basic characteristics of nature, the creation aspect represented by > Brahma as per the Jnana of Saraswathi, the administration aspect as > represented by Vishnu as per the wisdom wealth of Luxmi, and the > transformation aspect of nature as represented by Siva as per the manual of > Durga, were represented in each Temple specifying a particular aspect. > > The Temple architecture was emotion based Architecture, representing the > specific characteristics of nature of the area where the Temple was > constructed. > > During the age of Theism, nature thrived and prospered. Nature was God and > sacred. > > Today nature is not sacred. It can be abused continuously and called the > destruction economic activity. I need not write more. > > YM > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Thatha_Patty" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/thatha_patty/CAL5XZoqzW2QLvpjZQJusAiRfWb4ZAmYuVzH14%2BQLJLMC55qQ0w%40mail.gmail.com.
